Moradi Kashkooli Farshad, Soltani M, Momeni Mohammad Masoud, Rahmim Arman
Department of Mechanical Engineering, K. N. Toosi University of Technology, Tehran, Iran.
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, School of Optometry and Vision Science, Faculty of Science, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada.
Front Oncol. 2021 Jun 24;11:655781. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.655781. eCollection 2021.
Nano-sized drug delivery systems (NSDDSs) offer a promising therapeutic technology with sufficient biocompatibility, stability, and drug-loading rates towards efficient drug delivery to solid tumors. We aim to apply a multi-scale computational model for evaluating drug delivery to predict treatment efficacy.
Three strategies for drug delivery, namely conventional chemotherapy (one-stage), as well as chemotherapy through two- and three-stage NSDDSs, were simulated and compared. A geometric model of the tumor and the capillary network was obtained by processing a real image. Subsequently, equations related to intravascular and interstitial flows as well as drug transport in tissue were solved by considering real conditions as well as details such as drug binding to cells and cellular uptake. Finally, the role of periodic treatments was investigated considering tumor recurrence between treatments. The impact of different parameters, nanoparticle (NP) size, binding affinity of drug, and the kinetics of release rate, were additionally investigated to determine their therapeutic efficacy.
Using NPs considerably increases the fraction of killed cells (FKCs) inside the tumor compared to conventional chemotherapy. Tumoral FKCs for two-stage DDS with smaller NP size (20nm) is higher than that of larger NPs (100nm), in all investigate release rates. Slower and continuous release of the chemotherapeutic agents from NPs have better treatment outcomes in comparison with faster release rate. In three-stage DDS, for intermediate and higher binding affinities, it is desirable for the secondary particle to be released at a faster rate, and the drug with slower rate. In lower binding affinities, high release rates have better performance. Results also demonstrate that after 5 treatments with three-stage DDS, 99.6% of tumor cells (TCs) are killed, while two-stage DDS and conventional chemotherapy kill 95.6% and 88.5% of tumor cells in the same period, respectively.
The presented framework has the potential to enable decision making for new drugs computational modeling of treatment responses and has the potential to aid oncologists with personalized treatment plans towards more optimal treatment outcomes.
纳米级药物递送系统(NSDDSs)提供了一种有前景的治疗技术,具有足够的生物相容性、稳定性和载药率,可实现向实体瘤的高效药物递送。我们旨在应用多尺度计算模型来评估药物递送,以预测治疗效果。
模拟并比较了三种药物递送策略,即传统化疗(单阶段)以及通过两阶段和三阶段NSDDSs进行的化疗。通过处理真实图像获得肿瘤和毛细血管网络的几何模型。随后,通过考虑实际情况以及诸如药物与细胞结合和细胞摄取等细节,求解与血管内和间质流动以及组织中药物转运相关的方程。最后,考虑治疗之间的肿瘤复发,研究了周期性治疗的作用。此外,还研究了不同参数(纳米颗粒(NP)大小、药物结合亲和力和释放速率动力学)的影响,以确定它们的治疗效果。
与传统化疗相比,使用纳米颗粒可显著增加肿瘤内被杀灭细胞的比例(FKCs)。在所有研究的释放速率下,具有较小NP尺寸(20nm)的两阶段药物递送系统的肿瘤FKCs高于较大NP(100nm)的情况。与较快的释放速率相比,化疗药物从纳米颗粒中较慢且持续的释放具有更好的治疗效果。在三阶段药物递送系统中,对于中等和较高的结合亲和力,次级颗粒以较快的速率释放且药物以较慢的速率释放是理想的。在较低的结合亲和力下,高释放速率具有更好的性能。结果还表明,在使用三阶段药物递送系统进行5次治疗后,99.6%的肿瘤细胞(TCs)被杀灭,而两阶段药物递送系统和传统化疗在同一时期分别杀灭95.6%和88.5%的肿瘤细胞。
所提出的框架有潜力为新药的决策、治疗反应的计算建模提供支持,并有可能帮助肿瘤学家制定个性化治疗方案以实现更优的治疗效果。