• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Routine Assessment of Health Impacts of Local Transportation Plans: A Case Study From the City of Los Angeles.常规评估地方交通计划对健康的影响:来自洛杉矶市的案例研究。
Am J Public Health. 2019 Mar;109(3):490-496. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2018.304879. Epub 2019 Jan 24.
2
Application of an evidence-based tool to evaluate health impacts of changes to the built environment.应用基于证据的工具评估建筑环境变化对健康的影响。
Can J Public Health. 2014 Jul 11;106(1 Suppl 1):eS26-34. doi: 10.17269/cjph.106.4338.
3
Public awareness of and support for infrastructure changes designed to increase walking and biking in Los Angeles County.洛杉矶县民众对旨在增加步行和骑行的基础设施变革的认知与支持。
Prev Med. 2015 Mar;72:70-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.12.033. Epub 2015 Jan 5.
4
Health impact assessment of cycling network expansions in European cities.欧洲城市自行车网络扩展的健康影响评估。
Prev Med. 2018 Apr;109:62-70. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.12.011. Epub 2018 Jan 9.
5
Health impact assessment of increasing public transport and cycling use in Barcelona: a morbidity and burden of disease approach.巴塞罗那增加公共交通和自行车使用对健康的影响评估:一种发病率和疾病负担的方法。
Prev Med. 2013 Nov;57(5):573-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2013.07.021. Epub 2013 Aug 9.
6
Health Impacts of Urban Bicycling in Mexico.墨西哥城市骑行的健康影响
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 26;18(5):2300. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18052300.
7
Uncovering physical activity trade-offs in transportation policy: A spatial agent-based model of Bogotá, Colombia.揭示交通政策中的体力活动权衡:以哥伦比亚波哥大为案例的空间基于主体模型。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2024 May 8;21(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s12966-024-01570-1.
8
Traffic-related air pollution and health co-benefits of alternative transport in Adelaide, South Australia.澳大利亚南澳阿德莱德的交通相关空气污染与替代交通的健康协同效益。
Environ Int. 2015 Jan;74:281-90. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2014.10.004. Epub 2014 Nov 9.
9
Improving health through policies that promote active travel: a review of evidence to support integrated health impact assessment.通过促进积极出行的政策改善健康:支持综合健康影响评估的证据综述。
Environ Int. 2011 May;37(4):766-77. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2011.02.003.
10
Health Impacts of Active Transportation in Europe.欧洲主动出行的健康影响。
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 1;11(3):e0149990. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149990. eCollection 2016.

引用本文的文献

1
Walkability and urban built environments-a systematic review of health impact assessments (HIA).步行性与城市建成环境——健康影响评估(HIA)的系统综述。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Mar 17;23(1):518. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15394-4.
2
Assessing the health impacts of the urban expansion of small cities in China: A case study of Jiawang.评估中国小城市城区扩张对健康的影响:以贾汪为例。
PLoS One. 2022 Dec 22;17(12):e0279470. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279470. eCollection 2022.
3
Priorities and Indicators for Economic Evaluation of Built Environment Interventions to Promote Physical Activity.促进身体活动的建成环境干预措施经济评估的优先事项和指标
J Phys Act Health. 2021 Jul 9;18(9):1088-1096. doi: 10.1123/jpah.2021-0191. Print 2021 Sep 1.
4
Targeting Youth Transportation Equity and Self-Efficacy to Reduce Youth Physical Activity Disparities: A Novel Approach for a Public Health 3.0 Agenda.以青年交通公平性和自我效能感为目标以减少青年身体活动差异:公共卫生3.0议程的新方法。
Am J Public Health. 2021 May;111(5):795-798. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2020.306143.

