Barello Serena, Paleologo Michele, Palamenghi Lorenzo, Acampora Marta, Graffigna Guendalina
Faculty of Psychology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, L.go Gemelli 1, 20123 Milan, Italy.
Department of Psychology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, L.go Gemelli 1, 20123 Milan, Italy.
Vaccines (Basel). 2022 Sep 8;10(9):1501. doi: 10.3390/vaccines10091501.
A cross-sectional survey between 29 January 2022 and 3 February 2022 was conducted to understand the public rationale for accepting or rejecting the use of COVID-19 immunity certificates and to identify the psychosocial factors that mostly predict the positive/negative individuals' perceptions of this measure. One thousand twenty-two Italian adults were recruited by a professional panel provider by employing a stratified sampling strategy controlled for gender, age, geographical area of residence, size of the urban centre of residence, employment, and wage. Eight Welch's ANOVAs were then carried out to compare the perception of benefits and the perception of harms among different population groups. Multiple linear regression was carried out to measure the explained variance of benefits perception and harms perception by age, trust in institutions, and concern for health emergencies. The results shows that age, trust in institution, and concern for the COVID-19 emergency explain more variance of perceived benefits than of perceived harms of COVID-19 immunity certificates but the opposite regarding political orientation which explains perceived harms better than perceived benefits. The need for policy improvements is pressing because a large share of the world's population remains unvaccinated. Moreover, our results can serve as vital information for similar health crises that may occur in the future. In addition, our results are expected to offer useful insights into public feelings around the use of digital health information tools.
2022年1月29日至2月3日进行了一项横断面调查,以了解公众接受或拒绝使用新冠免疫证书的理由,并确定最能预测个体对该措施的积极/消极看法的社会心理因素。一家专业的面板供应商采用分层抽样策略,根据性别、年龄、居住地理区域、居住城市中心规模、就业情况和工资水平,招募了1022名意大利成年人。然后进行了八次韦尔奇方差分析,以比较不同人群对益处的看法和对危害的看法。进行了多元线性回归,以衡量年龄、对机构的信任以及对健康紧急情况的担忧对益处感知和危害感知的解释方差。结果表明,年龄、对机构的信任以及对新冠紧急情况的担忧对新冠免疫证书感知益处的解释方差大于对感知危害的解释方差,但政治倾向则相反,其对感知危害的解释优于对感知益处的解释。由于世界上很大一部分人口仍未接种疫苗,政策改进的需求迫在眉睫。此外,我们的结果可为未来可能发生的类似健康危机提供重要信息。此外,我们的结果有望为公众对数字健康信息工具使用的感受提供有用的见解。