• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

初级保健研究——影响政策并将其付诸实施。

Primary Care Research - Influencing and Implementing Into Policy.

作者信息

Kendall Sally

机构信息

University of Kent, Centre for Health Services Studies (CHSS), George Allen building, Canterbury, CT2 7NZ, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Zdr Varst. 2021 Jun 28;60(3):138-144. doi: 10.2478/sjph-2021-0020. eCollection 2021 Sep.

DOI:10.2478/sjph-2021-0020
PMID:34249159
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8256767/
Abstract

This editorial describes how research in primary health care can be used to influence policy. It draws on previous literature to give an example from the UK of how research in one part of primary care, the health-visiting service, has endeavoured to use evidence to influence policy and practice. The editorial considers frameworks for policy implementation such as Bardach's eight phase approach and concepts that can inform policy implementation such as Lipsky's Street-Level Bureaucrat approach.

摘要

这篇社论描述了初级卫生保健研究如何能够用于影响政策制定。它借鉴以往文献，以英国为例，阐述了初级保健的一个领域——健康访视服务——的研究是如何努力运用证据来影响政策和实践的。这篇社论探讨了政策实施的框架，如巴达克的八阶段方法，以及可为政策实施提供参考的概念，如利普斯基的街头官僚方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d8cc/8256767/91c5968cc55e/sjph-60-138-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d8cc/8256767/91c5968cc55e/sjph-60-138-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d8cc/8256767/91c5968cc55e/sjph-60-138-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Primary Care Research - Influencing and Implementing Into Policy.初级保健研究——影响政策并将其付诸实施。
Zdr Varst. 2021 Jun 28;60(3):138-144. doi: 10.2478/sjph-2021-0020. eCollection 2021 Sep.
2
Street-level bureaucracy and policy implementation in community public health nursing: a qualitative study of the experiences of student and novice health visitors.社区公共卫生护理中的基层官僚作风与政策实施：对学生和新手健康访视员经历的定性研究
Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2016 Nov;17(6):586-598. doi: 10.1017/S1463423616000220. Epub 2016 Aug 4.
3
Conducting health policy analysis in primary care research: turning clinical ideas into action.在初级保健研究中开展卫生政策分析：将临床想法转化为行动。
Fam Med Community Health. 2019 Mar 22;7(2):e000076. doi: 10.1136/fmch-2018-000076. eCollection 2019.
4
Technical analysis, contestation and politics in policy agenda setting and implementation: the rise and fall of primary care maternal services from Ghana's capitation policy.政策议程设定与实施中的技术分析、争论与政治：加纳人头税政策下初级保健孕产妇服务的兴衰
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Jul 29;16:323. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1576-2.
5
National Service Frameworks and UK general practitioners: street-level bureaucrats at work?国家服务框架与英国全科医生：一线官僚在工作吗？
Sociol Health Illn. 2004 Nov;26(7):951-75. doi: 10.1111/j.0141-9889.2004.00424.x.
6
'We are bitter but we are satisfied': nurses as street-level bureaucrats in South Africa.“我们很痛苦，但我们很满足”：南非护士作为一线官僚
Soc Sci Med. 2004 Sep;59(6):1251-61. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2003.12.020.
7
Preparing the sexual health workforce to deliver integrated services: is education the answer? A qualitative study exploring the impact of sexual health education on developing integrated policy and practice.培养性健康服务人员以提供综合服务：教育是答案吗？一项探索性健康教育对制定综合政策与实践之影响的定性研究。
Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2017 May;18(3):270-281. doi: 10.1017/S1463423617000123. Epub 2017 Mar 14.
8
Home level bureaucracy: moving beyond the 'street' to uncover the ways that place shapes the ways that community public health nurses implement domestic abuse policy.家庭层面的官僚主义：超越“街头”，揭示场所如何塑造社区公共卫生护士实施家庭暴力政策的方式。
Sociol Health Illn. 2019 Sep;41(7):1426-1443. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.12968. Epub 2019 Jun 26.
9
Implementing a Basic Package of Health Services in post-conflict Liberia: perceptions of key stakeholders.在冲突后利比里亚实施基本卫生服务包：主要利益攸关方的看法。
Soc Sci Med. 2013 Feb;78:42-9. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.11.026. Epub 2012 Dec 1.
10
[Charting the Brazilian Comprehensive Healthcare Policy for Men (PNAISH), from its formulation through to its implementation in local public health services].
Cien Saude Colet. 2012 Oct;17(10):2607-16. doi: 10.1590/s1413-81232012001000010.

