Hall Mark A, Studdert David M
Wake Forest University Schools of Law and Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC 27109-7206, USA.
Stanford University Schools of Law and Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
J Law Biosci. 2021 Jul 8;8(1):lsab016. doi: 10.1093/jlb/lsab016. eCollection 2021 Jan-Jun.
Discovery of effective vaccines and increased confidence that infection confers extended protection against coronavirus disease (COVID-19) have renewed discussion of using immunity certificates or 'passports' to selectively reduce ongoing public health restrictions.
To determine public views regarding government and private conferral of immunity privileges.
National on-line survey fielded in June 2020. Participants were randomly asked about either government 'passports' or private 'certificates' for COVID-19 immunity.
Adults from a standing panel maintained for academic research, selected to approximate national demographics.
MAIN OUTCOMES/MEASURES: Level of support/opposition to immunity privileges, and whether views vary based on: government vs. private adoption; demographics; political affiliation or views; or various COVID19-related attitudes and experiences.
Of 1315 respondents, 45.2% supported immunity privileges, with slightly more favoring private certificates than government passports (48.1% vs 42.6%, = 0.04). Support was greater for using passports or certificates to enable returns to high-risk jobs or attendance at large recreational events than for returning to work generally. Levels of support did not vary significantly according to age groups, socioeconomic or employment status, urbanicity, political affiliation or views, or whether the respondent had chronic disease(s). However, estimates from adjusted analyses showed less support among women (odds ratio, 0.64; 95% confidence interval, 0.51 to 0.80), and among Hispanics (0.56; 0.40 to 0.78) and other minorities (0.58; 0.40 to 0.85) compared with whites, but not among blacks (0.83; 0.60 to 1.15). Support was much higher among those who personally wanted a passport or certificate (75.6% vs 24.4%) and much lower among those who believed this would harm the social fabric of their community (22.9% vs 77.1%).
Public views are divided on both government or private uses of immunity certificates, but, prior to any efforts to politicize the issues, these views did not vary along usual political lines or by characteristics that indicate individual vulnerability to infection. Social consensus on the desirability of an immunity privileges programs may be difficult to achieve.
有效疫苗的发现以及人们越发相信感染能带来针对冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的长期保护,这重新引发了关于使用免疫证书或“通行证”来有选择地减少当前公共卫生限制措施的讨论。
确定公众对政府和私人授予免疫特权的看法。
2020年6月进行的全国在线调查。参与者被随机询问关于COVID-19免疫的政府“通行证”或私人“证书”。
来自一个为学术研究设立的常设小组的成年人,其选取旨在近似全国人口统计学特征。
主要结局/指标:对免疫特权的支持/反对程度,以及看法是否因以下因素而异:政府采用与私人采用;人口统计学特征;政治派别或观点;或各种与COVID-19相关的态度和经历。
在1315名受访者中,45.2%支持免疫特权,相比政府通行证,支持私人证书的比例略高(48.1%对42.6%,P = 0.04)。相比于普遍复工,人们更支持使用通行证或证书以便重返高风险工作岗位或参加大型娱乐活动。支持程度在不同年龄组、社会经济或就业状况、城市化程度、政治派别或观点,以及受访者是否患有慢性病方面没有显著差异。然而校正分析的估计结果显示,与白人相比,女性(优势比为0.64;95%置信区间为0.51至0.80)、西班牙裔(0.56;0.40至0.78)和其他少数族裔(0.58;0.40至0.85)的支持率较低,但黑人(0.83;0.60至1.15)并非如此。个人想要通行证或证书的人支持率要高得多(75.6%对24.4%),而认为这会损害社区社会结构的人支持率则低得多(22.9%对77.1%)。
公众对政府或私人使用免疫证书的看法存在分歧,但在任何将这些问题政治化的努力之前,这些看法并未按照通常的政治路线或表明个人易感染性的特征而有所不同。关于免疫特权计划是否可取达成社会共识可能会很困难。