Matchin William, Wood Emily
Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA.
Cereb Cortex Commun. 2020 Jul 1;1(1):tgaa029. doi: 10.1093/texcom/tgaa029. eCollection 2020.
Matchin and Hickok (2020) proposed that the left posterior inferior frontal gyrus (PIFG) and the left posterior temporal lobe (PTL) both play a role in syntactic processing, broadly construed, attributing distinct functions to these regions with respect to production and perception. Consistent with this hypothesis, functional dissociations between these regions have been demonstrated with respect to lesion-symptom mapping in aphasia. However, neuroimaging studies of syntactic comprehension typically show similar activations in these regions. In order to identify whether these regions show distinct activation patterns with respect to syntactic perception and production, we performed an fMRI study contrasting the subvocal articulation and perception of structured jabberwocky phrases (syntactic), sequences of real words (lexical), and sequences of pseudowords (phonological). We defined two sets of language-selective regions of interest (ROIs) in individual subjects for the PIFG and the PTL using the contrasts [syntactic > lexical] and [syntactic > phonological]. We found robust significant interactions of comprehension and production between these 2 regions at the syntactic level, for both sets of language-selective ROIs. This suggests a core difference in the function of these regions with respect to production and perception, consistent with the lesion literature.
马钦和希科克(2020年)提出,左后下额回(PIFG)和左后颞叶(PTL)在广义的句法处理中均发挥作用,认为这些区域在产出和感知方面具有不同功能。与该假设一致,在失语症的损伤-症状映射方面,已证实这些区域之间存在功能分离。然而,句法理解的神经影像学研究通常显示这些区域有相似的激活情况。为了确定这些区域在句法感知和产出方面是否呈现出不同的激活模式,我们进行了一项功能磁共振成像(fMRI)研究,对比默读结构化的 nonsense 短语语句(句法)、实词序列(词汇)和假词序列(语音)的发音及感知。我们使用对比 [句法 > 词汇] 和 [句法 > 语音],在个体受试者中为PIFG和PTL定义了两组语言选择性感兴趣区域(ROIs)。对于两组语言选择性ROIs,我们发现在句法层面这两个区域在理解和产出方面存在强烈且显著的交互作用。这表明这些区域在产出和感知功能方面存在核心差异,与损伤文献一致。