Comparison of High Throughput Sequencing to Standard Protocols for Virus Detection in Berry Crops.

We completed a comprehensive study comparing virus detection between high throughput sequencing (HTS) and standard protocols in 30 berry selections (12 , 10 , and eight ) with known virus profiles. The study examined temporal detection of viruses at four sampling times encompassing two growing seasons. Within the standard protocols, reverse transcription (RT) PCR proved better than biological indexing. Detection of known viruses by HTS and RT-PCR nearly mirrored each other. HTS provided superior detection compared with RT-PCR on a wide spectrum of variants and discovery of novel viruses. More importantly, in most cases in which the two protocols showed parallel virus detection, 11 viruses in 16 selections were not consistently detected by both methods at all sampling points. Based on these data, we propose a testing requirement of four sampling times over two growing seasons for berry and potentially other crops, to ensure that no virus remains undetected independent of titer, distribution, or other virus-virus or virus-host interactions.