• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

派遣公民对院外心脏骤停者进行急救的身体伤害风险。

Risk of Physical Injury for Dispatched Citizen Responders to Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest.

机构信息

Copenhagen Emergency Medical Services Copenhagen University Hospital Copenhagen Denmark.

Department of Clinical Medicine University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark.

出版信息

J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Jul 20;10(14):e021626. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.021626. Epub 2021 Jul 14.

DOI:10.1161/JAHA.121.021626
PMID:34259016
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8483463/
Abstract

Background Citizen responder programs are implemented worldwide to dispatch volunteer citizens to participate in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitation. However, the risk of injuries in relation to activation is largely unknown. We aimed to assess the risk of physical injury for dispatched citizen responders. Methods and Results Since September 2017, citizen responders have been activated through a smartphone application when located close to a suspected cardiac arrest in the Capital Region of Denmark. A survey was sent to all activated citizen responders, including a specific question about risk of acquiring an injury during activation. We included all surveys from September 1, 2017, to May 15, 2020. From May 15, 2019, to May 15, 2020, we followed up on all survey nonresponders by phone call, e-mail, or text messages to examine if nonresponders were at higher risk of severe or fatal injuries. In 1665 suspected out-of-hospital cardiac arrests, 9574 citizen responders were dispatched and 76.6% (7334) answered the question regarding physical injury. No injury was reported by 99.3% (7281) of the responders. Being at risk of physical injury was reported by 0.3% (24), whereas 0.4% (26) reported an injury (25 minor injuries and 1 severe injury [ankle fracture]). When following up on nonresponders (2472), we reached 99.1% (2449). No one reported acquired injuries, and only 1 reported being at risk of injury. Conclusions We found low risk of physical injury reported by volunteer citizen responders dispatched to out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Risk of injury should be considered and monitored as a safety measure in citizen responder programs.

摘要

背景 公民响应者计划在全球范围内实施,以派遣志愿者参与院外心脏骤停复苏。然而,与激活相关的受伤风险在很大程度上尚不清楚。我们旨在评估派遣公民响应者受伤的风险。

方法和结果 自 2017 年 9 月以来,公民响应者通过智能手机应用程序在丹麦首都地区附近发现疑似心脏骤停时被激活。向所有激活的公民响应者发送了一份调查,其中包括一个关于在激活期间受伤风险的具体问题。我们包括了 2017 年 9 月 1 日至 2020 年 5 月 15 日的所有调查。从 2019 年 5 月 15 日至 2020 年 5 月 15 日,我们通过电话、电子邮件或短信对所有调查未回复者进行了随访,以检查未回复者是否有更高的严重或致命伤害风险。在 1665 例疑似院外心脏骤停中,派遣了 9574 名公民响应者,其中 76.6%(7334 人)回答了关于身体伤害的问题。99.3%(7281 人)的响应者未报告受伤。有 0.3%(24 人)报告有身体受伤的风险,0.4%(26 人)报告受伤(25 例轻伤和 1 例严重伤[踝关节骨折])。在对未回复者(2472 人)进行随访时,我们联系到了 99.1%(2449 人)。没有人报告受伤,只有 1 人报告有受伤风险。

结论 我们发现,被派往院外心脏骤停的志愿公民响应者报告的身体伤害风险较低。在公民响应者计划中,应考虑并监测受伤风险作为一项安全措施。

相似文献

1
Risk of Physical Injury for Dispatched Citizen Responders to Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest.派遣公民对院外心脏骤停者进行急救的身体伤害风险。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Jul 20;10(14):e021626. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.021626. Epub 2021 Jul 14.
2
Smartphone Activation of Citizen Responders to Facilitate Defibrillation in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest.智能手机激活公民响应者,以促进院外心脏骤停时的除颤。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 Jul 7;76(1):43-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.04.073.
3
Activation of Citizen Responders to Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest During the COVID-19 Outbreak in Denmark 2020.丹麦 2020 年 COVID-19 疫情期间对院外心脏骤停的公民响应者的激活
J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 Mar 15;11(6):e024140. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.024140. Epub 2022 Mar 5.
4
Collaboration between emergency physicians and citizen responders in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitation.急诊医师与公民响应者在院外心脏骤停复苏中的合作。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2021 Aug 3;29(1):110. doi: 10.1186/s13049-021-00927-w.
5
Citizen Responder Activation in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest by Time of Day and Day of Week.根据一天中的时间和一周中的天数,院外心脏骤停时的公民响应者激活情况。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 Feb;11(3):e023413. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.023413. Epub 2022 Jan 21.
6
Immediate psychological impact on citizen responders dispatched through a mobile application to out-of-hospital cardiac arrests.通过移动应用程序派遣至院外心脏骤停现场的民众急救人员的即时心理影响。
Resusc Plus. 2021 Aug 13;7:100155. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2021.100155. eCollection 2021 Sep.
7
A smartphone application for dispatch of lay responders to out-of-hospital cardiac arrests.一款用于派遣非专业急救人员对院外心脏骤停进行急救的智能手机应用。
Resuscitation. 2018 May;126:160-165. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2018.01.039. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
8
Wellbeing, emotional response and stress among lay responders dispatched to suspected out-of-hospital cardiac arrests.被派往疑似院外心脏骤停现场的非专业急救人员的健康、情绪反应和压力
Resuscitation. 2022 Jan;170:352-360. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.11.005. Epub 2021 Nov 10.
9
Local lay rescuers with AEDs, alerted by text messages, contribute to early defibrillation in a Dutch out-of-hospital cardiac arrest dispatch system.在荷兰的院外心脏骤停调度系统中,通过短信提醒配备自动体外除颤器(AED)的当地非专业救援人员有助于早期除颤。
Resuscitation. 2014 Nov;85(11):1444-9. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2014.07.020. Epub 2014 Aug 15.
10
Volunteer responder provision of support to relatives of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients: a qualitative study.志愿者为院外心脏骤停患者家属提供支持:一项定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2023 Mar 21;13(3):e071220. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-071220.

