Department of Economics, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Peking University, Haidian District, No. 38, Xueyuan Road, Beijing, 100191, China.
Infect Dis Poverty. 2021 Jul 8;10(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s40249-021-00881-w.
Little attention has been paid to the comparison of COVID-19 pandemic responses and related factors in BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa) countries. We aimed at evaluating the association of daily new COVID-19 cases with socio-economic and demographic factors, health vulnerability, resources, and policy response in BRICS countries.
We conducted a cross-sectional study using data on the COVID-19 pandemic and other indicators of BRICS countries from February 26, 2020 to April 30, 2021. We compared COVID-19 epidemic in BRICS countries and analyzed related factors by log-linear Generalized Additive Model (GAM) models.
In BRICS countries, India had the highest totally of confirmed cases with 18.76 million, followed by Brazil (14.45 million), Russia (4.81 million), and South Africa (1.58 million), while China (0.10 million) had the lowest figure. South Africa had the lowest rate of administered vaccine doses (0.18 million) among BRICS countries as of April 30, 2021. In the GAM model, a 1 unit increase in population density and policy stringency index was associated with a 5.17% and 1.95% growth in daily new COVID-19 cases (P < 0.001), respectively. Exposure-response curves for the effects of policy stringency index on daily new cases showed that there was a rapid surge in number of daily new COVID-19 cases when the index ranged from 0 to 45. The number of infections climbed slowly when the index ranged from 46 to 80, and decreased when the index was above 80 (P < 0.001). In addition, daily new COVID-19 cases (all P < 0.001) were also correlated with life expectancy at birth (-1.61%), extreme poverty (8.95%), human development index (-0.05%), GDP per capita (-0.18%), diabetes prevalence (0.66%), proportion of population aged 60 and above (2.23%), hospital beds per thousand people (-0.08%), proportion of people with access to improved drinking water (-7.40%), prevalence of open defecation (0.69%), and annual tourist/visitor arrivals (0.003%), after controlling other confounders. Different lag structures showed similar results in the sensitivity analysis.
Strong policy response is crucial to control the pandemic, such as effective containment and case management. Our findings also highlighted the importance of reducing socio-economic inequalities and strengthening the resilience of health systems to better respond to public health emergencies globally.
金砖国家(巴西、俄罗斯、印度、中国和南非)在应对 COVID-19 大流行方面的比较及其相关因素尚未得到充分关注。我们旨在评估金砖国家每日新增 COVID-19 病例与社会经济和人口因素、健康脆弱性、资源和政策应对之间的关联。
我们使用 2020 年 2 月 26 日至 2021 年 4 月 30 日期间金砖国家 COVID-19 大流行和其他指标的数据进行了横断面研究。我们比较了金砖国家的 COVID-19 疫情,并通过对数线性广义加性模型(GAM)模型分析了相关因素。
在金砖国家中,印度的确诊病例总数最高,为 1876 万例,其次是巴西(1445 万例)、俄罗斯(481 万例)和南非(158 万例),而中国(0.10 万例)的病例数最低。截至 2021 年 4 月 30 日,南非在金砖国家中接种疫苗剂量最低(0.18 万剂)。在 GAM 模型中,人口密度和政策严格程度指数每增加 1 个单位,每日新增 COVID-19 病例分别增加 5.17%和 1.95%(均<0.001)。政策严格程度指数对每日新增病例影响的暴露反应曲线表明,当指数在 0 到 45 之间时,每日新增 COVID-19 病例数迅速增加。当指数在 46 到 80 之间时,感染人数增长缓慢,当指数高于 80 时,感染人数减少(均<0.001)。此外,每日新增 COVID-19 病例数还与其他因素有关,包括出生时预期寿命(-1.61%)、赤贫(8.95%)、人类发展指数(-0.05%)、人均国内生产总值(-0.18%)、糖尿病患病率(0.66%)、60 岁及以上人口比例(2.23%)、每千人拥有的病床数(-0.08%)、获得改良饮用水的人口比例(-7.40%)、露天排便的流行率(0.69%)和每年的游客/访客人数(0.003%)(均<0.001),在控制了其他混杂因素后。敏感性分析显示,不同的滞后结构得到了类似的结果。
强有力的政策应对对于控制大流行至关重要,例如有效的遏制和病例管理。我们的研究结果还强调了减少社会经济不平等和加强卫生系统弹性以更好地应对全球突发公共卫生事件的重要性。