Suppr超能文献

政治倾向与 COVID-19 重症风险成年人的冒险行为。

Political affiliation and risk taking behaviors among adults with elevated chance of severe complications from COVID-19.

机构信息

Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, United States of America; Gerald R. Ford School of Public Policy, University of Michigan, United States of America; Department of Economics, University of Michigan, United States of America.

Department of Public Administration and International Affairs, Syracuse University, United States of America; Center for Aging and Policy Studies, Aging Studies Institute, Syracuse University, United States of America.

出版信息

Prev Med. 2021 Dec;153:106726. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106726. Epub 2021 Jul 16.

Abstract

This study determines whether COVID-related risk-taking behavior was different among Republicans, Democrats, and Independents, in adults with elevated chance of severe complications from COVID-19. Using US national survey data collected September 30-October 27, 2020 (N = 6095), behaviors in the prior week examined were: 7 potentially risky activities, mask wearing anywhere, and mask wearing while undertaking each activity. Differences among political affiliations were estimated for adults with 0 and with ≥1 medical risk factors for severe complications, adjusting for sociodemographic factors. Among adults with medical risk factors, the adjusted number of potentially risky activities was higher among Republicans (3.83) but not Independents (3.17) relative to Democrats (2.98). The adjusted percentage of adults with medical risk factors who wore a mask anywhere in the past week was lower for Republicans (87%) and Independents (91%) than for Democrats (97%). While undertaking each specific activity, the adjusted percentage of at-risk adults never wearing a mask was higher for Republicans than Democrats: 24% vs 8% at bar/club; 6% vs 0% at grocery/pharmacy; 63% vs 30% visiting at friend's home; 68% vs 41% hosting visitors; 30% vs 5% at gathering of ≥10 people; 25% vs 11% while within 6 ft of someone they do not live with. Rates of mask wearing among political Independents were between rates among Democrats and Republicans. Efforts to reduce COVID-related risky behavior should recognize that although Republicans take more risks, rates of mask wearing at common activities are low across political affiliations, even for populations vulnerable to severe complications.

摘要

本研究旨在确定在 COVID-19 重症风险较高的成年人中,共和党人、民主党人和独立派在与 COVID 相关的冒险行为上是否存在差异。该研究使用了 2020 年 9 月 30 日至 10 月 27 日收集的美国全国调查数据(N=6095),调查了前一周的以下行为:7 种潜在危险活动、在任何地方戴口罩以及在进行每项活动时戴口罩。对于有 0 个和≥1 个严重并发症医疗风险因素的成年人,根据社会人口因素调整了政治派别之间的差异。在有医疗风险因素的成年人中,共和党(3.83)而非独立派(3.17)比民主党(2.98)进行更多潜在危险活动的比例更高。在过去一周内,有医疗风险因素的成年人在任何地方戴口罩的比例,共和党(87%)和独立派(91%)均低于民主党(97%)。在从事每项具体活动时,从未戴口罩的高危成年人比例,共和党人比民主党人更高:酒吧/俱乐部为 24%比 8%;杂货店/药房为 6%比 0%;拜访朋友家为 63%比 30%;接待访客为 68%比 41%;10 人以上聚会为 30%比 5%;与不与自己同住的人距离在 6 英尺以内为 25%比 11%。独立派的口罩佩戴率介于民主党人和共和党人之间。减少与 COVID 相关的冒险行为的努力应认识到,尽管共和党人承担的风险更多,但在各个政治派别中,常见活动中的口罩佩戴率都很低,即使是对于易患重症的人群也是如此。

相似文献

5
Political affiliation moderates subjective interpretations of COVID-19 graphs.政治派别会缓和对新冠疫情图表的主观解读。
Big Data Soc. 2022 Mar 4;9(1):20539517221080678. doi: 10.1177/20539517221080678. eCollection 2022 Jan.

本文引用的文献

9
Political party affiliation, political ideology and mortality.政党归属、政治意识形态与死亡率。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2015 May;69(5):423-31. doi: 10.1136/jech-2014-204803. Epub 2015 Jan 28.
10
Are Republicans healthier than Democrats?共和党人比民主党人更健康吗?
Int J Epidemiol. 2010 Jun;39(3):930-1. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyp152. Epub 2009 Mar 5.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验