• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Political Party Identification and Romantic Relationship Quality.政党认同与浪漫关系质量。
Couple Family Psychol. 2020 Sep;9(3):167-180. doi: 10.1037/cfp0000141. Epub 2020 Jun 25.
2
Political orientation, political environment, and health behaviors in the United States.美国的政治倾向、政治环境与健康行为。
Prev Med. 2018 Sep;114:95-101. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2018.06.011. Epub 2018 Jun 22.
3
Perceiving political polarization in the United States: party identity strength and attitude extremity exacerbate the perceived partisan divide.感知美国的政治极化:党派认同强度和态度极端性加剧了感知到的党派分歧。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2015 Mar;10(2):145-58. doi: 10.1177/1745691615569849.
4
Where there's smoke there's money: tobacco industry campaign contributions and U.S. Congressional voting.有烟的地方就有钱:烟草行业的竞选捐款与美国国会投票
Am J Prev Med. 2004 Dec;27(5):363-72. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2004.08.014.
5
Political differences in past, present, and future life satisfaction: Republicans are more sensitive than democrats to political climate.过去、现在和未来生活满意度中的政治差异:共和党人比民主党人对政治气候更敏感。
PLoS One. 2014 Jun 5;9(6):e98854. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0098854. eCollection 2014.
6
Political voting in the United Kingdom 2019 general election and risk of living with obesity in a nationally representative sample.2019 年英国大选的政治投票与全国代表性样本中肥胖风险的关系。
Int J Obes (Lond). 2024 Oct;48(10):1430-1437. doi: 10.1038/s41366-024-01569-5. Epub 2024 Jun 26.
7
Democrats and republicans can be differentiated from their faces.从他们的长相就能区分出民主党人和共和党人。
PLoS One. 2010 Jan 18;5(1):e8733. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0008733.
8
Who votes for public health? U.S. senator characteristics associated with voting in concordance with public health policy recommendations (1998-2013).谁为公共卫生投票?与按照公共卫生政策建议进行投票相关的美国参议员特征(1998 - 2013年)
SSM Popul Health. 2016 Dec 23;3:136-140. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2016.12.011. eCollection 2017 Dec.
9
Physicians' political preferences and the delivery of end of life care in the United States: retrospective observational study.医生的政治倾向与美国的临终关怀服务提供:回顾性观察研究。
BMJ. 2018 Apr 11;361:k1161. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k1161.
10
A sociocultural approach to voting: Construing voting as a duty to others predicts political interest and engagement.一种关于投票的社会文化方法:将投票视为对他人的责任,可以预测政治兴趣和参与度。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 May 28;121(22):e2215051121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2215051121. Epub 2024 May 20.

本文引用的文献

1
Religion in families 1999 to 2009: A relational spirituality framework.1999年至2009年家庭中的宗教:一种关系性灵性框架。
J Marriage Fam. 2010 Aug;72(4):805-827. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00732.x.
2
The role of leaders' working alliance in premarital education.领导者工作联盟在婚前教育中的作用。
J Fam Psychol. 2011 Feb;25(1):49-57. doi: 10.1037/a0022084.
3
Should I stay or should I go? Predicting dating relationship stability from four aspects of commitment.我该留下还是该离开?从四个方面预测约会关系的稳定性。
J Fam Psychol. 2010 Oct;24(5):543-50. doi: 10.1037/a0021008.
4
Development and validation of a brief version of the dyadic adjustment scale with a nonparametric item analysis model.采用非参数项目分析模型的二元调适量表简版的编制与验证
Psychol Assess. 2005 Mar;17(1):15-27. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.17.1.15.
5
Communication, conflict, and commitment: insights on the foundations of relationship success from a national survey.沟通、冲突与承诺:来自一项全国性调查的关于关系成功基础的见解
Fam Process. 2002 Winter;41(4):659-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1545-5300.2002.00659.x.
6
Cohabitation, marriage, divorce, and remarriage in the United States.美国的同居、结婚、离婚和再婚情况。
Vital Health Stat 23. 2002 Jul(22):1-93.

政党认同与浪漫关系质量。

Political Party Identification and Romantic Relationship Quality.

作者信息

Fangmeier Troy L, Stanley Scott M, Knopp Kayla, Rhoades Galena K

机构信息

University of Denver.

Veterans Administration, San Diego Healthcare System.

出版信息

Couple Family Psychol. 2020 Sep;9(3):167-180. doi: 10.1037/cfp0000141. Epub 2020 Jun 25.

DOI:10.1037/cfp0000141
PMID:34249472
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8266382/
Abstract

Although there are studies on voting similarity in mate selection, very little research has examined party identification and relationship quality. We assessed associations between reports of personal and partner voting behavior (Democrat, Republican, or Independent) and both relationship adjustment and commitment to one's partner. We used a national (U.S.) sample of individuals ( = 510) in their 20s and 30s who were mostly in different-sex, serious relationships ( duration = 5.25 years; 50% married). Controlling for age, college graduation, income, religiosity, minority status, and duration of relationship, voting Republican was associated with higher levels of commitment compared to voting Democrat. Similarly, being partnered with someone voting Republican was associated with higher relationship adjustment and commitment compared to being partnered with someone voting Democrat. Notably, differences in commitment were found only among those who were not already married or engaged. Findings were largely consistent with numerous online reports of survey data that have shown modestly greater relationship quality among those who report being politically conservative. While research has shown that people are less attracted to those who vote differently and that voting differently can be associated with lower relationship quality, we did not generally find perceived voting similarity to be associated with relationship adjustment or commitment. There was one exception: In exploratory analyses, Republicans paired with Democrats tended to report substantially lower relationship adjustment than if paired with Republicans. Implications for political differences among intimate partners and clinical work around these themes are discussed.

摘要

虽然有关于择偶中投票相似性的研究,但很少有研究考察党派认同与关系质量之间的联系。我们评估了个人及伴侣投票行为(民主党、共和党或无党派)报告与关系调适及对伴侣的承诺之间的关联。我们使用了一个来自美国全国的样本,样本中的个体年龄在二十多岁和三十多岁,大多处于异性的稳定恋爱关系中(恋爱时长为5.25年;50%已婚)。在控制了年龄、大学毕业情况、收入、宗教信仰、少数族裔身份以及恋爱时长后,与投票给民主党相比,投票给共和党与更高水平的承诺相关。同样,与投票给民主党的伴侣在一起相比,与投票给共和党的伴侣在一起与更高的关系调适及承诺相关。值得注意的是,承诺方面的差异仅在那些尚未结婚或订婚的人当中被发现。研究结果在很大程度上与众多在线调查数据报告一致,这些报告显示,在那些自称政治上保守的人当中,关系质量略高。虽然研究表明人们对投票不同的人吸引力较低,且投票不同可能与较低的关系质量相关,但我们总体上并未发现感知到的投票相似性与关系调适或承诺有关联。有一个例外:在探索性分析中,与共和党人配对的共和党人与民主党人配对相比,往往报告关系调适水平要低得多。本文还讨论了亲密伴侣间政治差异的影响以及围绕这些主题的临床工作。