• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
A Diagnosis and Biotype Comparison Across the Psychosis Spectrum: Investigating Volume and Shape Amygdala-Hippocampal Differences from the B-SNIP Study.精神分裂症谱系中的诊断和生物型比较:从 B-SNIP 研究中探究杏仁核-海马体的体积和形状差异。
Schizophr Bull. 2021 Oct 21;47(6):1706-1717. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbab071.
2
Medial temporal lobe structures and hippocampal subfields in psychotic disorders: findings from the Bipolar-Schizophrenia Network on Intermediate Phenotypes (B-SNIP) study.精神障碍患者的内侧颞叶结构和海马亚区:双相-精神分裂症网络中间表型(B-SNIP)研究的结果。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2014 Jul 1;71(7):769-77. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2014.453.
3
Characterizing functional regional homogeneity (ReHo) as a B-SNIP psychosis biomarker using traditional and machine learning approaches.采用传统和机器学习方法,将功能区域同质性(ReHo)刻画为 B-SNIP 精神病生物标志物。
Schizophr Res. 2020 Jan;215:430-438. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2019.07.015. Epub 2019 Aug 19.
4
Psychosis Biotypes: Replication and Validation from the B-SNIP Consortium.精神病生物型:来自B-SNIP联盟的复制与验证
Schizophr Bull. 2022 Jan 21;48(1):56-68. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbab090.
5
Hippocampal and amygdala volumes according to psychosis stage and diagnosis: a magnetic resonance imaging study of chronic schizophrenia, first-episode psychosis, and ultra-high-risk individuals.根据精神病阶段和诊断的海马体及杏仁核体积:一项针对慢性精神分裂症、首发精神病及超高风险个体的磁共振成像研究
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2006 Feb;63(2):139-49. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.63.2.139.
6
Hippocampal volume is reduced in schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder but not in psychotic bipolar I disorder demonstrated by both manual tracing and automated parcellation (FreeSurfer).通过手动追踪和自动分割(FreeSurfer)显示,精神分裂症和分裂情感性障碍患者的海马体积减小,但双相I型精神障碍伴精神病性症状患者的海马体积未减小。
Schizophr Bull. 2015 Jan;41(1):233-49. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbu009. Epub 2014 Feb 20.
7
Gray matter volume as an intermediate phenotype for psychosis: Bipolar-Schizophrenia Network on Intermediate Phenotypes (B-SNIP).灰质体积作为精神病的中间表型:双相-精神分裂症网络中间表型(B-SNIP)。
Am J Psychiatry. 2013 Nov;170(11):1285-96. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2013.13010126.
8
White matter microstructure across brain-based biotypes for psychosis - findings from the bipolar-schizophrenia network for intermediate phenotypes.基于大脑生物型的精神病性障碍的脑白质微观结构 - 双相-精神分裂症网络中间表型研究结果。
Psychiatry Res Neuroimaging. 2021 Feb 28;308:111234. doi: 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2020.111234. Epub 2020 Dec 16.
9
Brain Structure Biomarkers in the Psychosis Biotypes: Findings From the Bipolar-Schizophrenia Network for Intermediate Phenotypes.精神分裂症生物型中的脑结构生物标志物:双相情感障碍-精神分裂症中间型网络的研究结果
Biol Psychiatry. 2017 Jul 1;82(1):26-39. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2016.08.030. Epub 2016 Aug 31.
10
Structural changes in the hippocampus and amygdala at first episode of psychosis.首发精神病中海马和杏仁核的结构变化。
Brain Imaging Behav. 2012 Mar;6(1):49-60. doi: 10.1007/s11682-011-9141-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Differentiating biomarker features and familial characteristics of B-SNIP psychosis Biotypes.鉴别B-SNIP精神病生物型的生物标志物特征和家族特征。
Transl Psychiatry. 2025 Aug 14;15(1):281. doi: 10.1038/s41398-025-03501-5.
2
Moving toward precision and personalized treatment strategies in psychiatry.迈向精神医学的精准和个性化治疗策略。
Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2025 May 9;28(5). doi: 10.1093/ijnp/pyaf025.
3
Categorical and Dimensional Approaches for Psychiatric Classification and Treatment Targeting: Considerations from Psychosis Biotypes.精神病分类和治疗靶点的分类和维度方法:精神病生物型的思考。
Adv Neurobiol. 2024;40:685-723. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-69491-2_23.
4
The Modern Concept of Schizoaffective Disorder: A Narrative Review.分裂情感性障碍的现代概念:一项叙述性综述。
Consort Psychiatr. 2024 Sep 27;5(3):42-55. doi: 10.17816/CP15513. eCollection 2024.
5
Gaze behaviors during free viewing revealed differences in visual salience processing across four major psychiatric disorders: a mega-analysis study of 1012 individuals.自由观看期间的注视行为揭示了四种主要精神疾病在视觉显著性处理方面的差异:一项对1012名个体的荟萃分析研究。
Mol Psychiatry. 2025 Apr;30(4):1594-1600. doi: 10.1038/s41380-024-02773-5. Epub 2024 Oct 11.
6
Combining neuroimaging and brain stimulation to test alternative causal pathways for nicotine addiction in schizophrenia.结合神经影像学和脑刺激技术,检验精神分裂症中尼古丁成瘾的替代因果途径。
Brain Stimul. 2024 Mar-Apr;17(2):324-332. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2024.02.020. Epub 2024 Mar 5.
7
Differentiating Biomarker Features and Familial Characteristics of B-SNIP Psychosis Biotypes.区分B-SNIP精神病变型的生物标志物特征和家族特征。
Res Sq. 2024 Jan 5:rs.3.rs-3702638. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3702638/v1.
8
Clinical characterization and differentiation of B-SNIP psychosis Biotypes: Algorithmic Diagnostics for Efficient Prescription of Treatments (ADEPT)-1.B-SNIP 精神病生物型的临床特征和鉴别:高效处方治疗的算法诊断 (ADEPT)-1。
Schizophr Res. 2023 Oct;260:143-151. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2023.08.006. Epub 2023 Aug 30.
9
Emotional scene processing in biotypes of psychosis.精神病生物型的情绪场景处理。
Psychiatry Res. 2023 Jun;324:115227. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2023.115227. Epub 2023 Apr 24.
10
Longitudinal changes of deep gray matter shape in multiple sclerosis.多发性硬化症患者深部灰质形态的纵向变化。
Neuroimage Clin. 2022;35:103137. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2022.103137. Epub 2022 Jul 29.

