• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2型糖尿病合并晚期/极晚期支架血栓形成及病变患者的直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗:一项关于临床结局和影响因素的单中心观察性队列研究

Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes With Late/Very Late Stent Thrombosis and Lesions: A Single-Center Observational Cohort Study of Clinical Outcomes and Influencing Factors.

作者信息

Zhao Xiaoxiao, Lan Jun, Yu Xiaoping, Zhou Jinying, Tan Yu, Sheng Zhaoxue, Li Jiannan, Wang Ying, Chen Runzhen, Liu Chen, Zhou Peng, Chen Yi, Song Li, Zhao Hanjun, Yan Hongbing

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Beijing, China.

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine and Dongguan Cardiovascular Institute, Songshan Lake (SSL) Central Hospital of Dongguan City, The Third People's Hospital of Dongguan City, Affiliated Dongguan Shilong People's Hospital of Southern Medical University, Dongguan, China.

出版信息

Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021 Jun 22;8:653467. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.653467. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.3389/fcvm.2021.653467
PMID:34239902
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8258412/
Abstract

This study compared differences in the risk factors and clinical outcomes of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) and non-DM patients with lesions (DNLs) and late or very late stent thrombosis (LST/VLST). We used angiography to screen 4,151 patients with acute coronary syndrome for DNL and LST/VLST lesions. Overall, 3,941 patients were included in the analysis and were allocated to the DM ( = 1,286) or non-DM ( = 2,665) group at admission. The primary endpoint was a composite of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), defined as death, myocardial infarction, revascularization, and ischemic stroke, within a median follow-up period of 698 days. In the group with a total white blood cell count >10 × 10/L ( = 0.004), a neutral granular cell count >7 × 10/L ( = 0.030), and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio >1.5 ( = 0.041), revascularization was better for DNL than for LST/VLST lesions. Among DM patients with DNLs, each unit increase in age was associated with a 53.6% increase in the risk of MACEs [hazard ratio (HR): 1.536, 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.300-1.815, < 0.0001]. Older age (≥65 years) was associated with a significantly greater risk of MACEs ( < 0.0001). Furthermore, each standard deviation (SD) increase in the level of peak white blood cell counts was associated with a 50.1% increase in the risk of MACEs (HR, 1.501; 95% CI, 1.208-1.864; = 0.0002). When stratifying the DM population with DNLs according to the D-dimer baseline and peak levels <0.5 vs. ≥0.5 mg/L, the high D-dimer group at baseline had a 2.066-fold higher risk of MACEs ( < 0.0001), and the high peak level D-dimer group had a 1.877-fold higher risk of MACEs ( = 0.001) compared to the low-level groups. Among DM patients with LST/VLST, each unit increase in age was associated with a 75.9% increase in the risk of MACEs (HR: 1.759, 95% CI, 1.052-2.940, = 0.032). Furthermore, for each SD increase in the peak D-dimer level, the risk of MACEs increased by 59.7% (HR, 1.597; 95% CI, 1.110-2.295; = 0.041). Following successful primary PCI, the measurement of baseline and peak D-dimer values may help identify individuals at high cardiovascular risk. This suggests a potential benefit of lowering D-dimer levels among T2DM patients with DNL. Furthermore, age and the peak D-dimer values may facilitate the risk stratification of T2DM patients with LST/VLST.

