Roberts Leah J, Oba Patricia M, Utterback Pamela L, Parsons Carl M, Swanson Kelly S
Department of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801.
Division of Nutritional Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801.
Transl Anim Sci. 2023 Feb 15;7(1):txad020. doi: 10.1093/tas/txad020. eCollection 2023 Jan.
The pet food market is constantly changing and adapting to meet the needs and desires of pets and their owners. One trend that has been growing in popularity lately is the feeding of fresh, human-grade foods. Human-grade pet foods contain ingredients that have all been stored, handled, processed, and transported in a manner that complies with regulations set for human food production. While most human-grade pet foods are based on animal-derived ingredients, vegan options also exist. To our knowledge, no in vivo studies have been conducted to analyze the performance of human-grade vegan diets. Therefore, the objective of this study was to investigate the amino acid (AA) digestibility and nitrogen-corrected true metabolizable energy (TME ) of mildly cooked human-grade vegan dog foods using precision-fed cecectomized rooster and conventional rooster assays. Three commercial dog foods were tested. Two were mildly cooked human-grade vegan dog diets (Bramble Cowbell diet (BC); Bramble roost diet (BR)), while the third was a chicken-based extruded dog diet (chicken and brown rice recipe diet (CT)). Prior to the rooster assays, both mildly cooked diets were lyophilized, and then all three diets were ground. Diets were fed to cecectomized roosters to determine AA digestibility, while conventional roosters were used to determine TME . All data were analyzed using the mixed models procedure of SAS (version 9.4). The majority of indispensable and dispensable AA across all diets had digestibilities higher than 80%, with a few exceptions (BC: histidine, lysine, threonine, and valine; BR: histidine). The only difference in indispensable AA digestibility among diets was observed with tryptophan, with its digestibility being higher ( = 0.0163) in CT than in BC. TME values were higher ( = 0.006) in BC and BR (4.55 and 4.66 kcal/g dry matter, respectively) than that in CT (3.99 kcal/g dry matter). The TME /GE was also higher ( = 0.0193) in BR than in CT. Metabolizable energy (ME) estimates using Atwater factors accurately estimated the energy content of CT, but modified Atwater factors and the predictive equations for ME recommended by the National Research Council underestimated energy content. All calculations underestimated the measured TME values of BC and BR, with Atwater factors being the closest. Although testing in dogs is required, these data suggest that mildly cooked human-grade vegan dog diets are well-digested. Moreover, TME data suggest that existing methods and equations underestimate the ME of the mildly cooked human-grade vegan foods tested.
宠物食品市场一直在不断变化和调整,以满足宠物及其主人的需求和期望。最近越来越受欢迎的一个趋势是喂食新鲜的、符合人类食用标准的食物。符合人类食用标准的宠物食品所含成分在储存、处理、加工和运输过程中均符合人类食品生产规定。虽然大多数符合人类食用标准的宠物食品以动物源性成分为基础,但也有纯素选择。据我们所知,尚未进行体内研究来分析符合人类食用标准的纯素饮食的性能。因此,本研究的目的是使用精确饲喂的切除盲肠公鸡和传统公鸡试验,研究轻度烹饪的符合人类食用标准的纯素狗粮的氨基酸(AA)消化率和氮校正真代谢能(TME)。测试了三种商业狗粮。两种是轻度烹饪的符合人类食用标准的纯素狗粮(荆棘牛铃饮食(BC);荆棘栖木饮食(BR)),而第三种是基于鸡肉的挤压狗粮(鸡肉和糙米配方饮食(CT))。在进行公鸡试验之前,将两种轻度烹饪的饮食进行冻干,然后将所有三种饮食磨碎。将饮食喂给切除盲肠的公鸡以确定AA消化率,而使用传统公鸡来确定TME。所有数据均使用SAS(版本9.4)的混合模型程序进行分析。所有饮食中大多数必需和非必需氨基酸的消化率高于80%,有少数例外(BC:组氨酸、赖氨酸、苏氨酸和缬氨酸;BR:组氨酸)。饮食之间必需氨基酸消化率的唯一差异出现在色氨酸上,其在CT中的消化率高于BC(P = 0.0163)。BC和BR的TME值较高(P = 0.006)(分别为4.55和4.66千卡/克干物质),高于CT(3.99千卡/克干物质)。BR的TME/GE也高于CT(P = 0.0193)。使用阿特沃特因子估算的代谢能(ME)准确估算了CT的能量含量,但修正的阿特沃特因子和美国国家研究委员会推荐的ME预测方程低估了能量含量。所有计算均低估了BC和BR的实测TME值,阿特沃特因子最接近。尽管需要在狗身上进行测试,但这些数据表明轻度烹饪的符合人类食用标准的纯素狗粮消化良好。此外,TME数据表明,现有方法和方程低估了所测试的轻度烹饪的符合人类食用标准的纯素食品的ME。