本文引用的文献

1
Testing Psychosis Phenotypes From Bipolar-Schizophrenia Network for Intermediate Phenotypes for Clinical Application: Biotype Characteristics and Targets.测试双相情感障碍-精神分裂症网络中用于临床应用的中间表型的精神病性表型:生物型特征与靶点
Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2020 Aug;5(8):808-818. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2020.03.011. Epub 2020 Apr 28.
2
[Not Available].[不可用]。
Can J Psychiatry. 2020 Apr;65(4):231-234. doi: 10.1177/0706743719898911. Epub 2020 Jan 21.
3
Characterizing functional regional homogeneity (ReHo) as a B-SNIP psychosis biomarker using traditional and machine learning approaches.采用传统和机器学习方法,将功能区域同质性(ReHo)刻画为 B-SNIP 精神病生物标志物。
Schizophr Res. 2020 Jan;215:430-438. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2019.07.015. Epub 2019 Aug 19.
4
Subcortical structures and cognitive dysfunction in first episode schizophrenia.首发精神分裂症的皮质下结构与认知功能障碍。
Psychiatry Res Neuroimaging. 2019 Apr 30;286:69-75. doi: 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2019.01.003. Epub 2019 Jan 12.
5
Neural correlates of cognitive deficits across developmental phases of schizophrenia.精神分裂症发展阶段认知缺陷的神经相关因素。
Neurobiol Dis. 2019 Nov;131:104353. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2018.12.013. Epub 2018 Dec 22.
6
Strategies for Advancing Disease Definition Using Biomarkers and Genetics: The Bipolar and Schizophrenia Network for Intermediate Phenotypes.利用生物标志物和遗传学推进疾病定义的策略:双相情感障碍和精神分裂症中间表型网络。
Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2017 Jan;2(1):20-27. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2016.07.005. Epub 2016 Aug 2.
7
Psychosis subgroups differ in intrinsic neural activity but not task-specific processing.精神病亚组在内在神经活动上存在差异,但在任务特异性处理上没有差异。
Schizophr Res. 2018 May;195:222-230. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2017.08.023. Epub 2017 Aug 24.
8
Linking persistent negative symptoms to amygdala-hippocampus structure in first-episode psychosis.首发精神病中持续性阴性症状与杏仁核-海马结构的关联
Transl Psychiatry. 2017 Aug 8;7(8):e1195. doi: 10.1038/tp.2017.168.
9
Brain Structure Biomarkers in the Psychosis Biotypes: Findings From the Bipolar-Schizophrenia Network for Intermediate Phenotypes.精神分裂症生物型中的脑结构生物标志物:双相情感障碍-精神分裂症中间型网络的研究结果
Biol Psychiatry. 2017 Jul 1;82(1):26-39. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2016.08.030. Epub 2016 Aug 31.
10
Does Biology Transcend the Symptom-based Boundaries of Psychosis?生物学是否超越了精神病基于症状的界限?
Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2016 Jun;39(2):165-74. doi: 10.1016/j.psc.2016.01.001. Epub 2016 Feb 28.

