• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

欧盟成员国精准健康中的公民参与举措:范围综述。

Citizen engagement initiatives in precision health in the European Union member states: a scoping review.

机构信息

Section of Hygiene, University Department of Life Sciences and Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy.

Section of Hygiene, University Department of Life Sciences and Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2021 Jul 9;11(7):e045846. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045846.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045846
PMID:34244258
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8273469/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Precision health requires citizens that are empowered to orient health decisions towards their personal values, aware of the benefits and risks, and committed to sharing their personal data to trustful institutions. Effective citizen engagement initiatives are fundamental for the success of a precision health approach.

OBJECTIVE

To provide an overview of citizen engagement initiatives in precision health in European Union (EU) member states.

DESIGN

Scoping review.

METHODS

The electronic databases PubMed, Web of Science, CINAHL and Embase were searched to include articles published in English. Furthermore, desk research was conducted in English, Dutch, French, Italian and Spanish. Articles or reports regarding ongoing initiatives of citizen engagement in precision health conducted in EU member states and published from January 2015 to July 2020 were considered eligible. A quality assessment of the retrieved entries using Critical Appraisal Skills Programme tool was conducted.

RESULTS

We identified nine documents, which reported eight ongoing citizen engagement initiatives, with substantial variability. Government agencies, non-governmental organisations and scientific societies were the main organisers and funders. Most of the initiatives were conducted in the UK. Genomics was the most emphasised aspect of precision health in these initiatives. Among the identified initiatives, both in-person and digital means were reported.

CONCLUSION

Our work provides an overview of current citizen engagement initiatives in the EU that can be useful for stakeholders interested in designing and developing precision health projects enriched by meaningful citizen participation.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42020193866.

摘要

引言

精准健康需要赋予公民权力,使他们能够根据个人价值观做出健康决策,了解其益处和风险,并承诺将个人数据分享给值得信赖的机构。有效的公民参与举措是成功实施精准健康方法的基础。

目的

概述欧盟成员国在精准健康领域的公民参与举措。

设计

范围综述。

方法

检索 PubMed、Web of Science、CINAHL 和 Embase 电子数据库,以纳入 2015 年 1 月至 2020 年 7 月期间以英文发表的文章。此外,还进行了英文、荷兰文、法文、意大利文和西班牙文的桌面研究。选择符合条件的文章或报告,即关于在欧盟成员国开展的、以英文发表的、正在进行的精准健康公民参与倡议的文章或报告。使用批判性评估技巧项目工具对检索到的条目进行了质量评估。

结果

我们确定了 9 份文件,其中报告了 8 项正在进行的公民参与举措,这些举措存在很大差异。政府机构、非政府组织和科学协会是主要的组织者和资助者。大多数举措都是在英国开展的。在这些举措中,基因组学是精准健康的重点。在所确定的举措中,都报告了亲身参与和数字参与。

结论

我们的工作概述了欧盟目前的公民参与举措,对于有兴趣设计和开发具有有意义的公民参与的精准健康项目的利益相关者来说可能是有用的。

PROSPERO 注册号:CRD42020193866。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f85d/8273469/163eebab9ede/bmjopen-2020-045846f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f85d/8273469/163eebab9ede/bmjopen-2020-045846f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f85d/8273469/163eebab9ede/bmjopen-2020-045846f01.jpg

