• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器学习在预测小儿外伤性脑损伤结果中的应用。

Application of machine learning to predict the outcome of pediatric traumatic brain injury.

机构信息

Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla, 90110, Thailand.

Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla, 90110, Thailand.

出版信息

Chin J Traumatol. 2021 Nov;24(6):350-355. doi: 10.1016/j.cjtee.2021.06.003. Epub 2021 Jun 8.

DOI:10.1016/j.cjtee.2021.06.003
PMID:34284922
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8606603/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) generally causes mortality and disability, particularly in children. Machine learning (ML) is a computer algorithm, applied as a clinical prediction tool. The present study aims to assess the predictability of ML for the functional outcomes of pediatric TBI.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was performed targeting children with TBI who were admitted to the trauma center of southern Thailand between January 2009 and July 2020. The patient was excluded if he/she (1) did not undergo a CT scan of the brain, (2) died within the first 24 h, (3) had unavailable complete medical records during admission, or (4) was unable to provide updated outcomes. Clinical and radiologic characteristics were collected such as vital signs, Glasgow coma scale score, and characteristics of intracranial injuries. The functional outcome was assessed using the King's Outcome Scale for Childhood Head Injury, which was thus dichotomized into favourable outcomes and unfavourable outcomes: good recovery and moderate disability were categorized as the former, whereas death, vegetative state, and severe disability were categorized as the latter. The prognostic factors were estimated using traditional binary logistic regression. By data splitting, 70% of data were used for training the ML models and the remaining 30% were used for testing the ML models. The supervised algorithms including support vector machines, neural networks, random forest, logistic regression, naive Bayes and k-nearest neighbor were performed for training of the ML models. Therefore, the ML models were tested for the predictive performances by the testing datasets.

RESULTS

There were 828 patients in the cohort. The median age was 72 months (interquartile range 104.7 months, range 2-179 months). Road traffic accident was the most common mechanism of injury, accounting for 68.7%. At hospital discharge, favourable outcomes were achieved in 97.0% of patients, while the mortality rate was 2.2%. Glasgow coma scale score, hypotension, pupillary light reflex, and subarachnoid haemorrhage were associated with TBI outcomes following traditional binary logistic regression; hence, the 4 prognostic factors were used for building ML models and testing performance. The support vector machine model had the best performance for predicting pediatric TBI outcomes: sensitivity 0.95, specificity 0.60, positive predicted value 0.99, negative predictive value 1.0; accuracy 0.94, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.78.

CONCLUSION

The ML algorithms of the present study have a high sensitivity; therefore they have the potential to be screening tools for predicting functional outcomes and counselling prognosis in general practice of pediatric TBIs.

摘要
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/16f7/8606603/f77ac3fc8945/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/16f7/8606603/f77ac3fc8945/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/16f7/8606603/f77ac3fc8945/gr1.jpg

目的

创伤性脑损伤(TBI)通常会导致死亡和残疾,尤其是在儿童中。机器学习(ML)是一种计算机算法,可用作临床预测工具。本研究旨在评估 ML 对儿科 TBI 功能结局的预测能力。

方法

本研究为回顾性队列研究,纳入 2009 年 1 月至 2020 年 7 月期间在泰国南部创伤中心就诊的 TBI 患儿。如果患儿(1)未行颅脑 CT 检查,(2)伤后 24 h 内死亡,(3)入院期间无法获得完整的病历资料,或(4)无法提供最新结局,则将其排除。收集临床和影像学特征,如生命体征、格拉斯哥昏迷评分和颅内损伤特征。采用儿童头部创伤 Kings 结局量表评估功能结局,将结局分为有利结局和不利结局:良好恢复和中度残疾为有利结局,死亡、植物状态和重度残疾为不利结局。采用传统二项逻辑回归估计预后因素。通过数据分割,70%的数据用于训练 ML 模型,30%的数据用于测试 ML 模型。采用支持向量机、神经网络、随机森林、逻辑回归、朴素贝叶斯和 k-最近邻等有监督算法对 ML 模型进行训练。因此,通过测试数据集来测试 ML 模型的预测性能。

结果

本研究纳入 828 例患儿。患儿的中位年龄为 72 个月(四分位距 104.7 个月,范围 2-179 个月)。道路交通伤是最常见的致伤机制,占 68.7%。出院时,97.0%的患儿结局良好,死亡率为 2.2%。格拉斯哥昏迷评分、低血压、瞳孔光反射和蛛网膜下腔出血与传统二项逻辑回归后的 TBI 结局相关,因此,选择这 4 个预后因素构建 ML 模型并测试性能。支持向量机模型在预测儿科 TBI 结局方面表现最佳:敏感度为 0.95,特异度为 0.60,阳性预测值为 0.99,阴性预测值为 1.0;准确率为 0.94,受试者工作特征曲线下面积为 0.78。

