Salas Eduardo, Farm Maria, Pich Sara, Onelöv Liselotte, Guillen Kevin, Ortega Israel, Antovic Jovan P, Soria Jose Manuel
Scientific Department, Gendiag, c/ Lepant, 141-4-1, 08013 Barcelona, Spain.
Institute for Molecular Medicine and Surgery and Department of Clinical Chemistry, Karolinska Institutet and Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
TH Open. 2021 Jul 8;5(3):e303-e311. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1729626. eCollection 2021 Jul.
Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a complex, multifactorial problem, the development of which depends on a combination of genetic and acqfiguired risk factors. In a Spanish population, the Thrombo inCode score (or TiC score), which combines clinical and genetic risk components, was recently proven better at determining the risk of VTE than the commonly used model involving the analysis of two genetic variants associated with thrombophilia: the Factor V Leiden (F5 rs6025) and the G20210A prothrombin (F2 rs1799963). The aim of the present case-control study was to validate the VTE risk predictive capacity of the TiC score in a Northern European population (from Sweden). The study included 173 subjects with VTE and 196 controls. All were analyzed for the genetic risk variants included in the TiC gene panel. Standard measures -receiver operating characteristic (ROC) area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, and odds ratio (OR)-were calculated. The TiC score returned an AUC value of 0.673, a sensitivity of 72.25%, a specificity of 60.62%, and an OR of 4.11. These AUC, sensitivity, and OR values are all greater than those associated with the currently used combination of genetic variants. A TiC version adjusted for the allelic frequencies of the Swedish population significantly improved its AUC value (0.783). In summary, the TiC score returned more reliable risk estimates for the studied Northern European population than did the analysis of the Factor V Leiden and the G20210A genetic variations in combination. Thus, the TiC score can be reliably used with European populations, despite differences in allelic frequencies.
静脉血栓栓塞症(VTE)是一个复杂的多因素问题,其发生取决于遗传和后天风险因素的综合作用。在西班牙人群中,结合临床和遗传风险因素的血栓形成编码评分(Thrombo inCode score,TiC评分)最近被证明在确定VTE风险方面比常用的涉及分析两种与血栓形成倾向相关的基因变异的模型更有效:凝血因子V莱顿突变(F5 rs6025)和凝血酶原G20210A突变(F2 rs1799963)。本病例对照研究的目的是在北欧人群(来自瑞典)中验证TiC评分对VTE风险的预测能力。该研究纳入了173例VTE患者和196例对照。对所有受试者进行了TiC基因检测板中包含的遗传风险变异分析。计算了标准指标——受试者操作特征曲线(ROC)下的面积(AUC)、敏感性、特异性和比值比(OR)。TiC评分的AUC值为0.673,敏感性为72.25%,特异性为60.62%,OR为4.11。这些AUC、敏感性和OR值均高于目前使用的基因变异组合相关的值。根据瑞典人群的等位基因频率调整后的TiC版本显著提高了其AUC值(0.783)。总之,对于所研究的北欧人群,TiC评分比凝血因子V莱顿突变和凝血酶原G20210A基因变异联合分析返回的风险估计更可靠。因此,尽管等位基因频率存在差异,TiC评分仍可在欧洲人群中可靠使用。