摘要

本研究比较了2型糖尿病(DM)患者与非DM患者在原发性经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)中,病变(DNL)以及晚期或极晚期支架血栓形成(LST/VLST)的危险因素和临床结局的差异。我们使用血管造影术对4151例急性冠状动脉综合征患者进行DNL和LST/VLST病变筛查。总体而言,3941例患者纳入分析,并在入院时分为DM组(n = 1286)或非DM组(n = 2665)。主要终点是在698天的中位随访期内,主要不良心血管事件(MACE)的复合终点,定义为死亡、心肌梗死、血运重建和缺血性卒中。在白细胞总数>10×10⁹/L(P = 0.004)、中性粒细胞计数>7×10⁹/L(P = 0.030)和中性粒细胞-淋巴细胞比值>1.5(P = 0.041)的组中,DNL病变的血运重建效果优于LST/VLST病变。在患有DNL的DM患者中,年龄每增加一个单位,MACE风险增加53.6%[风险比(HR):1.536,95%置信区间(CI),1.300 - 1.815,P < 0.0001]。年龄较大(≥65岁)与MACE风险显著增加相关(P < 0.0001)。此外,白细胞峰值水平每增加一个标准差(SD),MACE风险增加50.1%(HR,1.501;95%CI,1.208 - 1.864;P = 0.0002)。当根据D - 二聚体基线和峰值水平<0.5与≥0.5mg/L对患有DNL的DM人群进行分层时,基线D - 二聚体高水平组的MACE风险比低水平组高2.066倍(P < 0.0001),峰值D - 二聚体高水平组的MACE风险比低水平组高1.877倍(P = 0.001)。在患有LST/VLST的DM患者中,年龄每增加一个单位,MACE风险增加75.9%(HR:1.759,95%CI,1.052 - 2.940,P = 0.032)。此外,D - 二聚体峰值水平每增加一个SD,MACE风险增加59.7%(HR,1.597;95%CI,1.110 - 2.295;P = 0.041)。在原发性PCI成功后,测量基线和峰值D - 二聚体值可能有助于识别心血管高风险个体。这表明降低患有DNL的2型糖尿病患者的D -二聚体水平可能有益。此外,年龄和D - 二聚体峰值水平可能有助于对患有LST/VLST的2型糖尿病患者进行风险分层。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/03d7/8258412/d8d7aff2eeae/fcvm-08-653467-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/03d7/8258412/8a5ae1edf5d8/fcvm-08-653467-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/03d7/8258412/2587183fd3b2/fcvm-08-653467-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/03d7/8258412/d8d7aff2eeae/fcvm-08-653467-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/03d7/8258412/8a5ae1edf5d8/fcvm-08-653467-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/03d7/8258412/2587183fd3b2/fcvm-08-653467-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/03d7/8258412/d8d7aff2eeae/fcvm-08-653467-g0003.jpg

相似文献

1
Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes With Late/Very Late Stent Thrombosis and Lesions: A Single-Center Observational Cohort Study of Clinical Outcomes and Influencing Factors.2型糖尿病合并晚期/极晚期支架血栓形成及病变患者的直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗:一项关于临床结局和影响因素的单中心观察性队列研究
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021 Jun 22;8:653467. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.653467. eCollection 2021.
2
Baseline plasma fibrinogen is associated with haemoglobin A1c and 2-year major adverse cardiovascular events following percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute coronary syndrome: a single-centre, prospective cohort study.基线血浆纤维蛋白原与急性冠状动脉综合征患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后血红蛋白 A1c 和 2 年主要不良心血管事件相关:一项单中心前瞻性队列研究。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2019 Apr 23;18(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s12933-019-0858-5.
3
Effect of diabetes mellitus on long-term outcomes after repeat drug-eluting stent implantation for in-stent restenosis.糖尿病对药物洗脱支架再植入治疗支架内再狭窄后长期预后的影响。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2017 Jan 6;17(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s12872-016-0445-6.
4
Comparison of long-term outcome after percutaneous coronary intervention for stent thrombosis between early, late, and very late stent thrombosis.比较早期、晚期和极晚期支架血栓形成患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后支架血栓形成的长期预后。
Circ J. 2014;78(1):101-9. doi: 10.1253/circj.cj-13-0780. Epub 2013 Nov 2.
5
In-hospital, short-term and long-term adverse clinical outcomes observed in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus vs non-diabetes mellitus following percutaneous coronary intervention: A meta-analysis including 139,774 patients.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后2型糖尿病患者与非糖尿病患者的院内、短期和长期不良临床结局:一项纳入139,774例患者的荟萃分析
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Feb;98(8):e14669. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000014669.
6
Clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention for early versus late and very late stent thrombosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗早期、晚期和极晚期支架血栓形成的临床转归:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2021 Apr;51(3):682-692. doi: 10.1007/s11239-020-02184-7.
7
Identification of vulnerable non-culprit lesions by coronary computed tomography angiography in patients with chronic coronary syndrome and diabetes mellitus.通过冠状动脉计算机断层扫描血管造影术识别慢性冠状动脉综合征和糖尿病患者的易损非罪犯病变
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Mar 23;10:1143119. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1143119. eCollection 2023.
8
Identification of Intrastent Pathology Associated With Late Stent Thrombosis Using Optical Coherence Tomography.使用光学相干断层扫描识别与晚期支架内血栓形成相关的支架内病变
J Interv Cardiol. 2015 Oct;28(5):439-48. doi: 10.1111/joic.12220. Epub 2015 Sep 18.
9
Mortality after presentation with stent thrombosis is associated with time from index percutaneous coronary intervention: a report from the VA CART program.支架血栓形成后出现的死亡率与首次经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的时间相关:来自退伍军人事务部CART项目的报告。
Am Heart J. 2014 Oct;168(4):560-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2014.07.020. Epub 2014 Jul 30.
10
Combination of D-dimer level and neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio predicts long-term clinical outcomes in acute coronary syndrome after percutaneous coronary intervention.D-二聚体水平与中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值联合预测经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后急性冠状动脉综合征的长期临床结局。
Cardiol J. 2023;30(4):576-586. doi: 10.5603/CJ.a2021.0097. Epub 2021 Sep 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Determinants of stroke following percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute coronary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.急性冠状动脉综合征患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后卒中的决定因素:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ann Med. 2025 Dec;57(1):2506481. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2025.2506481. Epub 2025 May 24.
2
The association of the systemic immune-inflammation index and stent thrombosis in myocardial infarction patients after coronary stent implantation-a retrospectively study.冠状动脉支架植入术后心肌梗死患者全身免疫炎症指数与支架内血栓形成的相关性——一项回顾性研究
J Thorac Dis. 2023 Apr 28;15(4):1726-1733. doi: 10.21037/jtd-23-363. Epub 2023 Apr 27.
3