结论

本研究的 ML 算法具有较高的敏感度,因此它们有可能成为儿科 TBI 功能结局预测和一般实践预后咨询的筛查工具。

相似文献

1
Application of machine learning to predict the outcome of pediatric traumatic brain injury.机器学习在预测小儿外伤性脑损伤结果中的应用。
Chin J Traumatol. 2021 Nov;24(6):350-355. doi: 10.1016/j.cjtee.2021.06.003. Epub 2021 Jun 8.
2
Machine Learning to Predict Three Types of Outcomes After Traumatic Brain Injury Using Data at Admission: A Multi-Center Study for Development and Validation.机器学习使用入院时的数据预测创伤性脑损伤后的三种结局:一项用于开发和验证的多中心研究。
J Neurotrauma. 2023 Aug;40(15-16):1694-1706. doi: 10.1089/neu.2022.0515. Epub 2023 Apr 24.
3
Impact of Glasgow Coma Scale score and pupil parameters on mortality rate and outcome in pediatric and adult severe traumatic brain injury: a retrospective, multicenter cohort study.格拉斯哥昏迷评分和瞳孔参数对儿童和成人严重创伤性脑损伤患者死亡率和预后的影响:一项回顾性、多中心队列研究。
J Neurosurg. 2017 Mar;126(3):760-767. doi: 10.3171/2016.1.JNS152385. Epub 2016 Apr 1.
4
Machine-learning analysis outperforms conventional statistical models and CT classification systems in predicting 6-month outcomes in pediatric patients sustaining traumatic brain injury.机器学习分析在预测外伤性脑损伤患儿 6 个月结局方面优于传统统计学模型和 CT 分类系统。
Neurosurg Focus. 2018 Nov 1;45(5):E2. doi: 10.3171/2018.8.FOCUS17773.
5
Comparison of intracranial injury predictability between machine learning algorithms and the nomogram in pediatric traumatic brain injury.机器学习算法与列线图预测儿童外伤性脑损伤颅内损伤的比较。
Neurosurg Focus. 2021 Nov;51(5):E7. doi: 10.3171/2021.8.FOCUS2155.
6
Development and validation of a prehospital-stage prediction tool for traumatic brain injury: a multicentre retrospective cohort study in Korea.开发和验证创伤性脑损伤的院前阶段预测工具:韩国多中心回顾性队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jan 12;12(1):e055918. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055918.
7
Machine learning algorithms performed no better than regression models for prognostication in traumatic brain injury.机器学习算法在预测创伤性脑损伤方面并不比回归模型表现得更好。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2020 Jun;122:95-107. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.03.005. Epub 2020 Mar 20.
8
Comparison of machine learning models to predict long-term outcomes after severe traumatic brain injury.比较机器学习模型预测严重创伤性脑损伤后长期预后的能力。
Neurosurg Focus. 2023 Jun;54(6):E14. doi: 10.3171/2023.3.FOCUS2376.
9
Machine Learning to Predict In-Hospital Morbidity and Mortality after Traumatic Brain Injury.机器学习预测创伤性脑损伤后的住院期间发病率和死亡率。
J Neurotrauma. 2020 Jan 1;37(1):202-210. doi: 10.1089/neu.2018.6276. Epub 2019 Sep 18.
10
Analysis of long-term (median 10.5 years) outcomes in children presenting with traumatic brain injury and an initial Glasgow Coma Scale score of 3 or 4.对初始格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分为3或4分的创伤性脑损伤患儿的长期(中位时间10.5年)预后分析。
J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2015 Oct;16(4):410-9. doi: 10.3171/2015.3.PEDS14679. Epub 2015 Jul 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Employing machine learning for early detection of poly-victimization in rural children: a survey study in China's Chaoshan region.运用机器学习对农村儿童多重受害情况进行早期检测:中国潮汕地区的一项调查研究
BMC Public Health. 2025 Jul 5;25(1):2391. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-23610-6.
2
Comparison of Machine Learning Models in Predicting Mental Health Sequelae Following Concussion in Youth.机器学习模型在预测青少年脑震荡后心理健康后遗症中的比较
AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc. 2025 Jun 10;2025:422-431. eCollection 2025.
3
Machine learning-based prediction of mortality in pediatric trauma patients.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical Nomogram Predicting Intracranial Injury in Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury.预测小儿创伤性脑损伤颅内损伤的临床列线图
J Pediatr Neurosci. 2020 Oct-Dec;15(4):409-415. doi: 10.4103/jpn.JPN_11_20. Epub 2021 Jan 19.
2
