• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Development and Pilot Validation of an Instrument Assessing Sensorimotor Skills for Percutaneous Gastral Puncture.经皮胃穿刺感觉运动技能评估工具的开发与初步验证
Visc Med. 2021 Jun;37(3):212-218. doi: 10.1159/000511350. Epub 2020 Nov 4.
2
[Comparison of safety insertion techniques of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in nurses and physicians - a non-randomized interventional pilot study on a simulation model].护士与医生经皮内镜下胃造口术安全插入技术的比较——基于模拟模型的非随机干预性初步研究
Z Gastroenterol. 2018 Mar;56(3):239-248. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-120350. Epub 2017 Nov 7.
3
[Interprofessional knowledge and skills training of the insertion technique for the PEG placement on simulators - development and testing of a national curriculum for physicians and nurses].
Z Gastroenterol. 2021 Nov;59(11):1163-1172. doi: 10.1055/a-1332-2356. Epub 2021 Nov 12.
4
Assessing nursing staff's competences in mobility support in nursing-home care: development and psychometric testing of the Kinaesthetics Competence (KC) observation instrument.评估养老院护理中护理人员在移动支持方面的能力:动觉能力(KC)观察工具的开发与心理测量测试
BMC Nurs. 2016 Nov 22;15:65. doi: 10.1186/s12912-016-0185-z. eCollection 2016.
5
Development of a patient-reported outcome measure for psychotherapeutic interventions in people with seizures: A mixed methods study.开发一种针对癫痫患者心理治疗干预的患者报告结局测量工具:混合方法研究。
Epilepsy Behav. 2019 Oct;99:106464. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2019.106464. Epub 2019 Aug 14.
6
Bi-lingual content validation of the Non-Technical Skills for Operating Room Nurses (NOTSORN) tool: A Delphi study.手术室护士非技术技能(NOTSORN)工具的双语内容验证:一项德尔菲研究。
Int J Nurs Stud Adv. 2024 Jun 20;7:100218. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2024.100218. eCollection 2024 Dec.
7
Development of a postsurgical patient-reported outcome instrument for women with vulvar neoplasia.一种用于外阴肿瘤患者的术后患者报告结局工具的开发。
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2012 Nov;39(6):E489-98. doi: 10.1188/12.ONF.E489-E498.
8
Determining content validity of a self-report instrument for adolescents using a heterogeneous expert panel.使用异质性专家小组确定青少年自陈式量表的内容效度。
Nurs Res. 2007 Sep-Oct;56(5):361-6. doi: 10.1097/01.NNR.0000289505.30037.91.
9
Nurses' knowledge, skills and personal attributes for competent health education practice: An instrument development and psychometric validation study.护士进行健康教育实践所需的知识、技能和个人特质:工具的开发和心理测量验证研究。
J Adv Nurs. 2021 Feb;77(2):715-728. doi: 10.1111/jan.14632. Epub 2020 Nov 27.
10
Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric validation of the Flodén ATODAI instrument in the North American context.弗洛登ATODAI工具在北美背景下的跨文化适应与心理测量学验证。
BMC Nurs. 2020 Jun 22;19:55. doi: 10.1186/s12912-020-00444-8. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

1
Risk factors for early and late procedure-related adverse events in percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: A single center, retrospective study.经皮内镜下胃造口术早期和晚期手术相关不良事件的危险因素:一项单中心回顾性研究。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Feb;34(2):404-409. doi: 10.1111/jgh.14407. Epub 2018 Aug 23.
2
[Comparison of safety insertion techniques of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in nurses and physicians - a non-randomized interventional pilot study on a simulation model].护士与医生经皮内镜下胃造口术安全插入技术的比较——基于模拟模型的非随机干预性初步研究
Z Gastroenterol. 2018 Mar;56(3):239-248. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-120350. Epub 2017 Nov 7.
3
Guidelines for privileging, credentialing, and proctoring to perform GI endoscopy.进行胃肠内镜检查的特权授予、资质认定及监考指南。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 Feb;85(2):273-281. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.10.036.
4
[Testing clinical competencies in undergraduate nursing education using Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) – a literature review of international practice].[使用客观结构化临床考试(OSCE)测试本科护理教育中的临床能力——国际实践的文献综述]
Pflege. 2016 Jul;29(4):193-203. doi: 10.1024/1012-5302/a000496. Epub 2016 May 30.
5
Training and competence assessment in GI endoscopy: a systematic review.胃肠内镜培训与能力评估:系统评价。
Gut. 2016 Apr;65(4):607-15. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-307173. Epub 2015 Jan 30.
6
Recommendations for reporting the results of studies of instrument and scale development and testing.关于报告工具和量表开发与测试研究结果的建议。
J Adv Nurs. 2014 Sep;70(9):1970-1979. doi: 10.1111/jan.12402. Epub 2014 Mar 30.
7
Virtual reality simulation training for health professions trainees in gastrointestinal endoscopy.面向胃肠内镜检查领域卫生专业学员的虚拟现实模拟训练
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jun 13(6):CD008237. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008237.pub2.
8
Effectiveness of a novel endoscopy training concept.新型内镜培训概念的有效性。
Endoscopy. 2011 Sep;43(9):802-7. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1256372. Epub 2011 May 27.
9
The Mayo Colonoscopy Skills Assessment Tool: validation of a unique instrument to assess colonoscopy skills in trainees.Mayo 结肠镜检查技能评估工具:验证一种用于评估学员结肠镜检查技能的独特工具。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Dec;72(6):1125-33, 1133.e1-3. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.09.001.
10
Simulator training improves practical skills in therapeutic GI endoscopy: results from a randomized, blinded, controlled study.模拟器训练可提高治疗性胃肠内镜的实践技能:一项随机、盲法、对照研究的结果。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2009 Nov;70(5):835-45. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.01.001. Epub 2009 Jun 25.

