Melender Hanna-Leena, Salmela Susanne, Pape Bernd
Department of Social and Health Care, VAMK University of Applied Sciences, Vaasa, Finland.
Research and Development Unit, Vaasa Central Hospital, Vaasa, Finland.
SAGE Open Nurs. 2020 May 28;6:2377960820925959. doi: 10.1177/2377960820925959. eCollection 2020 Jan-Dec.
Education is one of the central interventions to promote evidence-based practice (EBP) in service organizations. An educational intervention to promote EBP among health and social care professionals was implemented in a Finnish hospital. The aim of this study was to explore the outcomes of an educational intervention, focusing on the basics of EBP for health and social care professionals, using a quasi-experimental study design. The data were collected with a questionnaire before, immediately after, and 6 months after the education ( = 48). The data were analyzed with descriptive statistics and nonparametric tests. Immediately after the education, an increase was found in the EBP knowledge of participants, in participants' confidence in their own ability to conduct database searches and read scientific articles, and in the number of participants using databases at work. Six months after the education, improvements were still found between the first and the third measurement in the participants' knowledge and confidence in their own ability to conduct database searches and read scientific articles. The number of those who had made an initiative about a research topic regarding the development of their own work had increased from the first to the third measurement. The educational intervention produced a statistically significant improvement on most of the areas evaluated. Significant improvements were often found even 6 months after the education was finished. However, the low completion rate and a quasi-experimental before and after design limit the conclusions that can be derived from this study.
教育是服务机构中促进循证实践(EBP)的核心干预措施之一。芬兰一家医院实施了一项旨在促进卫生和社会护理专业人员循证实践的教育干预措施。本研究的目的是采用准实验研究设计,探讨教育干预的效果,重点关注卫生和社会护理专业人员循证实践的基础知识。在教育前、教育刚结束后以及教育6个月后,通过问卷调查收集数据(n = 48)。采用描述性统计和非参数检验对数据进行分析。教育刚结束后,参与者的循证实践知识、参与者对自己进行数据库检索和阅读科学文章能力的信心以及工作中使用数据库的参与者数量均有所增加。教育6个月后,在参与者的知识以及对自己进行数据库检索和阅读科学文章能力的信心方面,第一次和第三次测量之间仍有改善。就自身工作发展提出研究课题倡议的人数从第一次测量到第三次测量有所增加。教育干预在大多数评估领域产生了统计学上的显著改善。即使在教育结束6个月后,也经常发现有显著改善。然而,低完成率以及前后准实验设计限制了本研究可得出的结论。