Tanprasertsuk Jirayu, Perry LeeAnn M, Tate Devon E, Honaker Ryan W, Shmalberg Justin
NomNomNow, Inc., Nashville, TN 37207, USA.
Department of Comparative, Diagnostic, and Population Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA.
Transl Anim Sci. 2021 May 27;5(3):txab071. doi: 10.1093/tas/txab071. eCollection 2021 Jul.
Commercial fresh cooked foods have started gaining popularity among American dog owners in recent years. However, nutrient digestibility and the estimation of metabolizable energy (ME) of commercial fresh dog foods remain inadequately understood, even though both measures are critical to provide the intended calories for the target animal. In this preliminary study, different cohorts of normal-weight dogs were fed one of five test diets of comparable macronutrient composition: a chicken-based extruded dry kibble diet ( = 12), and chicken- ( = 12), beef- ( = 6), pork- ( = 6), or turkey-based fresh food ( = 6) for 10 d. Daily food intake and fecal characteristics were recorded, and fecal samples were collected for nutrient analysis. Despite comparable dry matter (DM) and caloric intakes between the two chicken-based diets, the fresh diet led to lower defecation frequency (1.2 ± 0.2 vs. 1.7 ± 0.5 times/d, adjusted < 0.001), lower fecal DM (24 ± 8 vs. 47 ± 10 g/d, adjusted < 0.001), and lower fecal calories (92 ± 31 vs. 189 ± 43 kcal/d, adjusted < 0.001) than the kibble diet. The apparent total tract digestibility of DM, protein, fat, nitrogen-free extract, and calories of the kibble diet were all significantly lower than any of the fresh diets (adjusted < 0.001 for all). Measured ME per food DM in all of the fresh diets, except the pork-based recipe, was significantly higher than that of the kibble diet (adjusted < 0.001 for all). For the kibble diet, the modified Atwater calculation underestimated the ME and the NRC 2006 calculation was the most accurate predictor of ME. The standard Atwater calculation performed best for the two fresh diets that had the highest fat content (chicken, beef) and the NRC 2006 calculation performed best for the fresh diet that had the highest protein content (pork). ME of the turkey-based diet was equally overestimated and underestimated with the standard Atwater and NRC 2006 methods, respectively. We propose that commercial and home-prepared fresh diets should be assessed using standard Atwater factors as commonly done in human nutrition, or preferably for commercial products, by direct measurement in conforming feeding trials.
近年来,商业新鲜烹制的食品开始在美国养狗人士中受到欢迎。然而,尽管营养消化率和商业新鲜狗粮的可代谢能量(ME)估算对于为目标动物提供预期热量至关重要,但人们对它们的了解仍然不足。在这项初步研究中,将不同组的正常体重犬分别喂食五种宏量营养素组成相近的试验日粮之一:一种以鸡肉为基础的挤压干粮日粮( = 12),以及以鸡肉( = 12)、牛肉( = 6)、猪肉( = 6)或火鸡肉为基础的新鲜食品( = 6),为期10天。记录每日食物摄入量和粪便特征,并收集粪便样本进行营养分析。尽管两种以鸡肉为基础的日粮之间的干物质(DM)和热量摄入量相当,但新鲜日粮导致的排便频率更低(1.2±0.2次/天对1.7±0.5次/天,校正后 < 0.001),粪便DM更低(24±8克/天对47±10克/天,校正后 < 0.001),且粪便热量更低(92±31千卡/天对189±43千卡/天,校正后 < 0.001)。干粮日粮的DM、蛋白质、脂肪、无氮浸出物和热量的表观全肠道消化率均显著低于任何一种新鲜日粮(所有校正后 < 0.001)。除了以猪肉为基础的配方外,所有新鲜日粮中每食物DM测得的ME均显著高于干粮日粮(所有校正后 < 0.001)。对于干粮日粮,改良的阿特沃特计算法低估了ME,而NRC 2006计算法是ME的最准确预测指标。标准阿特沃特计算法对脂肪含量最高的两种新鲜日粮(鸡肉、牛肉)效果最佳,而NRC 2006计算法对蛋白质含量最高的新鲜日粮(猪肉)效果最佳。火鸡日粮的ME分别用标准阿特沃特法和NRC 2006法高估和低估得同样多。我们建议,应像人类营养中通常所做的那样,使用标准阿特沃特系数来评估商业和家庭自制的新鲜日粮,或者对于商业产品,最好通过符合要求的饲养试验进行直接测量。