• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

促进身体活动的建成环境干预措施经济评估的优先事项和指标

Priorities and Indicators for Economic Evaluation of Built Environment Interventions to Promote Physical Activity.

作者信息

Cradock Angie L, Buchner David, Zaganjor Hatidza, Thomas John V, Sallis James F, Rose Kenneth, Meehan Leslie, Lawson Megan, Lavinghouze René, Fenton Mark, Devlin Heather M, Carlson Susan A, Bhattacharya Torsha, Fulton Janet E

出版信息

J Phys Act Health. 2021 Jul 9;18(9):1088-1096. doi: 10.1123/jpah.2021-0191. Print 2021 Sep 1.

DOI:10.1123/jpah.2021-0191
PMID:34243168
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8629833/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Built environment approaches to promoting physical activity can provide economic value to communities. How best to assess this value is uncertain. This study engaged experts to identify a set of key economic indicators useful for evaluation, research, and public health practice.

METHODS

Using a modified Delphi process, a multidisciplinary group of experts participated in (1) one of 5 discussion groups (n = 21 experts), (2) a 2-day facilitated workshop (n = 19 experts), and/or (3) online surveys (n = 16 experts).

RESULTS

Experts identified 73 economic indicators, then used a 5-point scale to rate them on 3 properties: measurement quality, feasibility of use by a community, and influence on community decision making. Twenty-four indicators were highly rated (≥3.9 on all properties). The 10 highest-rated "key" indicators were walkability score, residential vacancy rate, housing affordability, property tax revenue, retail sales per square foot, number of small businesses, vehicle miles traveled per capita, employment, air quality, and life expectancy.

CONCLUSION

This study identified key economic indicators that could characterize the economic value of built environment approaches to promoting physical activity. Additional work could demonstrate the validity, feasibility, and usefulness of these key indicators, in particular to inform decisions about community design.

摘要

背景

通过建设环境促进身体活动的方法可为社区带来经济价值。如何最好地评估这种价值尚不确定。本研究邀请专家确定一组对评估、研究和公共卫生实践有用的关键经济指标。

方法

采用改良的德尔菲法,一个多学科专家小组参与了以下活动:(1)5个讨论小组之一(21名专家),(2)为期2天的促进研讨会(19名专家),和/或(3)在线调查(16名专家)。

结果

专家们确定了73个经济指标,然后用5分制对它们的三个属性进行评分:测量质量、社区使用的可行性以及对社区决策的影响。24个指标获得了高分(所有属性得分≥3.9)。评分最高的10个“关键”指标是步行适宜性得分、住宅空置率、住房可负担性、财产税收入、每平方英尺零售额、小企业数量、人均车辆行驶里程、就业、空气质量和预期寿命。

结论

本研究确定了关键经济指标,这些指标可以表征通过建设环境促进身体活动的经济价值。进一步的工作可以证明这些关键指标的有效性、可行性和实用性,特别是为社区设计决策提供信息。

相似文献

1
Priorities and Indicators for Economic Evaluation of Built Environment Interventions to Promote Physical Activity.促进身体活动的建成环境干预措施经济评估的优先事项和指标
J Phys Act Health. 2021 Jul 9;18(9):1088-1096. doi: 10.1123/jpah.2021-0191. Print 2021 Sep 1.
2
Development of physical activity and food built environment quality indicators for chronic diseases in Argentina.阿根廷开发身体活动和食物建成环境质量指标以预防慢性病。
Health Promot Int. 2021 Dec 23;36(6):1554-1565. doi: 10.1093/heapro/daaa138.
3
Longitudinal impact of changes in the residential built environment on physical activity: findings from the ENABLE London cohort study.居住环境变化对身体活动的纵向影响:来自 ENABLE 伦敦队列研究的发现。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2020 Aug 1;17(1):96. doi: 10.1186/s12966-020-01003-9.
4
Cross-sectional associations between the neighborhood built environment and physical activity in a rural setting: the Bogalusa Heart Study.农村环境中邻里建成环境与身体活动的横断面关联:博加卢萨心脏研究。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Sep 18;20(1):1426. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09509-4.
5
What is the cross-sectional association of geospatially derived walkability with walking for leisure and transport?基于地理空间得出的步行便利性与休闲及交通步行之间的横断面关联是什么?
PLoS One. 2025 Mar 21;20(3):e0320202. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0320202. eCollection 2025.
6
Prioritizing a research agenda on built environments and physical activity: a twin panel Delphi consensus process with researchers and knowledge users.制定关于建筑环境和身体活动的研究议程:研究人员和知识使用者的双面板德尔菲共识过程。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2023 Dec 7;20(1):144. doi: 10.1186/s12966-023-01533-y.
7
A Framework for Measuring Neighborhood Walkability for Older Adults-A Delphi Consensus Study.老年人邻里步行适宜性测量框架——德尔菲共识研究
J Urban Health. 2024 Dec;101(6):1188-1199. doi: 10.1007/s11524-024-00910-7. Epub 2024 Sep 3.
8
Influence and Mechanism of a Multi-Scale Built Environment on the Leisure Activities of the Elderly: Evidence from Hefei City in China.多尺度建成环境对老年人休闲活动的影响及作用机制——来自中国合肥市的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 28;19(15):9237. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19159237.
9
Cardiovascular diseases in middle aged and older adults in China: the joint effects and mediation of different types of physical exercise and neighborhood greenness and walkability.中国中老年人心血管疾病:不同类型的身体活动与邻里绿化和可步行性的联合作用及中介作用。
Environ Res. 2018 Nov;167:175-183. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2018.07.003. Epub 2018 Jul 3.
10
Priorities of Municipal Policy Makers in Relation to Physical Activity and the Built Environment: A Latent Class Analysis.城市政策制定者在体育活动与建成环境方面的优先事项:一项潜在类别分析
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2016 May-Jun;22(3):221-30. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000000289.