经皮胃穿刺感觉运动技能评估工具的开发与初步验证

Development and Pilot Validation of an Instrument Assessing Sensorimotor Skills for Percutaneous Gastral Puncture.

作者信息

Engelke Monika, Grund Karl Ernst, Schilling Dieter, Beilenhoff Ulrike, Stebner Ferdinand, Kugler Christiane

机构信息

Department of Nursing Science, University Witten/Herdecke, Witten, Germany.

Center of Medical Research, University Clinics Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.

出版信息

Visc Med. 2021 Jun;37(3):212-218. doi: 10.1159/000511350. Epub 2020 Nov 4.

DOI:10.1159/000511350
PMID:34250079
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8237800/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The acquisition of sensorimotor skills, so-called "technical skills", plays an essential part in the professional and continuing educational training of medical and nursing staff. Facilities turn to simulator training to promote the safe and accurate performance of endoscopic examinations. Thus, this study aimed to develop and pilot-test a corresponding assessment instrument to monitor necessary sensorimotor or "technical" skills of the examiner for a safe percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (AS-PEG).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Instrument development and pilot validation involved four stages: identification of potential items and initial draft of the AS-PEG; expert panel with 11 experts (content validity index [CVI] calculated); empirical validation using a quasi-experimental intervention on simulators; revision of the pilot AS-PEG taking expert assessment, and empirical testing into consideration.

RESULTS

The initial instrument yielded 13 categories and 44 items describing the PEG procedure. Experts rated 30 out of 44 items (68%) extremely or very important for the safety of the puncture of the stomach. Initial item-CVIs ranged from 0.00 to 1.00; scale-CVI was 0.61. Twenty-four trainees (7 physicians, 17 nurses) participated in the pilot simulation study. On average, 8:25 min were required for PEG placement (min-max 5:59-13:38 min, SD = 1:43). The revised AS-PEG version was reduced to 14 items with a range of the item CVI from 0.8 to 1.0, and a scale-CVI of 0.90.

CONCLUSION

The AS-PEG instrument facilitates the evaluation of sensorimotor skills during percutaneous gastric puncture procedures within the context of PEG placement, across professions and without relating to the number of procedures previously performed. The instrument is economical and shows satisfying content validity.

摘要

引言

获得感觉运动技能,即所谓的“技术技能”,在医护人员的专业和继续教育培训中起着至关重要的作用。医疗机构采用模拟培训来促进内镜检查的安全准确操作。因此,本研究旨在开发并进行相应评估工具的预试验,以监测检查者进行安全经皮内镜下胃造口术(AS-PEG)所需的感觉运动或“技术”技能。

材料与方法

工具开发和预试验验证包括四个阶段:确定潜在项目并初步起草AS-PEG;由11名专家组成的专家小组(计算内容效度指数[CVI]);使用模拟器进行准实验干预的实证验证;结合专家评估和实证测试对预试验版AS-PEG进行修订。

结果

初始工具产生了13个类别和44个描述PEG操作的项目。专家们认为44个项目中的30个(68%)对胃穿刺的安全性极其或非常重要。初始项目CVI范围为0.00至1.00;量表CVI为0.61。24名学员(7名医生,17名护士)参与了预试验模拟研究。PEG放置平均需要8:25分钟(最小-最大5:59-13:38分钟,标准差=1:43)。修订后的AS-PEG版本减少到14个项目,项目CVI范围为0.8至1.0,量表CVI为0.90。

结论

AS-PEG工具便于在PEG放置背景下评估经皮胃穿刺过程中的感觉运动技能,适用于不同专业,且与先前执行的操作数量无关。该工具经济实用,内容效度令人满意。