本文引用的文献

1
Systematic literature review of built environment effects on physical activity and active transport - an update and new findings on health equity.建成环境对身体活动和主动出行影响的系统文献综述——健康公平性的更新与新发现
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017 Nov 16;14(1):158. doi: 10.1186/s12966-017-0613-9.
2
Health and greenhouse gas mitigation benefits of ambitious expansion of cycling, walking, and transit in California.加利福尼亚州大力拓展自行车道、人行道及公共交通对健康和温室气体减排的益处。
J Transp Health. 2017 Sep;6:490-500. doi: 10.1016/j.jth.2017.04.011.
3
Transportation Matters: A Health Impact Assessment in Rural New Mexico.交通问题:新墨西哥州农村地区的健康影响评估
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Jun 13;14(6):629. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14060629.
4
Integrating Health and Transportation in Nashville, Tennessee, USA: From Policy to Projects.美国田纳西州纳什维尔市的健康与交通整合:从政策到项目
J Transp Health. 2017 Mar;4:325-333. doi: 10.1016/j.jth.2017.01.002. Epub 2017 Feb 8.
5
The Integrated Transport and Health Impact Modeling Tool in Nashville, Tennessee, USA: Implementation Steps and Lessons Learned.美国田纳西州纳什维尔的综合交通与健康影响建模工具:实施步骤与经验教训
J Transp Health. 2017 Jun;5:172-181. doi: 10.1016/j.jth.2016.06.009. Epub 2016 Jul 22.
6
The Effect of Light Rail Transit on Physical Activity: Design and Methods of the Travel-Related Activity in Neighborhoods Study.轻轨交通对身体活动的影响:邻里出行相关活动研究的设计与方法。
Front Public Health. 2016 Jun 9;4:103. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2016.00103. eCollection 2016.
7
Estimating Active Transportation Behaviors to Support Health Impact Assessment in the United States.估算积极的交通行为以支持美国的健康影响评估。
Front Public Health. 2016 May 2;4:63. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2016.00063. eCollection 2016.
8
Health Impacts of Increased Physical Activity from Changes in Transportation Infrastructure: Quantitative Estimates for Three Communities.交通基础设施变化带来的身体活动增加对健康的影响:三个社区的定量估计
Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:812325. doi: 10.1155/2015/812325. Epub 2015 Oct 4.
9
Predicting urban design effects on physical activity and public health: A case study.预测城市设计对身体活动和公共健康的影响:一项案例研究。
Health Place. 2015 Sep;35:79-84. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2015.07.005. Epub 2015 Aug 11.
10
Health impact assessment of active transportation: A systematic review.主动出行的健康影响评估:一项系统综述。
Prev Med. 2015 Jul;76:103-14. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2015.04.010. Epub 2015 Apr 18.

常规评估地方交通计划对健康的影响:来自洛杉矶市的案例研究。

Routine Assessment of Health Impacts of Local Transportation Plans: A Case Study From the City of Los Angeles.

机构信息

Will Nicholas, Irene Vidyanti, and Emily Caesar are with the Los Angeles County Department of Public Health, Los Angeles, CA. Neil Maizlish is with University of California, Davis.

出版信息

Am J Public Health. 2019 Mar;109(3):490-496. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2018.304879. Epub 2019 Jan 24.

DOI:10.2105/AJPH.2018.304879
PMID:30676792
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6366482/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To determine the health impacts of three future scenarios of travel behavior by mode for the City of Los Angeles, California, and to provide specific recommendations for how to conduct health impact assessments of local transportation plans on a more routine basis.

METHODS

We used the Integrated Transportation and Health Impact Model to assess the health impacts of the Los Angeles Mobility Plan 2035 by using environmental impact report data on miles traveled by mode under alternative implementation scenarios as inputs. The Integrated Transportation and Health Impact Model links region-wide changes in travel behavior to population exposures to physical activity, air pollution, and traffic collisions and associated health outcomes and costs.

RESULTS

The largest impacts were on cardiovascular disease through increases in physical activity. Reductions in air pollution-related illnesses were more modest. Traffic injuries and deaths increased across all scenarios but were greatly reduced through targeted roadway safety enhancements accounted for outside the model.

CONCLUSIONS

By establishing miles travelled as the metric for transportation impacts of statewide and regional plans, states can leverage existing data sources to more routinely consider health impacts as part of environmental impact reports. While not insurmountable, challenges remain regarding the incorporation of land use and roadway safety strategies into health impact estimates.

摘要

目的

确定加利福尼亚州洛杉矶市三种未来出行方式情景对健康的影响,并就如何更常规地对地方交通规划进行健康影响评估提供具体建议。

方法

我们使用综合交通与健康影响模型,根据替代实施情景下各模式出行里程的环境影响报告数据作为输入,来评估 2035 年洛杉矶移动计划对健康的影响。综合交通与健康影响模型将出行行为的全区域变化与人口对体力活动、空气污染和交通碰撞及相关健康结果和成本的暴露联系起来。

结果

最大的影响是通过增加体力活动对心血管疾病的影响。与空气污染相关的疾病减少幅度较小。所有情景下的交通伤害和死亡人数都有所增加,但通过模型外的有针对性的道路安全增强措施大大减少。

结论

通过将行驶里程确定为全州和区域规划对交通影响的衡量标准,各州可以利用现有数据源更常规地将健康影响作为环境影响报告的一部分加以考虑。尽管并非不可克服,但在将土地利用和道路安全战略纳入健康影响评估方面仍存在挑战。