Machine learning approaches to study glioblastoma: A review of the last decade of applications.机器学习在胶质母细胞瘤研究中的应用:对过去十年应用的综述。
Cancer Rep (Hoboken). 2019 Dec;2(6):e1226. doi: 10.1002/cnr2.1226.
3
Pattern and Outcome of Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury at Hawassa University Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, Southern Ethiopia: Observational Cross-Sectional Study.
基于机器学习的小儿创伤患者死亡率预测
Front Pediatr. 2025 Feb 27;13:1522845. doi: 10.3389/fped.2025.1522845. eCollection 2025.
4
Pediatric Predictive Artificial Intelligence Implemented in Clinical Practice from 2010 to 2021: A Systematic Review.2010年至2021年在临床实践中应用的儿科预测人工智能:一项系统评价。
Appl Clin Inform. 2025 May;16(3):477-487. doi: 10.1055/a-2521-1508. Epub 2025 Jan 21.
5
Comparison of Machine Learning Models in Predicting Mental Health Sequelae Following Concussion in Youth.机器学习模型在预测青少年脑震荡后心理健康后遗症中的比较
medRxiv. 2025 Jan 3:2025.01.02.24319733. doi: 10.1101/2025.01.02.24319733.
6
Applications of machine learning in pediatric traumatic brain injury (pTBI): a systematic review of the literature.机器学习在儿科创伤性脑损伤(pTBI)中的应用:文献系统评价。
Neurosurg Rev. 2024 Oct 5;47(1):737. doi: 10.1007/s10143-024-02955-3.
7
Artificial Intelligence in Pediatric Emergency Medicine: Applications, Challenges, and Future Perspectives.人工智能在儿科急诊医学中的应用、挑战及未来展望
Biomedicines. 2024 May 30;12(6):1220. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines12061220.
8
Unveiling the Influence of AI Predictive Analytics on Patient Outcomes: A Comprehensive Narrative Review.揭示人工智能预测分析对患者预后的影响:一项全面的叙述性综述。
Cureus. 2024 May 9;16(5):e59954. doi: 10.7759/cureus.59954. eCollection 2024 May.
9
Artificial Intelligence-Enhanced Neurocritical Care for Traumatic Brain Injury : Past, Present and Future.人工智能助力创伤性脑损伤的神经重症监护:过去、现在与未来
J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2024 Sep;67(5):493-509. doi: 10.3340/jkns.2023.0195. Epub 2024 Jan 8.
10
Machine learning-based classification of pineal germinoma from magnetic resonance imaging.基于机器学习从磁共振成像对松果体生殖细胞瘤进行分类
World Neurosurg X. 2023 Jun 21;20:100231. doi: 10.1016/j.wnsx.2023.100231. eCollection 2023 Oct.
埃塞俄比亚南部哈瓦萨大学综合专科医院小儿创伤性脑损伤的模式与结局:观察性横断面研究
Emerg Med Int. 2020 Jan 29;2020:1965231. doi: 10.1155/2020/1965231. eCollection 2020.
4
Machine learning algorithms performed no better than regression models for prognostication in traumatic brain injury.机器学习算法在预测创伤性脑损伤方面并不比回归模型表现得更好。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2020 Jun;122:95-107. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.03.005. Epub 2020 Mar 20.
5
Prognostic Factors and Nomogram Predicting Survival in Diffuse Astrocytoma.弥漫性星形细胞瘤生存预后因素及列线图预测
J Neurosci Rural Pract. 2020 Jan;11(1):135-143. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-3403446. Epub 2020 Mar 3.
6
Prediction of Early TBI Mortality Using a Machine Learning Approach in a LMIC Population.在低收入和中等收入国家人群中使用机器学习方法预测早期创伤性脑损伤死亡率
Front Neurol. 2020 Jan 24;10:1366. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.01366. eCollection 2019.
7
Development and Validation of a Nomogram for Predicting the Mortality after Penetrating Traumatic Brain Injury.用于预测穿透性创伤性脑损伤后死亡率的列线图的开发与验证
Bull Emerg Trauma. 2019 Oct;7(4):347-354. doi: 10.29252/beat-070402.
8
Predictive Risk Factors for Early Seizures in Traumatic Brain Injury.创伤性脑损伤早期癫痫发作的预测风险因素
J Neurosci Rural Pract. 2019 Oct;10(4):582-587. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1700791. Epub 2019 Oct 23.
9
Predicting outcome in patients with moderate to severe traumatic brain injury using electroencephalography.使用脑电图预测中重度创伤性脑损伤患者的预后。
Crit Care. 2019 Dec 11;23(1):401. doi: 10.1186/s13054-019-2656-6.
10
Machine learning applications for the prediction of surgical site infection in neurological operations.机器学习在神经外科手术部位感染预测中的应用。
Neurosurg Focus. 2019 Aug 1;47(2):E7. doi: 10.3171/2019.5.FOCUS19241.