Faculty of Education, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
Brain and Mind Institute, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
Hum Brain Mapp. 2021 Oct 1;42(14):4722-4739. doi: 10.1002/hbm.25580. Epub 2021 Jul 16.
Improvements in behavior are known to be accompanied by both structural and functional changes in the brain. However, whether those changes lead to more general improvements, beyond the behavior being trained, remains a contentious issue. We investigated whether training on one of two cognitive tasks would lead to either near transfer (that is, improvements on a quantifiably similar task) or far transfer (that is, improvements on a quantifiably different task), and furthermore, if such changes did occur, what the underlying neural mechanisms might be. Healthy adults (n = 16, 15 females) trained on either a verbal inhibitory control task or a visuospatial working memory task for 4 weeks, over the course of which they received five diffusion tensor imaging scans. Two additional tasks served as measures of near and far transfer. Behaviorally, participants improved on the task that they trained on, but did not improve on cognitively similar tests (near transfer), nor cognitively dissimilar tests (far transfer). Extensive changes to white matter microstructure were observed, with verbal inhibitory control training leading to changes in a left-lateralized network of frontotemporal and occipitofrontal tracts, and visuospatial working memory training leading to changes in right-lateralized frontoparietal tracts. Very little overlap was observed in changes between the two training groups. On the basis of these results, we suggest that near and far transfer were not observed because the changes in white matter tracts associated with training on each task are almost entirely nonoverlapping with, and therefore afford no advantages for, the untrained tasks.
行为的改善已知伴随着大脑的结构和功能变化。然而,这些变化是否会导致除了所训练的行为之外的更普遍的改善,仍然是一个有争议的问题。我们调查了在两项认知任务中的一项上进行训练是否会导致近迁移(即,在可量化相似任务上的改善)或远迁移(即,在可量化不同任务上的改善),并且,如果确实发生了这种变化,潜在的神经机制可能是什么。健康成年人(n=16,15 名女性)接受了为期 4 周的言语抑制控制任务或视空间工作记忆任务的训练,在此期间他们接受了五次弥散张量成像扫描。另外两项任务作为近迁移和远迁移的衡量标准。行为上,参与者在他们接受训练的任务上有所提高,但在认知上相似的测试(近迁移)上没有提高,也没有在认知上不同的测试(远迁移)上提高。观察到大量的白质微观结构变化,言语抑制控制训练导致额颞叶和枕额叶的左偏侧网络的变化,而视空间工作记忆训练导致右侧额顶叶束的变化。在两个训练组之间观察到的变化几乎没有重叠。基于这些结果,我们认为没有观察到近迁移和远迁移,是因为与每个任务的训练相关的白质束的变化几乎完全不重叠,并且因此对未训练的任务没有优势。