Suppr超能文献

金砖国家的 COVID-19 大流行及其与社会经济和人口特征、健康脆弱性、资源和政策应对的关联。

COVID-19 pandemic in BRICS countries and its association with socio-economic and demographic characteristics, health vulnerability, resources, and policy response.

机构信息

Department of Economics, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.

Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Peking University, Haidian District, No. 38, Xueyuan Road, Beijing, 100191, China.

出版信息

Infect Dis Poverty. 2021 Jul 8;10(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s40249-021-00881-w.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Little attention has been paid to the comparison of COVID-19 pandemic responses and related factors in BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa) countries. We aimed at evaluating the association of daily new COVID-19 cases with socio-economic and demographic factors, health vulnerability, resources, and policy response in BRICS countries.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional study using data on the COVID-19 pandemic and other indicators of BRICS countries from February 26, 2020 to April 30, 2021. We compared COVID-19 epidemic in BRICS countries and analyzed related factors by log-linear Generalized Additive Model (GAM) models.

RESULTS

In BRICS countries, India had the highest totally of confirmed cases with 18.76 million, followed by Brazil (14.45 million), Russia (4.81 million), and South Africa (1.58 million), while China (0.10 million) had the lowest figure. South Africa had the lowest rate of administered vaccine doses (0.18 million) among BRICS countries as of April 30, 2021. In the GAM model, a 1 unit increase in population density and policy stringency index was associated with a 5.17% and 1.95% growth in daily new COVID-19 cases (P < 0.001), respectively. Exposure-response curves for the effects of policy stringency index on daily new cases showed that there was a rapid surge in number of daily new COVID-19 cases when the index ranged from 0 to 45. The number of infections climbed slowly when the index ranged from 46 to 80, and decreased when the index was above 80 (P < 0.001). In addition, daily new COVID-19 cases (all P < 0.001) were also correlated with life expectancy at birth (-1.61%), extreme poverty (8.95%), human development index (-0.05%), GDP per capita (-0.18%), diabetes prevalence (0.66%), proportion of population aged 60 and above (2.23%), hospital beds per thousand people (-0.08%), proportion of people with access to improved drinking water (-7.40%), prevalence of open defecation (0.69%), and annual tourist/visitor arrivals (0.003%), after controlling other confounders. Different lag structures showed similar results in the sensitivity analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Strong policy response is crucial to control the pandemic, such as effective containment and case management. Our findings also highlighted the importance of reducing socio-economic inequalities and strengthening the resilience of health systems to better respond to public health emergencies globally.

摘要

背景

金砖国家(巴西、俄罗斯、印度、中国和南非)在应对 COVID-19 大流行方面的比较及其相关因素尚未得到充分关注。我们旨在评估金砖国家每日新增 COVID-19 病例与社会经济和人口因素、健康脆弱性、资源和政策应对之间的关联。

方法

我们使用 2020 年 2 月 26 日至 2021 年 4 月 30 日期间金砖国家 COVID-19 大流行和其他指标的数据进行了横断面研究。我们比较了金砖国家的 COVID-19 疫情,并通过对数线性广义加性模型(GAM)模型分析了相关因素。

结果

在金砖国家中,印度的确诊病例总数最高,为 1876 万例,其次是巴西(1445 万例)、俄罗斯(481 万例)和南非(158 万例),而中国(0.10 万例)的病例数最低。截至 2021 年 4 月 30 日,南非在金砖国家中接种疫苗剂量最低(0.18 万剂)。在 GAM 模型中,人口密度和政策严格程度指数每增加 1 个单位,每日新增 COVID-19 病例分别增加 5.17%和 1.95%(均<0.001)。政策严格程度指数对每日新增病例影响的暴露反应曲线表明,当指数在 0 到 45 之间时,每日新增 COVID-19 病例数迅速增加。当指数在 46 到 80 之间时,感染人数增长缓慢,当指数高于 80 时,感染人数减少(均<0.001)。此外,每日新增 COVID-19 病例数还与其他因素有关,包括出生时预期寿命(-1.61%)、赤贫(8.95%)、人类发展指数(-0.05%)、人均国内生产总值(-0.18%)、糖尿病患病率(0.66%)、60 岁及以上人口比例(2.23%)、每千人拥有的病床数(-0.08%)、获得改良饮用水的人口比例(-7.40%)、露天排便的流行率(0.69%)和每年的游客/访客人数(0.003%)(均<0.001),在控制了其他混杂因素后。敏感性分析显示,不同的滞后结构得到了类似的结果。

