• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

代谢手术后糖尿病缓解预测评分的外部验证。

External validation of predictive scores for diabetes remission after metabolic surgery.

机构信息

2nd Department of General Surgery, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Jakubowskiego 2 st., 30-688, Kraków, Poland.

Department of General Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Ludwik Rydygier Memorial Hospital in Cracow, Kraków, Poland.

出版信息

Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2022 Feb;407(1):131-141. doi: 10.1007/s00423-021-02260-3. Epub 2021 Jul 13.

DOI:10.1007/s00423-021-02260-3
PMID:34255166
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8847237/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Bariatric surgery has proven to be the most efficient treatment for obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Despite detailed qualification, desirable outcome after an intervention is not achieved by every patient. Various risk prediction models of diabetes remission after metabolic surgery have been established to facilitate the decision-making process. The purpose of the study is to validate the performance of available risk prediction scores for diabetes remission a year after surgical treatment and to determine the optimal model.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis comprised 252 patients who underwent Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) or sleeve gastrectomy (SG) between 2009 and 2017 and completed 1-year follow-up. The literature review revealed 5 models, which were subsequently explored in our study. Each score relationship with diabetes remission was assessed using logistic regression. Discrimination was evaluated by area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve, whereas calibration by the Hosmer-Lemeshow test and predicted versus observed remission ratio.

RESULTS

One year after surgery, 68.7% partial and 21.8% complete diabetes remission and 53.4% excessive weight loss were observed. DiaBetter demonstrated the best predictive performance (AUROC 0.81; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.71-0.90; p-value > 0.05 in the Hosmer-Lemeshow test; predicted-to-observed ratio 1.09). The majority of models showed acceptable discrimination power. In calibration, only the DiaBetter score did not lose goodness-of-fit in all analyzed groups.

CONCLUSION

The DiaBetter score seems to be the most appropriate tool to predict diabetes remission after metabolic surgery since it presents adequate accuracy and is convenient to use in clinical practice. There are no accurate models to predict T2DM remission in a patient with advanced diabetes.

摘要

目的

减重手术已被证明是治疗肥胖症和 2 型糖尿病(T2DM)最有效的方法。尽管进行了详细的资格评估,但并非每个患者都能达到理想的干预效果。已经建立了各种代谢手术后糖尿病缓解的风险预测模型,以促进决策过程。本研究的目的是验证现有糖尿病缓解风险预测评分在手术后 1 年的性能,并确定最佳模型。

方法

回顾性分析了 2009 年至 2017 年间接受 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术(RYGB)或袖状胃切除术(SG)治疗并完成 1 年随访的 252 例患者。文献复习显示了 5 种模型,随后在我们的研究中进行了探讨。使用逻辑回归评估每个评分与糖尿病缓解的关系。通过接受者操作特征(ROC)曲线下面积(AUROC)评估区分度,通过 Hosmer-Lemeshow 检验和预测与观察缓解比评估校准度。

结果

术后 1 年,部分缓解 68.7%,完全缓解 21.8%,体重减轻过多 53.4%。DiaBetter 表现出最佳的预测性能(AUROC 0.81;95%置信区间 [CI] 0.71-0.90;Hosmer-Lemeshow 检验 p 值>0.05;预测与观察比值 1.09)。大多数模型的区分能力都可以接受。在校准方面,只有 DiaBetter 评分在所有分析组中都没有失去拟合优度。