精神分裂症谱系中的诊断和生物型比较:从 B-SNIP 研究中探究杏仁核-海马体的体积和形状差异。

A Diagnosis and Biotype Comparison Across the Psychosis Spectrum: Investigating Volume and Shape Amygdala-Hippocampal Differences from the B-SNIP Study.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, The Royal's Institute of Mental Health Research, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

Department of Psychoeducation and Psychology, Université du Québec en Outaouais, Gatineau, QC, Canada.

出版信息

Schizophr Bull. 2021 Oct 21;47(6):1706-1717. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbab071.

DOI:10.1093/schbul/sbab071
PMID:34254147
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8530385/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Brain-based Biotypes for psychotic disorders have been developed as part of the B-SNIP consortium to create neurobiologically distinct subgroups within idiopathic psychosis, independent from traditional phenomenological diagnostic methods. In the current study, we aimed to validate the Biotype model by assessing differences in volume and shape of the amygdala and hippocampus contrasting traditional clinical diagnoses with Biotype classification.

METHODS

A total of 811 participants from 6 sites were included: probands with schizophrenia (n = 199), schizoaffective disorder (n = 122), psychotic bipolar disorder with psychosis (n = 160), and healthy controls (n = 330). Biotype classification, previously developed using cognitive and electrophysiological data and K-means clustering, was used to categorize psychosis probands into 3 Biotypes, with Biotype-1 (B-1) showing reduced neural salience and severe cognitive impairment. MAGeT-Brain segmentation was used to determine amygdala and hippocampal volumetric data and shape deformations.

RESULTS

When using Biotype classification, B-1 showed the strongest reductions in amygdala-hippocampal volume and the most widespread shape abnormalities. Using clinical diagnosis, probands with schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder showed the most significant reductions of amygdala and hippocampal volumes and the most abnormal hippocampal shape compared with healthy controls. Biotype classification provided the strongest neuroanatomical differences compared with conventional DSM diagnoses, with the best discrimination seen using bilateral amygdala and right hippocampal volumes in B-1.

CONCLUSION

These findings characterize amygdala and hippocampal volumetric and shape abnormalities across the psychosis spectrum. Grouping individuals by Biotype showed greater between-group discrimination, suggesting a promising approach and a favorable target for characterizing biological heterogeneity across the psychosis spectrum.

摘要

目的

基于大脑的精神病生物型是 B-SNIP 联盟开发的一部分,旨在为特发性精神病创造神经生物学上不同的亚组,与传统的现象学诊断方法无关。在目前的研究中,我们旨在通过比较传统的临床诊断与生物型分类来评估杏仁核和海马体的体积和形状差异来验证生物型模型。

方法

共有来自 6 个地点的 811 名参与者入选:精神分裂症患者(n = 199)、分裂情感障碍患者(n = 122)、伴有精神病的双相情感障碍患者(n = 160)和健康对照组(n = 330)。生物型分类是使用认知和电生理数据以及 K-均值聚类预先开发的,用于将精神病患者分为 3 种生物型,其中 B-1 型表现出降低的神经显著性和严重的认知障碍。使用 MAGeT-Brain 分割来确定杏仁核和海马体的体积数据和形状变形。

结果

使用生物型分类时,B-1 型显示出杏仁核-海马体体积降低最大和形状异常最广泛。使用临床诊断,与健康对照组相比,精神分裂症和分裂情感障碍患者的杏仁核和海马体体积下降最显著,海马体形状最异常。与传统的 DSM 诊断相比,生物型分类提供了最强的神经解剖差异,在 B-1 中使用双侧杏仁核和右侧海马体体积具有最佳的判别力。

结论

这些发现描述了精神病谱中杏仁核和海马体的体积和形状异常。通过生物型对个体进行分组显示出更大的组间差异,这表明这是一种很有前途的方法,也是一种很有前途的方法,可以用于描述精神病谱中的生物学异质性。