• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中国的异族通婚与社会排斥

intermarriage and social exclusion in China.

作者信息

Wang Yu, Schwartz Christine R

机构信息

Duke Kunshan University, China.

Department of Sociology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, United States.

出版信息

Res Soc Stratif Mobil. 2018 Aug;56:28-39. doi: 10.1016/j.rssm.2018.06.002. Epub 2018 Jun 15.

DOI:10.1016/j.rssm.2018.06.002
PMID:30122798
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6095668/
Abstract

is a key marker of status in contemporary China. Urban status confers large economic benefits such as preferential access to good schools, prestigious occupations, and state-subsidized welfare benefits. As such, trends in intermarriage convey important but underappreciated information about social mobility in China. This article examines trends in intermarriage between 1958 and 2008. We find that intermarriage is surprisingly common and has grown steadily since 1985. Hypotheses derived from Western contexts do little to explain this trend. Increased education, economic inequality, and availability each fail to explain trends as predicted in prior work. A common hypothesis is that increased inequality should reduce intermarriage by making it more costly to "marry down." We find the opposite-increasing inequality is associated with increasing intermarriage, particularly between urban men and rural women, which is consistent with the hypothesis that the costs of marrying down may be outweighed by the incentives to marry up in this context. Our results also suggest conversion plays a key role in increased intermarriage. These findings highlight the uniqueness of the Chinese context and suggest that standard hypotheses about assortative mating may not be applicable in contexts with strong state-controlled social boundaries.

摘要

是当代中国社会地位的一个关键标志。城市地位带来巨大的经济利益,比如优先进入优质学校、获得有声望的职业以及享受国家补贴的福利。因此,通婚趋势传达了有关中国社会流动的重要但未得到充分重视的信息。本文考察了1958年至2008年间的通婚趋势。我们发现通婚现象惊人地普遍,并且自1985年以来一直在稳步增长。源自西方背景的假设几乎无法解释这一趋势。教育水平提高、经济不平等加剧以及可获得性等因素均无法像先前研究预测的那样解释通婚趋势。一个常见的假设是,不平等加剧会使“下嫁”成本增加,从而减少通婚。但我们发现情况恰恰相反——不平等加剧与通婚增加有关,尤其是城市男性与农村女性之间的通婚,这与在这种情况下“下嫁”成本可能被“上嫁”动机所抵消的假设一致。我们的研究结果还表明身份转换在通婚增加中起到关键作用。这些发现凸显了中国背景的独特性,并表明关于 assortative mating 的标准假设可能不适用于存在强大国家控制的社会界限的背景。 (注:“assortative mating”可能是“选型婚配”之类的专业术语,原文未给出准确中文释义)

相似文献

1
intermarriage and social exclusion in China.中国的异族通婚与社会排斥
Res Soc Stratif Mobil. 2018 Aug;56:28-39. doi: 10.1016/j.rssm.2018.06.002. Epub 2018 Jun 15.
2
Assortative Mating by Education and Hukou in Shanghai.上海教育程度与户籍的婚姻匹配情况
Chin Sociol Rev. 2017;49(3):239-262. doi: 10.1080/21620555.2017.1288066. Epub 2017 Mar 20.
3
Locality and Intermarriages in Two Chinese Cities: Shanghai and Shenzhen.中国两座城市的地域与通婚情况:上海和深圳。
Res Soc Stratif Mobil. 2018 Aug;56:12-20. doi: 10.1016/j.rssm.2018.06.001. Epub 2018 Jun 15.
4
Economic Resources, Cultural Matching, and the Rural-Urban Boundary in China's Marriage Market.经济资源、文化匹配与中国婚姻市场中的城乡边界
J Marriage Fam. 2019 Jun;81(3):567-583. doi: 10.1111/jomf.12559. Epub 2019 Mar 1.
5
Social origins, hukou conversion, and the wellbeing of urban residents in contemporary China.社会出身、户口转换与当代中国城市居民的幸福感。
Soc Sci Res. 2013 Jan;42(1):71-89. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2012.08.004. Epub 2012 Aug 23.
6
The Transition to First Marriage in China, 1966-2008: An Examination of Gender Differences in Education and Status.1966 - 2008年中国初婚情况:教育与地位的性别差异考察
Eur J Popul. 2016 Jan 25;32(1):129-154. doi: 10.1007/s10680-015-9364-y. eCollection 2016 Feb.
7
Hukou-based rural-urban disparities in maternal health service utilization and delivery modes in two Chinese cities in Guangdong Province.基于户口的城乡差异对广东省两个城市孕产妇卫生服务利用和分娩方式的影响。
Int J Equity Health. 2021 Jun 22;20(1):145. doi: 10.1186/s12939-021-01485-4.
8
Marrying Up by Marrying Down: Status Exchange between Social Origin and Education in the United States.下嫁以求高攀:美国社会出身与教育之间的地位交换
Sociol Sci. 2016 Nov;3:1003-1027. doi: 10.15195/v3.a44. Epub 2016 Nov 28.
9
Do Rural-Urban Identities Affect Individuals' Health? Evidence From China.城乡身份认同会影响个人健康吗?来自中国的证据。
Inquiry. 2022 Jan-Dec;59:469580221104370. doi: 10.1177/00469580221104370.
10
Urban-rural disparities in child nutrition-related health outcomes in China: The role of hukou policy.中国儿童营养相关健康结果的城乡差异:户籍政策的作用。
BMC Public Health. 2015 Nov 23;15:1159. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-2517-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Marital Bargaining and Assortative Mating on Fertility Preference : Evidence based on Cross-sectional Data in China.生育偏好上的婚姻谈判与选择性婚配:基于中国横断面数据的证据
F1000Res. 2025 Jul 30;13:659. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.151196.4. eCollection 2024.
2
Association between secondhand smoke exposure in pregnant women and their socioeconomic status and its interaction with age: a cross-sectional study.孕妇二手烟暴露与其社会经济地位的关系及其与年龄的交互作用:一项横断面研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Sep 9;22(1):695. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-04968-6.
3
Locality and Intermarriages in Two Chinese Cities: Shanghai and Shenzhen.