结论

由于 DiaBetter 评分具有足够的准确性,并且在临床实践中使用方便,因此它似乎是预测代谢手术后糖尿病缓解的最恰当工具。对于患有晚期糖尿病的患者,目前还没有准确的模型可以预测 T2DM 的缓解。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6456/8847237/1bcbcd252f02/423_2021_2260_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6456/8847237/a8524fb4f241/423_2021_2260_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6456/8847237/1bcbcd252f02/423_2021_2260_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6456/8847237/a8524fb4f241/423_2021_2260_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6456/8847237/1bcbcd252f02/423_2021_2260_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
External validation of predictive scores for diabetes remission after metabolic surgery.代谢手术后糖尿病缓解预测评分的外部验证。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2022 Feb;407(1):131-141. doi: 10.1007/s00423-021-02260-3. Epub 2021 Jul 13.
2
Comparison of Four Risk Prediction Models for Diabetes Remission after Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Surgery in Obese Chinese Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.肥胖 2 型糖尿病患者 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路手术后糖尿病缓解的四种风险预测模型比较。
Obes Surg. 2020 Jun;30(6):2147-2157. doi: 10.1007/s11695-019-04371-9.
3
Validating Risk Prediction Models of Diabetes Remission After Sleeve Gastrectomy.验证袖状胃切除术后糖尿病缓解的风险预测模型。
Obes Surg. 2019 Jan;29(1):221-229. doi: 10.1007/s11695-018-3510-7.
4
Validation of Ad-DiaRem and ABCD Diabetes Remission Prediction Scores at 1-Year After Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass and Sleeve Gastrectomy in the Randomized Controlled Oseberg Trial.在随机对照的奥塞贝格试验中,对Roux-en-Y胃旁路术和袖状胃切除术后1年时Ad-DiaRem和ABCD糖尿病缓解预测评分的验证。
Obes Surg. 2022 Mar;32(3):801-809. doi: 10.1007/s11695-021-05856-2. Epub 2022 Jan 4.
5
Type 2 diabetes remission 2 years post Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy: the role of the weight loss and comparison of DiaRem and DiaBetter scores.胃旁路术和袖状胃切除术 2 年后 2 型糖尿病缓解:体重减轻的作用及 DiaRem 和 DiaBetter 评分的比较。
Diabet Med. 2018 Mar;35(3):360-367. doi: 10.1111/dme.13532. Epub 2017 Nov 21.
6
Type-2 diabetes mellitus remission prediction models after Roux-En-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy based on disease severity scores.基于疾病严重程度评分的 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术和袖状胃切除术治疗 2 型糖尿病缓解的预测模型。
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2024 Feb;208:111091. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2024.111091. Epub 2024 Jan 13.
7
Comparison of various prediction models in the effect of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy on type 2 diabetes mellitus in the Chinese population 5 years after surgery.腹腔镜袖状胃切除术对中国人群术后5年2型糖尿病影响的各种预测模型比较
Chin Med J (Engl). 2024 Feb 5;137(3):320-328. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000002718. Epub 2023 Jun 21.
8
Metabolic effects of bariatric surgery on patients with type 2 diabetes: a population-based study.减重手术对 2 型糖尿病患者代谢的影响:基于人群的研究。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2021 Jul;17(7):1349-1358. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2021.02.014. Epub 2021 Feb 18.
9
Review, Performance Comparison, and Validation of Models Predicting Type 2 Diabetes Remission After Bariatric Surgery in a Western European Population.在西欧人群中,对预测减重手术后 2 型糖尿病缓解的模型进行回顾、性能比较和验证。
Obes Surg. 2021 Apr;31(4):1549-1560. doi: 10.1007/s11695-020-05157-0. Epub 2021 Jan 4.
10
Efficacy of Different Procedures of Metabolic Surgery for Type 2 Diabetes in Asia: a Multinational and Multicenter Exploratory Study.代谢手术治疗亚洲 2 型糖尿病的不同术式疗效:一项多国家、多中心探索性研究。
Obes Surg. 2021 May;31(5):2153-2160. doi: 10.1007/s11695-021-05239-7. Epub 2021 Feb 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Towards precision medicine in bariatric surgery prescription.迈向肥胖症手术处方的精准医学。
Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2023 Oct;24(5):961-977. doi: 10.1007/s11154-023-09801-9. Epub 2023 May 2.
2
Accuracy of prediction models for long-term type 2 diabetes remission after gastric bypass.胃旁路术后长期 2 型糖尿病缓解预测模型的准确性。
Acta Diabetol. 2023 Aug;60(8):1019-1026. doi: 10.1007/s00592-023-02092-1. Epub 2023 Apr 21.
3
How Good is Stratification and Prediction Model Analysis Between Primary and Revisional Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Surgery? A Multi-center Study and Narrative Review.