结论

强有力的政策应对对于控制大流行至关重要,例如有效的遏制和病例管理。我们的研究结果还强调了减少社会经济不平等和加强卫生系统弹性以更好地应对全球突发公共卫生事件的重要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8fe5/8268393/01992013c0b3/40249_2021_881_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

2
Core policies disparity response to COVID-19 among BRICS countries.
Int J Equity Health. 2022 Jan 20;21(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s12939-021-01614-z.
3
Future health spending forecast in leading emerging BRICS markets in 2030: health policy implications.
Health Res Policy Syst. 2022 Feb 19;20(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s12961-022-00822-5.
6
An assessment of progress towards universal health coverage in Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa (BRICS).
Lancet. 2014 Dec 13;384(9960):2164-71. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60075-1. Epub 2014 Apr 30.
7
Assessing sub-regional-specific strengths of healthcare systems associated with COVID-19 prevalence, deaths and recoveries in Africa.
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 1;16(3):e0247274. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247274. eCollection 2021.
8
Health System Outcomes in BRICS Countries and Their Association With the Economic Context.
Front Public Health. 2020 Mar 31;8:80. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00080. eCollection 2020.
9
Association between obesity and selected morbidities: a study of BRICS countries.
PLoS One. 2014 Apr 9;9(4):e94433. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0094433. eCollection 2014.

引用本文的文献

1
2
Gini coefficient, GDP per capita and COVID-19 mortality: a systematic review of ecologic studies.
BMC Public Health. 2025 May 27;25(1):1960. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22921-y.
3
Governance and responses of health and surveillance systems to COVID-19 in BRICS countries: A scoping review protocol.
PLoS One. 2025 Mar 17;20(3):e0319572. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0319572. eCollection 2025.
4
"The COVID-19 pandemic in BRICS: Milestones, interventions, and molecular epidemiology".
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024 Dec 20;4(12):e0003023. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003023. eCollection 2024.
5
Effects of air pollution on global health: evidence from the global burden of disease study in the BRICS countries.
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2024 Oct;97(8):813-832. doi: 10.1007/s00420-024-02087-7. Epub 2024 Jul 12.
6
Were public interventions relevant for containing the covid-19 pandemic in Brazil in 2020?
Rev Saude Publica. 2023 Nov 3;57:77. doi: 10.11606/s1518-8787.2023057005030. eCollection 2023.
7
Future health expenditure in the BRICS countries: a forecasting analysis for 2035.
Global Health. 2023 Jul 11;19(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s12992-023-00947-4.
8
Long-term impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on health services utilization in China: A nationwide longitudinal study.
Glob Transit. 2023;5:21-28. doi: 10.1016/j.glt.2023.03.002. Epub 2023 Mar 24.
9
Cohort Profile: Real-Time Insights of COVID-19 in India (RTI COVID-India).
BMC Public Health. 2023 Feb 9;23(1):292. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15084-1.
10

本文引用的文献

1
2
Experience of the COVID-19 Pandemic in Rural Odisha, India: Knowledge, Preventative Actions, and Impacts on Daily Life.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 11;18(6):2863. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18062863.
3
COVID-19 in Russia: Should we expect a novel response to the novel coronavirus?
Glob Public Health. 2021 Aug-Sep;16(8-9):1237-1250. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2021.1900317. Epub 2021 Mar 19.
4
A global panel database of pandemic policies (Oxford COVID-19 Government Response Tracker).
Nat Hum Behav. 2021 Apr;5(4):529-538. doi: 10.1038/s41562-021-01079-8. Epub 2021 Mar 8.
5
Non-linear correlation between daily new cases of COVID-19 and meteorological factors in 127 countries.
Environ Res. 2021 Feb;193:110521. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2020.110521. Epub 2020 Dec 3.
6
Forecasting of COVID-19 infections in E7 countries and proposing some policies based on the Stringency Index.
J Popul Ther Clin Pharmacol. 2020 Oct 15;27(S Pt 1):e76-e84. doi: 10.15586/jptcp.v27SP1.757. eCollection 2020.
7
COVID-19 in New Zealand and the impact of the national response: a descriptive epidemiological study.
Lancet Public Health. 2020 Nov;5(11):e612-e623. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30225-5. Epub 2020 Oct 14.
9
COVID-19 in South Africa.
Glob Epidemiol. 2020 Nov;2:100034. doi: 10.1016/j.gloepi.2020.100034. Epub 2020 Sep 23.
10
In the COVID-19 pandemic in Brazil, do brown lives matter?
Lancet Glob Health. 2020 Aug;8(8):e976-e977. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30314-4. Epub 2020 Jul 2.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验