Staffordshire University Faculty of Health Sciences, Stoke-on-Trent, UK
Keele University Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, Keele, Staffordshire, UK.
BMJ Open. 2024 Sep 25;14(9):e086727. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086727.
The use of volatile anaesthetic agents for the sedation of patients requiring critical care treatment offers several theoretical advantages over intravenous sedation, which may be of benefit in neurocritical care. However, there are concerns that they may increase intracranial pressure. The objective of this systematic review is to assess whether, and if so, to what extent volatile anaesthetic agents affect intracranial pressure, cerebral blood flow (CBF), cerebral oximetry and cerebrovascular autoregulation. If sufficient data exist, subgroup analyses will be conducted in traumatic brain injury and decompressive craniectomy patients.
A database search of PubMed, Medline (including Medline plus), CINAHL (including CINAHL Plus), Embase databases and the Cochrane Central Controlled Trials Register without time limits will be conducted. The search results will be screened by title and abstract by two independent researchers on a rule-in basis against predetermined criteria-controlled studies in humans of contemporary fluorinated volatile anaesthetic agents against a control, which measures intracranial pressure, CBF, cerebral oximetry or cerebrovascular autoregulation. Articles responsive to screening will then be reviewed in full text by two independent researchers, requiring consensus or a tie-break by a third independent researcher. Reference lists and a non-generative AI tool will be examined for missed articles, with all identified articles being reviewed in full text by two independent researchers. The included articles will be assessed for risk of bias and will have data extracted by two independent researchers. If sufficient data exist, a meta-analysis will be performed; otherwise, a narrative description of outcomes will be performed.
No ethics approval will be sought for this systematic review. This study has no explicit funding. The results of this study will be disseminated in a peer-reviewed journal, in a conference presentation and on PROSPERO.
PROSPERO number CRD42023474587.
在需要重症监护治疗的患者中,使用挥发性麻醉剂镇静具有优于静脉内镇静的几个理论优势,这在神经重症监护中可能是有益的。然而,人们担心它们可能会增加颅内压。本系统评价的目的是评估挥发性麻醉剂是否会、以及在何种程度上影响颅内压、脑血流(CBF)、脑氧饱和度和脑血管自动调节。如果有足够的数据,将在创伤性脑损伤和去骨瓣减压术患者中进行亚组分析。
将对 PubMed、Medline(包括 Medline plus)、CINAHL(包括 CINAHL Plus)、Embase 数据库和 Cochrane 中央对照试验注册库进行无时间限制的数据库检索。根据预定的标准,将对检索结果进行筛选,对标题和摘要进行筛选,以规则纳入对当代含氟挥发性麻醉剂与对照(测量颅内压、CBF、脑氧饱和度或脑血管自动调节)的对照研究。对符合筛选标准的文章进行全文审查,由两名独立研究人员进行审查,需要共识或由第三名独立研究人员打破平局。将检查参考文献列表和非生成性 AI 工具,以查找遗漏的文章,所有确定的文章都将由两名独立研究人员进行全文审查。将对纳入的文章进行偏倚风险评估,并由两名独立研究人员提取数据。如果有足够的数据,将进行荟萃分析;否则,将对结果进行叙述性描述。
本系统评价不需要伦理批准。本研究没有明确的资金。本研究的结果将在同行评议的期刊、会议报告和 PROSPERO 上发表。
PROSPERO 编号 CRD42023474587。