本文引用的文献

1
A meta-analysis of the medium- and long-term effects of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.腹腔镜袖状胃切除术和腹腔镜Roux-en-Y胃旁路术的中长期效果的荟萃分析。
BMC Surg. 2020 Feb 12;20(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s12893-020-00695-x.
2
Comparison of Four Risk Prediction Models for Diabetes Remission after Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Surgery in Obese Chinese Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.肥胖 2 型糖尿病患者 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路手术后糖尿病缓解的四种风险预测模型比较。
Obes Surg. 2020 Jun;30(6):2147-2157. doi: 10.1007/s11695-019-04371-9.
3
Discordance in prediction for prognosis of type 2 diabetes after metabolic surgery: comparison of the ABCD, DiaRem, and individualized metabolic surgery models.
初次与再次 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路手术之间的分层和预测模型分析效果如何?一项多中心研究和叙述性综述。
Obes Surg. 2023 May;33(5):1431-1448. doi: 10.1007/s11695-023-06532-3. Epub 2023 Mar 11.
4
Effect of Banded Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Versus Sleeve Gastrectomy on Diabetes Remission at 5 Years Among Patients With Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes: A Blinded Randomized Clinical Trial.带襻 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术与袖状胃切除术对肥胖合并 2 型糖尿病患者糖尿病缓解的 5 年影响:一项盲法随机临床试验。
Diabetes Care. 2022 Jul 7;45(7):1503-1511. doi: 10.2337/dc21-2498.
代谢手术后2型糖尿病预后预测的不一致性:ABCD、DiaRem和个体化代谢手术模型的比较
Ann Surg Treat Res. 2019 Dec;97(6):309-318. doi: 10.4174/astr.2019.97.6.309. Epub 2019 Dec 2.
4
Prediction of Long-Term Diabetes Remission After RYGB, Sleeve Gastrectomy, and Adjustable Gastric Banding Using DiaRem and Advanced-DiaRem Scores.使用 DiaRem 和 Advanced-DiaRem 评分预测 RYGB、袖状胃切除术和可调胃束带术后长期糖尿病缓解情况。
Obes Surg. 2019 Mar;29(3):796-804. doi: 10.1007/s11695-018-3583-3.
5
Bariatric Surgery Worldwide: Baseline Demographic Description and One-Year Outcomes from the Fourth IFSO Global Registry Report 2018.《全球减重手术:2018 年 IFSO 第四次全球注册报告的基线人口统计学描述和一年结果》。
Obes Surg. 2019 Mar;29(3):782-795. doi: 10.1007/s11695-018-3593-1. Epub 2018 Nov 12.
6
Validating Risk Prediction Models of Diabetes Remission After Sleeve Gastrectomy.验证袖状胃切除术后糖尿病缓解的风险预测模型。
Obes Surg. 2019 Jan;29(1):221-229. doi: 10.1007/s11695-018-3510-7.
7
Predicting remission of diabetes post metabolic surgery: a comparison of ABCD, diarem, and DRS scores.预测代谢手术后糖尿病缓解:ABCD、diarem 和 DRS 评分的比较。
Obes Surg. 2018 Jul;28(7):2025-2031. doi: 10.1007/s11695-018-3136-9.
8
Metabolic surgery for the treatment of type 2 diabetes in obese individuals.代谢手术治疗肥胖个体 2 型糖尿病。
Diabetologia. 2018 Feb;61(2):257-264. doi: 10.1007/s00125-017-4513-y. Epub 2017 Dec 9.
9
Postoperative Care and Functional Recovery After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy vs. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Among Patients Under ERAS Protocol.在加速康复外科(ERAS)方案下,腹腔镜袖状胃切除术与腹腔镜Roux-en-Y胃旁路术后的护理及功能恢复情况对比
Obes Surg. 2018 Apr;28(4):1031-1039. doi: 10.1007/s11695-017-2964-3.
10
Type 2 diabetes remission 2 years post Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy: the role of the weight loss and comparison of DiaRem and DiaBetter scores.胃旁路术和袖状胃切除术 2 年后 2 型糖尿病缓解:体重减轻的作用及 DiaRem 和 DiaBetter 评分的比较。
Diabet Med. 2018 Mar;35(3):360-367. doi: 10.1111/dme.13532. Epub 2017 Nov 21.