Baron Anna Jetske, Flokstra-de Blok Bertine M J, Kerstjens Huib A M, Koopmans-Klein Gineke, Price David B, Sellink Andrea A, Tsiligianni Ioanna, Kocks Janwillem W H
General Practitioners Research Institute, Groningen, the Netherlands.
University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, GRIAC Research Institute, Groningen, the Netherlands.
J Asthma Allergy. 2021 Jul 12;14:851-861. doi: 10.2147/JAA.S292943. eCollection 2021.
Many patients with asthma still have insufficient disease control, despite the availability of effective treatment options. A substantial proportion of patients appear to rely more on short-acting beta-agonist (SABA) rather than on anti-inflammatory maintenance treatment. The aim of this study was to describe differences in indicators of asthma symptoms and exacerbations among patients using more or less SABA than the guideline-recommended threshold of <3 times/week.
Data from Dutch respondents in the European REcognise Asthma and LInk to Symptoms and Experience (REALISE) survey were used in this post hoc analysis. The survey included asthma patients aged 18-50 years with at least two prescriptions for their asthma in the past two years. SABA use was categorized into two groups: <3 (low-SABA users) or ≥3 (high-SABA users) times in the last week.
Of the 736 asthma patients, 21% did not use SABA and 19% used SABA 1 to 2 times (all low SABA users) and 60% used SABA ≥3 times (high SABA users) in the last week. The majority of high and low SABA users also reported using an ICS-containing treatment. Significant differences were found for all indicators related to exacerbations (p<0.001): high SABA users more frequently used antibiotics and oral steroids, more frequently visited the emergency departments or needed an overnight hospital stay. Indicators of asthma symptoms were not significantly different between both groups.
The majority of a Dutch asthmatic population reported high SABA use and had frequent moderate/severe exacerbations. More effective interventions are needed to change healthcare providers' and patients' behaviours to improve care and reduce SABA (over)use.
尽管有有效的治疗方案,但许多哮喘患者的疾病控制仍不充分。相当一部分患者似乎更多地依赖短效β-激动剂(SABA),而非抗炎维持治疗。本研究的目的是描述使用SABA次数高于或低于指南推荐阈值(每周<3次)的患者在哮喘症状和急性加重指标上的差异。
本事后分析使用了欧洲“认识哮喘并将其与症状和体验联系起来”(REALISE)调查中荷兰受访者的数据。该调查纳入了年龄在18至50岁之间、过去两年中至少有两份哮喘处方的哮喘患者。SABA使用情况分为两组:上周<3次(低SABA使用者)或≥3次(高SABA使用者)。
在736名哮喘患者中,21%未使用SABA,19%使用SABA 1至2次(均为低SABA使用者),60%上周使用SABA≥3次(高SABA使用者)。大多数高SABA使用者和低SABA使用者也报告使用了含吸入性糖皮质激素(ICS)的治疗。在所有与急性加重相关的指标上均发现了显著差异(p<0.001):高SABA使用者更频繁地使用抗生素和口服类固醇,更频繁地前往急诊科或需要住院过夜。两组之间哮喘症状指标无显著差异。
荷兰大多数哮喘患者报告SABA使用频率高,且频繁出现中度/重度急性加重。需要更有效的干预措施来改变医疗服务提供者和患者的行为,以改善治疗并减少SABA的(过度)使用。