• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Access to systemic anti-cancer therapies for women with secondary breast cancer-protocol for a mixed methods systematic review.继发性乳腺癌女性获得全身抗癌治疗的情况——一项混合方法系统评价的方案
Syst Rev. 2021 Jul 23;10(1):209. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01761-y.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
4
Geographic and sociodemographic access to systemic anticancer therapies for secondary breast cancer: a systematic review.继发性乳腺癌系统性抗癌治疗的地理和社会人口学可及性:系统评价。
Syst Rev. 2024 Jan 18;13(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s13643-023-02382-3.
5
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
6
Evidence of promoting prevention and the early detection of breast cancer among women, a hospital-based education and screening interventions in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review protocol.促进女性乳腺癌预防和早期发现的证据:中低收入国家基于医院的教育和筛查干预措施:系统评价方案。
Syst Rev. 2018 Dec 14;7(1):234. doi: 10.1186/s13643-018-0889-0.
7
Non-pharmacological sleep interventions for pediatric cancer patients and survivors: a systematic review protocol.儿科癌症患者和幸存者的非药物睡眠干预措施:系统评价方案。
Syst Rev. 2021 Jun 4;10(1):166. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01724-3.
8
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.促进和支持社区中患有慢性身体疾病的成年人进行自我管理:对医患互动的有效性和意义的系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001.
9
Protocol for a systematic review and thematic synthesis of patient experiences of central venous access devices in anti-cancer treatment.针对癌症治疗中中心静脉通路装置患者体验的系统评价和主题综合议定书。
Syst Rev. 2018 Apr 18;7(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s13643-018-0721-x.
10
Factors that impact on the use of mechanical ventilation weaning protocols in critically ill adults and children: a qualitative evidence-synthesis.影响重症成人和儿童机械通气撤机方案使用的因素:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Oct 4;10(10):CD011812. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011812.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Geographic and sociodemographic access to systemic anticancer therapies for secondary breast cancer: a systematic review.继发性乳腺癌系统性抗癌治疗的地理和社会人口学可及性:系统评价。
Syst Rev. 2024 Jan 18;13(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s13643-023-02382-3.
2
Authors' Reply to: Clarity on the Type of Review. Comment on "Value Cocreation in Health Care: Systematic Review".作者对《关于综述类型的澄清。对“医疗保健中的价值共创:系统综述”的评论》的回复
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Jul 11;24(7):e39397. doi: 10.2196/39397.

本文引用的文献

1
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
2
Global analysis of advanced/metastatic breast cancer: Decade report (2005-2015).全球晚期/转移性乳腺癌分析:十年报告(2005-2015 年)。
Breast. 2018 Jun;39:131-138. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2018.03.002. Epub 2018 Apr 19.
3
Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement.系统评价与Meta分析方案的首选报告项目(PRISMA-P)2015声明。
Syst Rev. 2015 Jan 1;4(1):1. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-4-1.
4
Patient-centred access to health care: conceptualising access at the interface of health systems and populations.以患者为中心的医疗保健获取途径:在卫生系统和人群的交叉点上构想获取途径。
Int J Equity Health. 2013 Mar 11;12:18. doi: 10.1186/1475-9276-12-18.
5
Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews.系统评价中定性研究的主题综合方法。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2008 Jul 10;8:45. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-8-45.
6
The concept of access: definition and relationship to consumer satisfaction.可及性概念:定义及其与消费者满意度的关系
Med Care. 1981 Feb;19(2):127-40. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198102000-00001.

继发性乳腺癌女性获得全身抗癌治疗的情况——一项混合方法系统评价的方案

Access to systemic anti-cancer therapies for women with secondary breast cancer-protocol for a mixed methods systematic review.

作者信息

Pearson Sally Anne, Taylor Sally, Marsden Antonia, Yorke Janelle

机构信息

Division of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, University of Manchester, Oxford Rd, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.

Christie Patient Centred Research, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, 550 Wilmslow Road, Manchester, M20 4BX, UK.

出版信息

Syst Rev. 2021 Jul 23;10(1):209. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01761-y.

DOI:10.1186/s13643-021-01761-y
PMID:34294151
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8299679/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

It is well recognised that access and receipt of appropriate guideline recommended treatment with systemic anti-cancer therapies for secondary breast cancer is a key determinant in overall survival. Where there is disparity in access this may result in unwarranted variation and disparity in outcomes. Individual, clinical and wider contextual factors have been associated with these disparities, however this remains poorly understood for women with secondary breast cancer. The purpose of the review is to examine individual, clinical and contextual factors which influence access to evidence-based systemic anti-cancer therapies for women with secondary breast cancer. This will include barriers and facilitators for access and receipt of treatment and an exploration of women and clinicians experience and perspectives on access.

METHODS

A mixed methods approach with a segregated design will be used to examine and explore factors which influence access to systemic anti-cancer therapies for women with secondary breast cancer. Electronic databases to be searched from January 2000 onwards will be EBSCO CINAHL Plus, Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid EMBASE, PsychINFO and the Cochrane Library and JBI database. This will include NHS Evidence which will be searched for unpublished studies and gray literature. Title and abstract citations and full-text articles will be screened by the author and second reviewer. Data will be extracted by the author and validated by the second reviewer. An overarching synthesis will be produced which brings together quantitative and qualitative findings. Methodological quality and risk of bias will be assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool.

DISCUSSION

Understanding individual, clinical and wider contextual factors associated with access and receipt of systemic anti-cancer therapies for secondary breast cancer is a complex phenomenon. These will be examined to determine any association with access. Review findings will be used to guide future research in this area and the development of an evidence-based service level intervention designed to address unwarranted variation in access based upon the Medical Research Council (MRC) approach to the development, implementation and evaluation of complex interventions.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

The review protocol has been registered in PROSPERO CRD42020196490 .

摘要

背景

众所周知,获得并接受针对继发性乳腺癌的系统抗癌疗法的适当指南推荐治疗是总体生存的关键决定因素。在获得治疗方面存在差异的情况下,这可能导致结果出现不必要的差异。个体、临床和更广泛的背景因素与这些差异有关,然而对于继发性乳腺癌女性患者,这一点仍了解甚少。本综述的目的是研究影响继发性乳腺癌女性患者获得循证系统抗癌疗法的个体、临床和背景因素。这将包括获得和接受治疗的障碍与促进因素,并探索女性患者和临床医生在获得治疗方面的经历与观点。

方法

将采用一种具有分离设计的混合方法来研究和探索影响继发性乳腺癌女性患者获得系统抗癌疗法的因素。从2000年1月起将检索的电子数据库包括EBSCO CINAHL Plus、Ovid MEDLINE、Ovid EMBASE、PsychINFO、Cochrane图书馆和JBI数据库。这将包括NHS Evidence,将检索其中的未发表研究和灰色文献。标题和摘要引文以及全文文章将由作者和第二位审阅者进行筛选。数据将由作者提取并由第二位审阅者进行验证。将进行一项总体综合分析,汇集定量和定性研究结果。将使用混合方法评估工具评估方法学质量和偏倚风险。

讨论

了解与继发性乳腺癌系统抗癌疗法的获得和接受相关的个体、临床和更广泛的背景因素是一个复杂的现象。将对这些因素进行研究以确定与获得治疗之间的任何关联。综述结果将用于指导该领域的未来研究以及基于医学研究理事会(MRC)开发、实施和评估复杂干预措施的方法设计循证服务水平干预措施,以解决获得治疗方面不必要的差异。

系统综述注册

该综述方案已在PROSPERO注册,注册号为CRD42020196490 。