Suppr超能文献

学术-实践团队方法对护士和公共卫生专业人员研究能力建设的有效性。

Effectiveness of an Academic-Practice Team Approach on Research Capacity Building of Nurses and Public Health Professionals.

机构信息

Department of Physical Therapy, School of Allied Health Sciences, Walailak University, Nakhon Si Thammarat 80160, Thailand.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 5;18(13):7199. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18137199.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the need for research training among nurses and health professionals in a rural province of Thailand and to evaluate the effectiveness of the interventions designed to address the identified factors. This two-phase study used a cross-sectional design with one-group pre- and post-tests. In phase I, 149 subjects from 16 subdistrict health promoting hospitals and one district hospital were sampled. As an intervention, an academic-practice team approach to research capacity building was designed. Twenty-four volunteers completed a three-time point assessment of intervention in phase II. Data were collected using self-report questionnaires and analyzed using bivariate and multivariate statistics. Phase-I results indicated that 33.6% of subjects were involved in the research implementation. They had a moderate perception of research barriers and capacity. The research experiences, capacity, and barriers associated with the research implementation were described in detail ( < 0.05). The only positive predictor of research implementation was research training ( < 0.001). The intervention improved 24 participants' competency ( < 0.05). Most of their research proposals had received ethics approval and a small grant. These findings highlight the efforts of innovative research capacity development and its impact on research and health practices among nurses and health professionals.

摘要

本研究旨在确定泰国农村省份护士和卫生专业人员的研究培训需求,并评估旨在解决已确定因素的干预措施的效果。这项两阶段研究采用了横断面设计,具有一组预测试和后测试。在第一阶段,从 16 个分区卫生促进医院和 1 个地区医院抽取了 149 名受试者。作为干预措施,设计了一种学术实践团队方法来增强研究能力。第二阶段有 24 名志愿者完成了三次干预评估。使用自我报告问卷收集数据,并使用双变量和多变量统计进行分析。第一阶段的结果表明,33.6%的受试者参与了研究实施。他们对研究障碍和能力有中等的认识。详细描述了与研究实施相关的研究经验、能力和障碍(<0.05)。研究实施的唯一积极预测因素是研究培训(<0.001)。干预措施提高了 24 名参与者的能力(<0.05)。他们的大多数研究提案都获得了伦理批准和小额资助。这些发现强调了创新研究能力发展的努力及其对护士和卫生专业人员的研究和卫生实践的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80d7/8297271/d25e15fa6a9d/ijerph-18-07199-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验