相似文献

1
Citizen engagement initiatives in precision health in the European Union member states: a scoping review.欧盟成员国精准健康中的公民参与举措:范围综述。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jul 9;11(7):e045846. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045846.
2
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
3
Citizen science or scientific citizenship? Disentangling the uses of public engagement rhetoric in national research initiatives.公民科学还是科学公民身份?厘清国家研究计划中公众参与言辞的用途。
BMC Med Ethics. 2016 Jun 4;17(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s12910-016-0117-1.
4
A scoping review of methods to measure and evaluate citizen engagement in health research.一项关于衡量和评估公民参与健康研究的方法的范围综述。
Res Involv Engagem. 2022 Dec 10;8(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s40900-022-00405-2.
5
Incorporating and evaluating citizen engagement in health research: a scoping review protocol.将公民参与纳入并评估卫生研究:范围综述方案。
Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 28;10(1):260. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01812-4.
6
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
7
An overview of Personalized Medicine landscape and policies in the European Union.欧盟个性化医学的现状与政策概述。
Eur J Public Health. 2022 Nov 29;32(6):844-851. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckac103.
8
Impact of summer programmes on the outcomes of disadvantaged or 'at risk' young people: A systematic review.暑期项目对处境不利或“有风险”的年轻人的影响:一项系统综述。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 13;20(2):e1406. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1406. eCollection 2024 Jun.
9
Public Engagement in Health Policy-Making for Older Adults: A Systematic Search and Scoping Review.公众参与老年人健康政策制定:系统检索和范围综述。
Health Expect. 2024 Aug;27(4):e70008. doi: 10.1111/hex.70008.
10
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Engagement of patients and the public in personalised prevention in Europe using genomic information: a scoping review.利用基因组信息在欧洲进行个体化预防中的患者和公众参与:范围综述。
Front Public Health. 2024 Sep 12;12:1456853. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1456853. eCollection 2024.
2
Pursuing Public Health Benefit Within National Genomic Initiatives: Learning From Different Policies.在国家基因组计划中追求公共卫生利益:借鉴不同政策。
Front Genet. 2022 May 24;13:865799. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2022.865799. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Citizens' Attitudes, Knowledge, and Educational Needs in the Field of Omics Sciences: A Systematic Literature Review.组学科学领域中公民的态度、知识和教育需求:一项系统的文献综述
Front Genet. 2020 Oct 23;11:570649. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2020.570649. eCollection 2020.
2
Citizen science to further precision medicine: from vision to implementation.公民科学推动精准医学:从愿景到实践。
JAMIA Open. 2019 Dec 3;3(1):2-8. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooz060. eCollection 2020 Apr.
3
European citizens' perspectives on direct-to-consumer genetic testing: an updated systematic review.
欧洲公民对直接面向消费者的基因检测的看法:一项最新的系统综述。
Eur J Public Health. 2020 May 3;33(5):947-53. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckz246.
4
Public Involvement in Global Genomics Research: A Scoping Review.公众参与全球基因组学研究:一项范围综述
Front Public Health. 2019 Apr 9;7:79. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2019.00079. eCollection 2019.
5
Personal Genome Project UK (PGP-UK): a research and citizen science hybrid project in support of personalized medicine.英国个人基因组计划(PGP-UK):支持个性化医疗的研究与公民科学混合项目。
BMC Med Genomics. 2018 Nov 27;11(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s12920-018-0423-1.
6
Attitudes of publics who are unwilling to donate DNA data for research.不愿为研究捐赠DNA数据的公众的态度。
Eur J Med Genet. 2019 May;62(5):316-323. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmg.2018.11.014. Epub 2018 Nov 23.
7
PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation.PRISMA 扩展用于范围审查 (PRISMA-ScR): 清单和解释。
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Oct 2;169(7):467-473. doi: 10.7326/M18-0850. Epub 2018 Sep 4.
8
Biobanking in British Columbia: discussions of the future of personalized medicine through deliberative public engagement.不列颠哥伦比亚省的生物样本库:通过公众参与协商讨论个性化医疗的未来。
Per Med. 2008 May;5(3):285-296. doi: 10.2217/17410541.5.3.285.
9
Is the UK public ready for genetic medicine?英国公众对基因药物做好准备了吗?
Per Med. 2008 Jan;5(1):65-76. doi: 10.2217/17410541.5.1.65.
10
Bringing personalized medicine to the community through public engagement.通过公众参与将个性化医疗引入社区。
Per Med. 2013 Sep;10(7):647-659. doi: 10.2217/pme.13.65.