Psychology Department, Université de Lorraine, Nancy, France.
Int J Psychoanal. 2021 Oct;102(5):878-905. doi: 10.1080/00207578.2021.1932514. Epub 2021 Jul 21.
In this paper I offer an overview of the possible links between psychoanalytical metapsychology and contemporary work in neuroscience concerning entropy and the free energy principle. After briefly describing the theory of living systems put forward by the neuroscientist Karl Friston based on the notion of entropy, we sum up the use of the notion of free energy by Friston and Freud. I then analyze how these notions improve the intelligibility of psychic functioning and can be associated with several psychoanalytical concepts, in particular the death drive. I approach from the same perspective the regulation of free energy associated with psychic envelopes and early intersubjectivity. It thus appears that the psychic apparatus can be considered at its different levels, from the most primary to the most secondary, as having the essential function of reducing entropy and free energy. Various forms of "failure" of this process of linking, regulation and transformation of energy within the psychic apparatus could be considered as the origin of different psychopathological manifestations as suggested in the last part of this paper.
在本文中,我概述了精神分析元心理学与当代神经科学中关于熵和自由能原理的研究之间可能存在的联系。在简要描述了神经科学家卡尔·弗里斯顿(Karl Friston)基于熵的概念提出的生命系统理论之后,我们总结了弗里斯顿(Friston)和弗洛伊德(Freud)对自由能概念的使用。然后,我分析了这些概念如何提高心理功能的可理解性,并可以与几个精神分析概念相关联,特别是死亡驱力。我从相同的角度探讨了与心理包络和早期主体间性相关的自由能调节。因此,似乎可以从最原始到最次要的不同层面,将心理器官视为具有降低熵和自由能的基本功能。可以认为,在心理器官内,能量的这种连接、调节和转换过程的各种形式的“失败”,可能是不同精神病理表现的起源,正如本文最后一部分所表明的那样。