Araghi Marzieh, Fidler-Benaoudia Miranda, Arnold Melina, Rutherford Mark, Bardot Aude, Ferlay Jacques, Bucher Oliver, De Prithwish, Engholm Gerda, Gavin Anna, Kozie Serena, Little Alana, Møller Bjørn, St Jacques Nathalie, Tervonen Hanna, Walsh Paul, Woods Ryan, O'Connell Dianne L, Baldwin David, Elwood Mark, Siesling Sabine, Bray Freddie, Soerjomataram Isabelle
Cancer Surveillance Branch, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, Rhône-Alpes, France.
Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention Research, Holy Cross Centre, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Thorax. 2022 Apr;77(4):378-390. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2020-216555. Epub 2021 Jul 19.
Lung cancer has a poor prognosis that varies internationally when assessed by the two major histological subgroups (non-small cell (NSCLC) and small cell (SCLC)).
236 114 NSCLC and 43 167 SCLC cases diagnosed during 2010-2014 in Australia, Canada, Denmark, Ireland, New Zealand, Norway and the UK were included in the analyses. One-year and 3-year age-standardised net survival (NS) was estimated by sex, histological type, stage and country.
One-year and 3-year NS was consistently higher for Canada and Norway, and lower for the UK, New Zealand and Ireland, irrespective of stage at diagnosis. Three-year NS for NSCLC ranged from 19.7% for the UK to 27.1% for Canada for men and was consistently higher for women (25.3% in the UK; 35.0% in Canada) partly because men were diagnosed at more advanced stages. International differences in survival for NSCLC were largest for regional stage and smallest at the advanced stage. For SCLC, 3-year NS also showed a clear female advantage with the highest being for Canada (13.8% for women; 9.1% for men) and Norway (12.8% for women; 9.7% for men).
Distribution of stage at diagnosis among lung cancer cases differed by sex, histological subtype and country, which may partly explain observed survival differences. Yet, survival differences were also observed within stages, suggesting that quality of treatment, healthcare system factors and prevalence of comorbid conditions may also influence survival. Other possible explanations include differences in data collection practice, as well as differences in histological verification, staging and coding across jurisdictions.
肺癌的预后较差,在通过两个主要组织学亚组(非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)和小细胞肺癌(SCLC))评估时,其在国际上存在差异。
分析纳入了2010年至2014年期间在澳大利亚、加拿大、丹麦、爱尔兰、新西兰、挪威和英国诊断出的236114例非小细胞肺癌和43167例小细胞肺癌病例。按性别、组织学类型、分期和国家估算了1年和3年年龄标准化净生存率(NS)。
无论诊断时的分期如何,加拿大和挪威的1年和3年净生存率始终较高,而英国、新西兰和爱尔兰的则较低。非小细胞肺癌男性的3年净生存率从英国的19.7%到加拿大的27.1%不等,女性的则始终较高(英国为25.3%;加拿大为35.0%),部分原因是男性被诊断时处于更晚期阶段。非小细胞肺癌生存的国际差异在区域分期时最大,在晚期时最小。对于小细胞肺癌,3年净生存率也显示出明显的女性优势,加拿大最高(女性为13.8%;男性为9.1%),挪威次之(女性为12.8%;男性为9.7%)。
肺癌病例诊断时分期的分布因性别、组织学亚型和国家而异,这可能部分解释了观察到的生存差异。然而,在各分期内也观察到了生存差异,这表明治疗质量、医疗系统因素和合并症患病率也可能影响生存。其他可能的解释包括数据收集做法的差异,以及不同司法管辖区在组织学验证、分期和编码方面的差异。