• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

倾向评分匹配:一种分析观察性非随机数据的强大工具。

Propensity Score Matching: A Powerful Tool for Analyzing Observational Nonrandomized Data.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Division of Neurosurgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Clin Spine Surg. 2021 Feb 1;34(1):22-24. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000001055.

DOI:10.1097/BSD.0000000000001055
PMID:32804684
Abstract

In using observational, nonrandomized data, there is often interest in studying the effect of a particular treatment on a specific outcome. However, the imbalance of potential confounding variables between the treatment groups can distort the relationship between treatment and outcome. Propensity score matching is one, increasingly utilized, method to help account for such imbalances, allowing for a more accurate estimation of the influence of treatment on outcome. In this paper, we provide the clinician with an overview of propensity score matching techniques and provide a practical example of how this has been used in clinical research relevant to spine surgery.

摘要

在使用观察性、非随机数据时,人们通常有兴趣研究特定治疗对特定结果的影响。然而,治疗组之间潜在混杂变量的不平衡会扭曲治疗与结果之间的关系。倾向评分匹配是一种越来越被利用的方法,可以帮助解释这种不平衡,从而更准确地估计治疗对结果的影响。在本文中,我们为临床医生提供了倾向评分匹配技术的概述,并提供了一个实际的例子,说明如何将其用于与脊柱外科相关的临床研究。

相似文献

1
Propensity Score Matching: A Powerful Tool for Analyzing Observational Nonrandomized Data.倾向评分匹配:一种分析观察性非随机数据的强大工具。
Clin Spine Surg. 2021 Feb 1;34(1):22-24. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000001055.
2
Controlling for confounding via propensity score methods can result in biased estimation of the conditional AUC: A simulation study.通过倾向得分方法控制混杂因素可能会导致条件AUC的估计出现偏差:一项模拟研究。
Pharm Stat. 2019 Oct;18(5):568-582. doi: 10.1002/pst.1948. Epub 2019 May 20.
3
Estimating effects of nursing intervention via propensity score analysis.通过倾向得分分析评估护理干预的效果。
Nurs Res. 2008 Nov-Dec;57(6):444-52. doi: 10.1097/NNR.0b013e31818c66f6.
4
Propensity score methods for time-dependent cluster confounding.倾向评分法在时依性簇状混杂中的应用。
Biom J. 2020 Oct;62(6):1443-1462. doi: 10.1002/bimj.201900277. Epub 2020 May 18.
5
Merits and caveats of propensity scores to adjust for confounding.倾向评分调整混杂因素的优缺点。
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2019 Oct 1;34(10):1629-1635. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfy283.
6
Longitudinal Studies 4: Matching Strategies to Evaluate Risk.纵向研究 4:匹配策略评估风险。
Methods Mol Biol. 2021;2249:167-177. doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-1138-8_9.
7
Five Steps to Successfully Implement and Evaluate Propensity Score Matching in Clinical Research Studies.成功实施和评估临床研究中倾向评分匹配的五个步骤。
Anesth Analg. 2018 Oct;127(4):1066-1073. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002787.
8
A comparison of the ability of different propensity score models to balance measured variables between treated and untreated subjects: a Monte Carlo study.不同倾向得分模型平衡治疗组和未治疗组受试者间测量变量能力的比较:一项蒙特卡洛研究
Stat Med. 2007 Feb 20;26(4):734-53. doi: 10.1002/sim.2580.
9
Adjusting for unmeasured spatial confounding with distance adjusted propensity score matching.调整未测量的空间混杂因素与距离调整倾向评分匹配。
Biostatistics. 2019 Apr 1;20(2):256-272. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxx074.
10
Propensity score methods to control for confounding in observational cohort studies: a statistical primer and application to endoscopy research.倾向评分法在观察性队列研究中控制混杂因素的应用:统计入门及在内镜研究中的应用。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2019 Sep;90(3):360-369. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2019.04.236. Epub 2019 Apr 30.

引用本文的文献

1
TriNetX and Real-World Evidence: A Critical Review of Its Strengths, Limitations, and Bias Considerations in Clinical Research.TriNetX与真实世界证据:对其在临床研究中的优势、局限性及偏倚考量的批判性综述
ASIDE Intern Med. 2025 Apr;1(2):24-33. doi: 10.71079/aside.im.03222516. Epub 2025 Mar 22.
2
Cervical Disc Arthroplasty Versus Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion in the Treatment of Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: Patient Characteristics and Surgical Outcomes in a National Administrative Database.颈椎间盘置换术与颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术治疗退行性颈椎脊髓病:全国行政数据库中的患者特征及手术结果
Global Spine J. 2025 Mar 13:21925682251325823. doi: 10.1177/21925682251325823.
3
Comparative efficacy of uterine artery embolization versus laparoscopic myomectomy in treating uterine fibroids: a propensity score matched analysis.
子宫动脉栓塞术与腹腔镜子宫肌瘤切除术治疗子宫肌瘤的疗效比较:倾向评分匹配分析
Discov Oncol. 2025 Jan 7;16(1):14. doi: 10.1007/s12672-025-01737-7.
4
A predictive model for therapy failure in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia receiving tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy.慢性髓性白血病患者接受酪氨酸激酶抑制剂治疗后治疗失败的预测模型。
Blood. 2024 Oct 31;144(18):1951-1961. doi: 10.1182/blood.2024024761.
5
MDI versus CSII in Chinese adults with type 1 diabetes in a real-world situation: based on propensity score matching method.真实世界中中国成年 1 型糖尿病患者中 MDI 与 CSII 的对比:基于倾向评分匹配方法。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2024 Jun 13;22(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s12955-024-02263-w.
6
The relationship of platelet distribution width with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in peritoneal dialysis patients.血小板分布宽度与腹膜透析患者全因和心血管死亡率的关系。
Ren Fail. 2024 Dec;46(1):2300730. doi: 10.1080/0886022X.2023.2300730. Epub 2024 Feb 12.
7
Relationship of widowhood with pulse pressure, fasting blood glucose, and mental health in older adults: a propensity matching score analysis.丧偶与老年人脉压、空腹血糖和心理健康的关系:倾向评分匹配分析。
Front Public Health. 2023 Oct 25;11:1257133. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1257133. eCollection 2023.
8
Secretory breast carcinoma: clinicopathological features and prognosis of 52 patients.分泌型乳腺癌:52 例患者的临床病理特征和预后。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2024 Feb;203(3):543-551. doi: 10.1007/s10549-023-07153-1. Epub 2023 Oct 28.
9
Cervical laminoplasty versus laminectomy and posterior cervical fusion for cervical myelopathy: propensity-matched analysis of 24-month outcomes from the Quality Outcomes Database.颈椎板成形术与椎板切除术和后路颈椎融合术治疗颈椎病:来自质量结果数据库的 24 个月结局的倾向评分匹配分析。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2023 Aug 11;39(5):671-681. doi: 10.3171/2023.6.SPINE23345. Print 2023 Nov 1.
10
Utilization of hepatitis B surface antigen-positive donors in liver transplantation for recipients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective and propensity score matching analysis.乙型肝炎表面抗原阳性供体在肝细胞癌受体肝移植中的应用:一项回顾性和倾向评分匹配分析。
PeerJ. 2023 Jul 26;11:e15620. doi: 10.7717/peerj.15620. eCollection 2023.