Nunn Jack S, Tiller Jane, Fransquet Peter, Lacaze Paul
School of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Public Health Genomics, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Front Public Health. 2019 Apr 9;7:79. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2019.00079. eCollection 2019.
Public involvement in research occurs when the public, patients, or research participants are actively contributing to the research process. Public involvement has been acknowledged as a key priority for prominent human genomics research initiatives in many different countries. However, to date, there has been no detailed analysis or review of the features, methods, and impacts of public involvement occurring in human genomics research projects worldwide. Here, we review the reported public involvement in 96 human genomics projects (initiatives), based on a database of initiatives hosted by the Global Alliance for Genomics and Health, according to information reported on public domain websites. To conduct the scoping review, we applied a structured categorization of criteria to all information extracted from the search. We found that only a third of all initiatives reported public involvement in any capacity (32/96, 33%). In those reporting public involvement, we found considerable variation in both the methods and tasks of involvement. Some noteworthy initiatives reported diverse and comprehensive ways of involving the public, occurring through different stages of the research project cycle. Three notable initiatives reported a total of eight distinct impacts as a result of involving people. Our findings suggest there would be intrinsic value in having more public involvement occur in human genomics research worldwide. We also suggest that more systematic ways of reporting and evaluating involvement would be highly beneficial, to help develop best practices.
当公众、患者或研究参与者积极参与研究过程时,即发生了公众参与研究。在许多不同国家,公众参与已被视为重要人类基因组学研究计划的关键优先事项。然而,迄今为止,尚未对全球人类基因组学研究项目中公众参与的特征、方法和影响进行详细分析或审查。在此,我们根据公开网站上报告的信息,基于全球基因组学与健康联盟主办的计划数据库,对96个人类基因组学项目(计划)中报告的公众参与情况进行了审查。为了进行范围界定审查,我们对从搜索中提取的所有信息应用了结构化的标准分类。我们发现,所有计划中只有三分之一报告了任何形式的公众参与(32/96,33%)。在那些报告了公众参与的计划中,我们发现参与的方法和任务存在很大差异。一些值得注意的计划报告了通过研究项目周期的不同阶段让公众参与的多样且全面的方式。三个显著的计划报告称,由于让公众参与,总共产生了八种不同的影响。我们的研究结果表明,在全球人类基因组学研究中让更多公众参与具有内在价值。我们还建议,采用更系统的方式报告和评估参与情况将非常有益,有助于制定最佳实践。