本文引用的文献

1
Assortative Mating by Education and Hukou in Shanghai.上海教育程度与户籍的婚姻匹配情况
Chin Sociol Rev. 2017;49(3):239-262. doi: 10.1080/21620555.2017.1288066. Epub 2017 Mar 20.
2
Income inequality and educational assortative mating: Evidence from the Luxembourg Income Study.收入不平等与教育选择性婚配:来自卢森堡收入研究的证据。
Soc Sci Res. 2015 Jul;52:253-69. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2015.02.001. Epub 2015 Feb 11.
3
Income inequality in today's China.中国当今的收入不平等问题。
中国两座城市的地域与通婚情况:上海和深圳。
Res Soc Stratif Mobil. 2018 Aug;56:12-20. doi: 10.1016/j.rssm.2018.06.001. Epub 2018 Jun 15.
4
The Nonlinear Linkage Between Earnings Homogamy and Earnings Inequality Among Married Couples.已婚夫妇薪酬同型婚配与薪酬不平等之间的非线性联系。
Demography. 2021 Apr 1;58(2):527-550. doi: 10.1215/00703370-8996374.
5
Economic Resources, Cultural Matching, and the Rural-Urban Boundary in China's Marriage Market.经济资源、文化匹配与中国婚姻市场中的城乡边界
J Marriage Fam. 2019 Jun;81(3):567-583. doi: 10.1111/jomf.12559. Epub 2019 Mar 1.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 May 13;111(19):6928-33. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1403158111. Epub 2014 Apr 28.
4
Marital age homogamy in China: a reversal of trend in the reform era?中国的婚姻年龄同质婚:改革时代的趋势逆转?
Soc Sci Res. 2014 Mar;44:141-57. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2013.11.005. Epub 2013 Dec 1.
5
Surplus Chinese Men: Demographic Determinants of the Sex Ratio at Marriageable Ages in China.中国男性过剩:中国适婚年龄性别比的人口学决定因素
Popul Dev Rev. 2013 Jun 1;39(2). doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2013.00589.x.
6
Social origins, hukou conversion, and the wellbeing of urban residents in contemporary China.社会出身、户口转换与当代中国城市居民的幸福感。
Soc Sci Res. 2013 Jan;42(1):71-89. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2012.08.004. Epub 2012 Aug 23.
7
I wouldn't, but you can: Attitudes toward interracial relationships.我不会,但你可以:对异族恋的态度。
Soc Sci Res. 2012 Mar;41(2):343-58. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2011.11.007. Epub 2011 Nov 18.
8
The proximate determinants of educational homogamy: the effects of first marriage, marital dissolution, remarriage, and educational upgrading.教育同婚的近期决定因素:初婚、婚姻解体、再婚和教育升级的影响。
Demography. 2012 May;49(2):629-50. doi: 10.1007/s13524-012-0093-0.
9
Social Stigma, Social Capital Reconstruction and Rural Migrants in Urban China: A Population Health Perspective.社会耻辱感、社会资本重建与中国城市中的农村移民:人口健康视角
Hum Organ. 2011 Jan;70(1):22-32. doi: 10.17730/humo.70.1.k76047734m703500.
10
Educational assortative mating and economic inequality: a comparative analysis of three Latin American countries.教育性择偶与经济不平等:三个拉丁美洲国家的比较分析
Demography. 2010 May;47(2):481-502. doi: 10.1353/dem.0.0109.