本文引用的文献

1
The neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio and incident atherosclerotic events: analyses from five contemporary randomized trials.中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值与动脉粥样硬化事件的关系:五项当代随机试验的分析。
Eur Heart J. 2021 Mar 1;42(9):896-903. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa1034.
2
Visit-to-visit HbA variability is associated with in-stent restenosis in patients with type 2 diabetes after percutaneous coronary intervention.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后,2 型糖尿病患者的HbA 变异性与支架内再狭窄相关。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2020 Sep 4;19(1):133. doi: 10.1186/s12933-020-01111-7.
3
Propensity Score Matching: A Powerful Tool for Analyzing Observational Nonrandomized Data.
Clinical outcomes of drug-coated balloon for treatment of de novo coronary artery disease with and without diabetes.
药物涂层球囊治疗伴或不伴糖尿病的初发冠状动脉疾病的临床结局
Saudi Med J. 2022 Dec;43(12):1347-1353. doi: 10.15537/smj.2022.43.12.20220534.
4
Validation of plasma D-dimer in Chinese patients with acute non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction.血浆D-二聚体在中国急性非ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者中的验证
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Oct 19;9:896173. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.896173. eCollection 2022.
5
The monocyte to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio and outcomes in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome.2型糖尿病合并非ST段抬高型急性冠脉综合征患者的单核细胞与高密度脂蛋白胆固醇比值及预后
Ann Transl Med. 2021 Nov;9(21):1627. doi: 10.21037/atm-21-4876.
倾向评分匹配:一种分析观察性非随机数据的强大工具。
Clin Spine Surg. 2021 Feb 1;34(1):22-24. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000001055.
4
D-dimer level predicts in-hospital adverse outcomes after primary PCI for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.D-二聚体水平可预测ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的院内不良结局。
Int J Cardiol. 2020 Apr 15;305:1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2020.02.010. Epub 2020 Feb 4.
5
Propensity Score Matching: A Statistical Method.倾向得分匹配:一种统计方法。
Clin Spine Surg. 2020 Apr;33(3):120-122. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000932.
6
Microvascular and Cardiovascular Outcomes According to Renal Function in Patients Treated With Once-Weekly Exenatide: Insights From the EXSCEL Trial.根据 EXSCEL 试验结果,接受每周一次艾塞那肽治疗的患者的微血管和心血管结局与肾功能有关。
Diabetes Care. 2020 Feb;43(2):446-452. doi: 10.2337/dc19-1065. Epub 2019 Nov 22.
7
MicroRNA-33 and SIRT1 influence the coronary thrombus burden in hyperglycemic STEMI patients.miRNA-33 和 SIRT1 影响高血糖性 STEMI 患者的冠脉血栓负担。
J Cell Physiol. 2020 Feb;235(2):1438-1452. doi: 10.1002/jcp.29064. Epub 2019 Jul 11.
8
Adiponectin and insulin resistance are related to restenosis and overall new PCI in subjects with normal glucose tolerance: the prospective AIRE Study.脂联素和胰岛素抵抗与糖耐量正常患者的再狭窄和总体新 PCI 相关:前瞻性 AIRE 研究。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2019 Mar 4;18(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s12933-019-0826-0.
9
Effects of Metformin Therapy on Coronary Endothelial Dysfunction in Patients With Prediabetes With Stable Angina and Nonobstructive Coronary Artery Stenosis: The CODYCE Multicenter Prospective Study.二甲双胍治疗对稳定型心绞痛伴非阻塞性冠状动脉狭窄的糖尿病前期患者冠状动脉内皮功能障碍的影响:CODYCE 多中心前瞻性研究。
Diabetes Care. 2019 Oct;42(10):1946-1955. doi: 10.2337/dc18-2356. Epub 2019 Feb 22.
10
Thrombus aspiration in hyperglycemic ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients: clinical outcomes at 1-year follow-up.高血糖性 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者行血栓抽吸术:1 年随访时的临床结局。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2018 Nov 29;17(1):152. doi: 10.1186/s12933-018-0795-8.