引用本文的文献

1
Defining the terminology of first responders alerted for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest by medical dispatch centres: An international consensus study on nomenclature.界定医疗调度中心为院外心脏骤停发出警报的急救人员术语:一项关于命名的国际共识研究
Resusc Plus. 2025 Feb 20;22:100912. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2025.100912. eCollection 2025 Mar.
2
Key Features in Designing an Integrated Recall System for Dispatch in Mass Casualty Incidents; a Systematic Review.为大规模伤亡事件调度设计综合召回系统的关键特征;系统综述
Arch Acad Emerg Med. 2024 Jul 21;12(1):e58. doi: 10.22037/aaem.v12i1.2330. eCollection 2024.
3
Volunteer Responder Interventions in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest in Urban, Suburban, and Rural Areas.

本文引用的文献

1
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines 2021: Systems saving lives.《2021年欧洲复苏委员会指南:拯救生命的系统》
Resuscitation. 2021 Apr;161:80-97. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.02.008. Epub 2021 Mar 24.
2
Crowdsourcing to save lives: A scoping review of bystander alert technologies for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.众包拯救生命:院外心脏骤停旁观者警报技术的范围综述
Resuscitation. 2021 Jan;158:94-121. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2020.10.035. Epub 2020 Nov 11.
3
Education, Implementation, and Teams: 2020 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations.
城市、郊区和农村地区院外心脏骤停的志愿者急救人员干预措施。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Feb 20;13(4):e032629. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.032629. Epub 2024 Feb 13.
教育、实施与团队:2020 国际心肺复苏与紧急心血管救治科学共识及治疗推荐
Circulation. 2020 Oct 20;142(16_suppl_1):S222-S283. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000896. Epub 2020 Oct 21.
4
Smartphone Activation of Citizen Responders to Facilitate Defibrillation in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest.智能手机激活公民响应者,以促进院外心脏骤停时的除颤。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 Jul 7;76(1):43-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.04.073.
5
Enhancing citizens response to out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A systematic review of mobile-phone systems to alert citizens as first responders.增强市民对院外心脏骤停的反应:对作为第一响应者提醒市民的移动电话系统的系统评价。
Resuscitation. 2020 Jul;152:16-25. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2020.05.006. Epub 2020 May 11.
6
Can you get there from here? An analysis of walkability among PulsePoint CPR alert dispatches.你能从这里到达那里吗?对PulsePoint心肺复苏警报调度中的可步行性分析。
Resuscitation. 2020 Mar 1;148:135-139. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2019.12.038. Epub 2020 Jan 18.
7
Walking Route-Based Calculation is Recommended for Optimizing Deployment of Publicly Accessible Defibrillators in Urban Cities.推荐基于步行路径的计算方法来优化城市公共除颤器的部署。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Jan 21;9(2):e014398. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.014398. Epub 2020 Jan 11.
8
Mobile phone-based alerting of CPR-trained volunteers simultaneously with the ambulance can reduce the resuscitation-free interval and improve outcome after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A German, population-based cohort study.基于手机的 CPR 受训志愿者与救护车同时警报,可以缩短复苏间期并改善院外心脏骤停后的结局:一项德国基于人群的队列研究。
Resuscitation. 2020 Feb 1;147:57-64. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2019.12.012. Epub 2019 Dec 27.
9
First-response treatment after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a survey of current practices across 29 countries in Europe.院外心脏骤停后的急救治疗:对欧洲 29 个国家当前实践情况的调查。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2019 Dec 16;27(1):112. doi: 10.1186/s13049-019-0689-0.
10
Underutilisation of public access defibrillation is related to retrieval distance and time-dependent availability.公共接入除颤器的未充分利用与检索距离和时间相关的可用性有关。
Heart. 2018 Aug;104(16):1339-1343. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2018-312998. Epub 2018 May 14.