Suppr超能文献

无栓子保护的颈动脉支架置入术增加主要不良事件:国家外科质量改进计划分析

Carotid Stenting without Embolic Protection Increases Major Adverse Events: Analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.

作者信息

Nazari P, Golnari P, Hurley M C, Shaibani A, Ansari S A, Potts M B, Jahromi B S

机构信息

From the Departments of Neurological Surgery and Radiology Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.

From the Departments of Neurological Surgery and Radiology Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois

出版信息

AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2021 Jul;42(7):1264-1269. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A7108. Epub 2021 Apr 1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Published data regarding embolic protection device efficacy is mixed, and its use during carotid artery stent placement remains variable. We, therefore, examined the frequency of embolic protection device use and its association with outcomes after carotid artery stent placement using a national quality improvement data base.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients undergoing carotid artery stent placement with or without embolic protection devices were identified in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data base. The primary outcome was the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (defined as death, stroke, or myocardial infarction/arrhythmia) within 30 days. Propensity scoring was used to create 2 matching cohorts of patients using demographic and baseline variables.

RESULTS

Between 2011 and 2018, among 1200 adult patients undergoing carotid artery stent placement, 23.8% did not have embolic protection devices. There was no trend toward increased embolic protection device use with time. Patients without embolic protection device use received preoperative antiplatelets less frequently (90.6% versus 94.6%, = .02), underwent more emergent carotid artery stent placement (7.2% versus 3.6%, = .01), and had a higher incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (OR = 1.81; 95% CI, 1.11-2.94) and stroke (OR = 3.31; 95% CI, 1.71-6.39). After compensating for baseline imbalances using propensity-matched cohorts ( = 261 for both), carotid artery stent placement without an embolic protection device remained associated with increased major adverse cardiovascular events (9.2% versus 4.2%; OR = 2.30; 95% CI, 1.10-4.80) and stroke (6.5% versus 1.5%; OR = 4.48; 95% CI, 1.49-13.49).

CONCLUSIONS

Lack of embolic protection device use during carotid artery stent placement is associated with a 4-fold increase in the likelihood of perioperative stroke. Nevertheless, nearly one-quarter of patients in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program underwent unprotected carotid artery stent placement. Efforts targeting improved embolic protection device use during carotid artery stent placement are warranted.

摘要

背景与目的

关于栓塞保护装置疗效的已发表数据不一,其在颈动脉支架置入术中的使用情况仍存在差异。因此,我们使用全国质量改进数据库,研究了栓塞保护装置的使用频率及其与颈动脉支架置入术后结局的关联。

材料与方法

在美国外科医师学会国家外科质量改进计划数据库中,识别接受或未接受栓塞保护装置的颈动脉支架置入患者。主要结局是30天内发生主要不良心血管事件(定义为死亡、卒中或心肌梗死/心律失常)的发生率。使用倾向评分法,根据人口统计学和基线变量创建两组匹配的患者队列。

结果

在2011年至2018年期间,1200例接受颈动脉支架置入的成年患者中,23.8%未使用栓塞保护装置。栓塞保护装置的使用没有随时间增加的趋势。未使用栓塞保护装置的患者术前接受抗血小板治疗的频率较低(90.6%对94.6%,P = 0.02),接受急诊颈动脉支架置入的比例更高(7.2%对3.6%,P = 0.01),主要不良心血管事件(OR = 1.81;95%CI,1.11 - 2.94)和卒中(OR = 3.31;95%CI,1.71 - 6.39)的发生率更高。使用倾向匹配队列(两组均为P = 261)校正基线不平衡后,未使用栓塞保护装置的颈动脉支架置入术仍与主要不良心血管事件增加相关(9.2%对4.2%;OR = 2.30;95%CI,1.10 - 4.80)和卒中(6.5%对1.5%;OR = 4.48;95%CI,1.49 - 13.49)。

结论

颈动脉支架置入术中未使用栓塞保护装置与围手术期卒中风险增加4倍相关。然而,在美国外科医师学会国家外科质量改进计划中,近四分之一的患者接受了未使用保护装置的颈动脉支架置入术。有必要致力于提高颈动脉支架置入术中栓塞保护装置的使用。

相似文献

3
Distal embolic protection use during transfemoral carotid artery stenting is associated with improved in-hospital outcomes.
J Vasc Surg. 2023 Jun;77(6):1710-1719.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2023.01.210. Epub 2023 Feb 14.
5
Carotid artery stenting: an update.
Curr Opin Cardiol. 2019 Nov;34(6):616-620. doi: 10.1097/HCO.0000000000000679.
6
Protected carotid stenting: clinical advantages and complications of embolic protection devices in 442 consecutive patients.
Stroke. 2003 Aug;34(8):1936-41. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000081000.23561.61. Epub 2003 Jul 3.
7
The Use of Embolic Protection Devices Is Associated With a Lower Stroke and Death Rate After Carotid Stenting.
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Jun 26;10(12):1257-1265. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.03.032.
8
Independent Modular Filter for Embolic Protection in Carotid Stenting.
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Mar;10(3). doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.116.004244.

引用本文的文献

2
Carotid artery stenting for symptomatic carotid near occlusions: Feasibility, safety and outcome analysis.
Interv Neuroradiol. 2024 Oct 21:15910199241292387. doi: 10.1177/15910199241292387.
3
CIRSE Standards of Practice on Carotid Artery Stenting.
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2024 Jun;47(6):705-716. doi: 10.1007/s00270-024-03707-y. Epub 2024 Apr 29.
4
Mid-Term Results of an Italian Multicentric Experience with the Roadsaver Dual-Layer Carotid Stent System.
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Jan 4;12(1):120. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12010120.
5
Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Radial or Femoral Access for Carotid Stenting.
Clin Neuroradiol. 2024 Mar;34(1):3-12. doi: 10.1007/s00062-023-01315-w. Epub 2023 Jul 4.
6
Lessons From ACST-2.
Stroke. 2022 Apr;53(4):e145-e149. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.121.037269. Epub 2022 Mar 1.

本文引用的文献

2
Influence of stent design and use of protection devices on outcome of carotid artery stenting: a pooled analysis of individual patient data.
J Neurointerv Surg. 2018 Dec;10(12):1149-1154. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2017-013622. Epub 2018 Apr 19.
3
Proximal embolic protection versus distal filter protection versus combined protection in carotid artery stenting: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2018 Jul;19(5 Pt A):545-552. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2017.12.010. Epub 2017 Dec 27.
4
Carotid Endarterectomy and Carotid Artery Stenting in the US Medicare Population, 1999-2014.
JAMA. 2017 Sep 19;318(11):1035-1046. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.12882.
5
The Use of Embolic Protection Devices Is Associated With a Lower Stroke and Death Rate After Carotid Stenting.
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Jun 26;10(12):1257-1265. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.03.032.
7
Regional variation in patient selection and treatment for carotid artery disease in the Vascular Quality Initiative.
J Vasc Surg. 2017 Jul;66(1):112-121. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.01.023. Epub 2017 Mar 27.
8
Randomized Trial of Stent versus Surgery for Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis.
N Engl J Med. 2016 Mar 17;374(11):1011-20. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1515706. Epub 2016 Feb 17.
9
10
Beta-blocker use is associated with lower stroke and death after carotid artery stenting.
J Vasc Surg. 2016 Feb;63(2):363-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2015.08.108. Epub 2015 Oct 30.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验