Tian Felicia F, Qian Yue, Qian Zhenchao
Department of Sociology, Fudan University, China.
Department of Sociology, University of British Columbia, Canada.
Res Soc Stratif Mobil. 2018 Aug;56:12-20. doi: 10.1016/j.rssm.2018.06.001. Epub 2018 Jun 15.
China's household registration system () has created an institutional boundary for the social integration of migrants, but few studies have explored if barriers vary by city. We investigate the value of locality in Shanghai and Shenzhen by comparing their patterns of intermarriage between locals and migrants. We hypothesize that levels of intermarriage reflect the rigidity of the barrier- the likelihood of intermarriage is lower and tradeoffs for local are higher if one city has more stringent policies than the other. Using data from the 2005 mini-census, we find support for our hypothesis. Shanghai, in which internal migrants in China find it most difficult to secure local exhibits lower levels of intermarriage and lower levels of locality-education exchange between locals and migrants compared to Shenzhen. The findings suggest that the decentralization of China's system and subsequent varying policies have made locality an increasingly salient factor in shaping migrants' integration and social inequality.
中国的户籍制度为外来人口的社会融合设置了制度界限,但很少有研究探讨这些障碍是否因城市而异。我们通过比较上海和深圳本地人与外来人口的通婚模式,来研究户籍所在地的影响。我们假设通婚水平反映了户籍障碍的严格程度——如果一个城市的户籍政策比另一个城市更严格,那么通婚的可能性就更低,本地户籍的代价就更高。利用2005年小普查的数据,我们的假设得到了支持。在中国,外来人口最难获得上海本地户籍,与深圳相比,上海本地人与外来人口之间的通婚水平较低,户籍所在地与教育交流水平也较低。研究结果表明,中国户籍制度的分散化以及随之而来的不同户籍政策,使得户籍所在地成为影响外来人口融合和社会不平等的一个日益突出的因素。