引用本文的文献

1
Physical Activity-Friendly Policies and Community Design Features in the US, 2014 and 2021.2014 年和 2021 年美国的促进身体活动的政策和社区设计特点
Prev Chronic Dis. 2023 Aug 17;20:E72. doi: 10.5888/pcd20.220397.

本文引用的文献

1
Economics of Interventions to Increase Active Travel to School: A Community Guide Systematic Review.增加步行或骑行上学的干预措施的经济学:社区指南系统评价
Am J Prev Med. 2021 Jan;60(1):e27-e40. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2020.08.002.
2
Developing the Active Communities Tool to Implement the Community Guide's Built Environment Recommendation for Increasing Physical Activity.开发积极社区工具以实施《社区指南》的营造环境建议,以增加身体活动。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2020 Nov 12;17:E142. doi: 10.5888/pcd17.200118.
3
Routine Assessment of Health Impacts of Local Transportation Plans: A Case Study From the City of Los Angeles.常规评估地方交通计划对健康的影响:来自洛杉矶市的案例研究。
Am J Public Health. 2019 Mar;109(3):490-496. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2018.304879. Epub 2019 Jan 24.
4
Percentage of Deaths Associated With Inadequate Physical Activity in the United States.美国与身体活动不足相关的死亡百分比。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2018 Mar 29;15:E38. doi: 10.5888/pcd18.170354.
5
Evaluating Comprehensive State Tobacco Prevention and Control Programs Using an Outcome Indicator Framework.使用结果指标框架评估综合州烟草预防与控制项目。
Health Promot Pract. 2019 Mar;20(2):214-222. doi: 10.1177/1524839918760557. Epub 2018 Mar 22.
6
Identifying mechanisms for facilitating knowledge to action strategies targeting the built environment.确定促进针对建成环境的知识转化为行动策略的机制。
BMC Public Health. 2017 Jan 3;17(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3954-4.
7
Recommendations for Conduct, Methodological Practices, and Reporting of Cost-effectiveness Analyses: Second Panel on Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine.《健康与医疗领域成本效益分析的实施、方法学实践和报告推荐:第二版》。
JAMA. 2016 Sep 13;316(10):1093-103. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.12195.
8
How to use the nominal group and Delphi techniques.如何使用名词组和德尔菲技术。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2016 Jun;38(3):655-62. doi: 10.1007/s11096-016-0257-x. Epub 2016 Feb 5.
9
Exploring Outcomes to Consider in Economic Evaluations of Health Promotion Programs: What Broader Non-Health Outcomes Matter Most?探索健康促进项目经济评估中需考虑的结果:哪些更广泛的非健康结果最为重要?
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Jul 14;15:266. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-0908-y.
10
Priorities of Municipal Policy Makers in Relation to Physical Activity and the Built Environment: A Latent Class Analysis.城市政策制定者在体育活动与建成环境方面的优先事项:一项潜在类别分析
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2016 May-Jun;22(3):221-30. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000000289.