引用本文的文献

1
Universal health coverage in Lebanon: agenda setting using Kingdon's model and a proposed legal framework for revenue allocation.黎巴嫩的全民健康覆盖：运用金登模型设定议程及提出收入分配法律框架
Front Health Serv. 2025 Aug 15;5:1627319. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2025.1627319. eCollection 2025.
2
Prevalence of risk factors for development of cardiovascular diseases in urban and rural areas of Eastern Croatia: a cross-sectional study.克罗地亚东部城乡地区心血管疾病发展风险因素的流行情况：一项横断面研究。
Cent Eur J Public Health. 2024 Mar;32(1):16-24. doi: 10.21101/cejph.a7709.
3
Perceived Barriers and Enablers of Nursing Research in the Italian Context: Findings from a Systematic Review.

本文引用的文献

1
New integrated care models in England associated with small reduction in hospital admissions in longer-term: A difference-in-differences analysis.英国新的综合护理模式与长期住院人数的小幅减少相关：一项双重差分分析。
Health Policy. 2020 Aug;124(8):826-833. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2020.06.004. Epub 2020 Jun 10.
2
Conducting health policy analysis in primary care research: turning clinical ideas into action.在初级保健研究中开展卫生政策分析：将临床想法转化为行动。
Fam Med Community Health. 2019 Mar 22;7(2):e000076. doi: 10.1136/fmch-2018-000076. eCollection 2019.
3
Models and applications for measuring the impact of health research: update of a systematic review for the Health Technology Assessment programme.
意大利背景下护理研究的感知障碍与促进因素：系统评价结果
Zdr Varst. 2022 Jun 28;61(3):181-190. doi: 10.2478/sjph-2022-0024. eCollection 2022 Sep.
衡量卫生研究影响的模型与应用：卫生技术评估项目系统评价的更新
Health Technol Assess. 2016 Oct;20(76):1-254. doi: 10.3310/hta20760.
4
Street-level bureaucracy and policy implementation in community public health nursing: a qualitative study of the experiences of student and novice health visitors.社区公共卫生护理中的基层官僚作风与政策实施：对学生和新手健康访视员经历的定性研究
Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2016 Nov;17(6):586-598. doi: 10.1017/S1463423616000220. Epub 2016 Aug 4.
5
Why health visiting? Examining the potential public health benefits from health visiting practice within a universal service: a narrative review of the literature.为什么要进行健康访视？在普遍服务框架内审视健康访视实践对公共卫生的潜在益处：文献综述。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2015 Jan;52(1):465-80. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2014.07.013. Epub 2014 Jul 27.
6
The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the Family Nurse Partnership home visiting programme for first time teenage mothers in England: a protocol for the Building Blocks randomised controlled trial.英国针对首次生育的青少年母亲的家庭护士伙伴关系家访计划的有效性和成本效益：“基石”随机对照试验方案
BMC Pediatr. 2013 Aug 6;13:114. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-13-114.
7
Schools, Skills, and Synapses.学校、技能与突触
Econ Inq. 2008 Jun;46(3):289. doi: 10.1111/j.1465-7295.2008.00163.x.
8
Describing the impact of health research: a Research Impact Framework.描述健康研究的影响：一个研究影响框架。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2006 Oct 18;6:134. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-6-134.
9
Evidence based policy: proceed with care.循证政策：谨慎行事。
BMJ. 2001 Aug 4;323(7307):275-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.323.7307.275.