Davis Esa M, Abebe Kaleab Z, Simhan Hyagriv N, Catalano Patrick, Costacou Tina, Comer Diane, Orris Steven, Ly Kathleen, Decker Alison, Mendez Dara, Day Nancy, Scifres Christina M
Department of Medicine, the Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Science, the Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, and the Department of Epidemiology, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tufts University, Boston, Massachusetts; and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indianapolis.
Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Jul 1;138(1):6-15. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004431.
To evaluate differences in short-term perinatal outcomes between the two prominent screening strategies for gestational diabetes mellitus, the International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) and Carpenter-Coustan.
In this single-site, blinded, randomized, comparative effectiveness trial, participants received a nonfasting 50-g oral glucose tolerance test and, if less than 200 mg/dL (less than 11.1 mmol/L), were randomized to further screening with either IADPSG or Carpenter-Coustan criteria. Gestational diabetes treatment occurred per routine clinical care. The primary outcome was incidence of large-for-gestational-age (LGA) neonates. Prespecified secondary outcomes included small-for-gestational-age (SGA) neonates, cesarean birth, and neonatal and maternal composites of adverse perinatal outcomes. Assuming a 15% incidence of LGA neonates in the Carpenter-Coustan group, 782 participants provided more than 80% power to detect a 7% absolute risk reduction with the use of IADPSG; planned recruitment was 920 for anticipated attrition.
From June 2015 to February 2019, 1,016 participants were enrolled and 921 were randomized to IADPSG (n=461) or Carpenter-Coustan (n=460) groups. Gestational diabetes incidence (14.4% vs 4.5%, P<.001) and diabetes medication use (9.3% vs 2.4%; P<.001) were more common in the IADPSG group; there were no differences in LGA neonates, either overall (risk reduction 0.90, 97.5% CI 0.53-1.52) or among women without gestational diabetes (risk reduction 0.85, 97.5% CI 0.49-1.48). Those screened with IADPSG had higher rates of neonatal morbidity but fewer study-related adverse events. Rates of SGA neonates, cesarean birth, and maternal morbidity composite did not differ significantly between study groups.
The IADPSG screening criteria resulted in more women diagnosed and treated for gestational diabetes than Carpenter-Coustan without reducing the incidence of LGA birth weight or maternal or neonatal morbidity.
ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02309138.
评估国际糖尿病与妊娠研究组(IADPSG)和卡彭特-库斯坦这两种主要的妊娠期糖尿病筛查策略在短期围产期结局方面的差异。
在这项单中心、盲法、随机、比较有效性试验中,参与者接受非空腹50克口服葡萄糖耐量试验,如果血糖低于200毫克/分升(低于11.1毫摩尔/升),则随机分组,根据IADPSG或卡彭特-库斯坦标准进行进一步筛查。妊娠期糖尿病的治疗按照常规临床护理进行。主要结局是大于胎龄(LGA)新生儿的发生率。预先设定的次要结局包括小于胎龄(SGA)新生儿、剖宫产以及围产期不良结局的新生儿和母亲综合指标。假设卡彭特-库斯坦组中LGA新生儿的发生率为15%,782名参与者有超过80%的把握度检测出使用IADPSG可使绝对风险降低7%;计划招募920名参与者以应对预期的失访情况。
2015年6月至2019年2月,共纳入1016名参与者,921名被随机分为IADPSG组(n = 461)或卡彭特-库斯坦组(n = 460)。IADPSG组的妊娠期糖尿病发生率(14.4%对4.5%,P <. = 0.53 - 1.52)或无妊娠期糖尿病的女性中(风险降低0.85,97.5%可信区间0.49 - 1.48)均无差异。接受IADPSG筛查的新生儿发病率较高,但与研究相关的不良事件较少。小于胎龄新生儿、剖宫产以及母亲发病率综合指标在研究组之间无显著差异。
IADPSG筛查标准诊断和治疗的妊娠期糖尿病女性比卡彭特-库斯坦标准更多,但并未降低大于胎龄出生体重或母婴发病率。
ClinicalTrials.gov,NCT02309138。