• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

后下额回和颞叶后部的句法敏感区域在语言产出和语言感知过程中被差异性激活。

Syntax-Sensitive Regions of the Posterior Inferior Frontal Gyrus and the Posterior Temporal Lobe Are Differentially Recruited by Production and Perception.

作者信息

Matchin William, Wood Emily

机构信息

Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA.

出版信息

Cereb Cortex Commun. 2020 Jul 1;1(1):tgaa029. doi: 10.1093/texcom/tgaa029. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.1093/texcom/tgaa029
PMID:34296103
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8152856/
Abstract

Matchin and Hickok (2020) proposed that the left posterior inferior frontal gyrus (PIFG) and the left posterior temporal lobe (PTL) both play a role in syntactic processing, broadly construed, attributing distinct functions to these regions with respect to production and perception. Consistent with this hypothesis, functional dissociations between these regions have been demonstrated with respect to lesion-symptom mapping in aphasia. However, neuroimaging studies of syntactic comprehension typically show similar activations in these regions. In order to identify whether these regions show distinct activation patterns with respect to syntactic perception and production, we performed an fMRI study contrasting the subvocal articulation and perception of structured jabberwocky phrases (syntactic), sequences of real words (lexical), and sequences of pseudowords (phonological). We defined two sets of language-selective regions of interest (ROIs) in individual subjects for the PIFG and the PTL using the contrasts [syntactic > lexical] and [syntactic > phonological]. We found robust significant interactions of comprehension and production between these 2 regions at the syntactic level, for both sets of language-selective ROIs. This suggests a core difference in the function of these regions with respect to production and perception, consistent with the lesion literature.

摘要

马钦和希科克(2020年)提出,左后下额回(PIFG)和左后颞叶(PTL)在广义的句法处理中均发挥作用,认为这些区域在产出和感知方面具有不同功能。与该假设一致,在失语症的损伤-症状映射方面,已证实这些区域之间存在功能分离。然而,句法理解的神经影像学研究通常显示这些区域有相似的激活情况。为了确定这些区域在句法感知和产出方面是否呈现出不同的激活模式,我们进行了一项功能磁共振成像(fMRI)研究,对比默读结构化的 nonsense 短语语句(句法)、实词序列(词汇)和假词序列(语音)的发音及感知。我们使用对比 [句法 > 词汇] 和 [句法 > 语音],在个体受试者中为PIFG和PTL定义了两组语言选择性感兴趣区域(ROIs)。对于两组语言选择性ROIs,我们发现在句法层面这两个区域在理解和产出方面存在强烈且显著的交互作用。这表明这些区域在产出和感知功能方面存在核心差异,与损伤文献一致。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f86/8152856/beccd8dafbc2/tgaa029f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f86/8152856/979e18b7eb21/tgaa029f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f86/8152856/796a2f5ac40a/tgaa029f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f86/8152856/ab5483620ec8/tgaa029f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f86/8152856/d1702ae4fcdb/tgaa029f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f86/8152856/beccd8dafbc2/tgaa029f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f86/8152856/979e18b7eb21/tgaa029f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f86/8152856/796a2f5ac40a/tgaa029f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f86/8152856/ab5483620ec8/tgaa029f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f86/8152856/d1702ae4fcdb/tgaa029f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f86/8152856/beccd8dafbc2/tgaa029f5.jpg

相似文献

1
Syntax-Sensitive Regions of the Posterior Inferior Frontal Gyrus and the Posterior Temporal Lobe Are Differentially Recruited by Production and Perception.后下额回和颞叶后部的句法敏感区域在语言产出和语言感知过程中被差异性激活。
Cereb Cortex Commun. 2020 Jul 1;1(1):tgaa029. doi: 10.1093/texcom/tgaa029. eCollection 2020.
2
The role of the IFG and pSTS in syntactic prediction: Evidence from a parametric study of hierarchical structure in fMRI.中间前回和颞上沟后部在句法预测中的作用:来自功能磁共振成像中层次结构参数研究的证据。
Cortex. 2017 Mar;88:106-123. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2016.12.010. Epub 2016 Dec 18.
3
The Cortical Organization of Syntax.句法的皮层组织
Cereb Cortex. 2020 Mar 14;30(3):1481-1498. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhz180.
4
What role does the anterior temporal lobe play in sentence-level processing? Neural correlates of syntactic processing in semantic variant primary progressive aphasia.前部颞叶在句子层面的处理中扮演什么角色?语义变异原发性进行性失语症中句法处理的神经相关物。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2014 May;26(5):970-85. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00550. Epub 2013 Dec 17.
5
Left inferior frontal cortex and syntax: function, structure and behaviour in patients with left hemisphere damage.左侧额下回与句法:左侧大脑半球损伤患者的功能、结构和行为。
Brain. 2011 Feb;134(Pt 2):415-31. doi: 10.1093/brain/awq369.
6
The role of left temporo-parietal and inferior frontal cortex in comprehending syntactically complex sentences: A brain stimulation study.左颞顶叶和额下回皮质在理解句法复杂句子中的作用:一项脑刺激研究。
Neuropsychologia. 2023 Feb 10;180:108465. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2022.108465. Epub 2022 Dec 28.
7
Grammatical Parallelism in Aphasia: A Lesion-Symptom Mapping Study.失语症中的语法平行性:一项病灶-症状映射研究。
Neurobiol Lang (Camb). 2023 Oct 31;4(4):550-574. doi: 10.1162/nol_a_00117. eCollection 2023.
8
Differential activity in left inferior frontal gyrus for pseudowords and real words: an event-related fMRI study on auditory lexical decision.左侧额下回对假词和真词的不同激活:一项关于听觉词汇判断的事件相关功能磁共振成像研究
Hum Brain Mapp. 2005 Jun;25(2):212-21. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20105.
9
Anterior and Posterior Left Inferior Frontal Gyrus Contribute to the Implementation of Grammatical Determiners During Language Production.左额下回前部和后部在语言产生过程中对语法限定词的运用有贡献。
Front Psychol. 2020 Apr 27;11:685. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00685. eCollection 2020.
10
The posterior middle temporal gyrus serves as a hub in syntactic comprehension: A model on the syntactic neural network.后颞中回作为句法理解的枢纽:句法神经网络模型。
Brain Lang. 2022 Sep;232:105162. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2022.105162. Epub 2022 Jul 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Tracking neural correlates of contextualized meanings with representational similarity analysis.用表征相似性分析追踪情境化意义的神经关联。
J Neurosci. 2025 Mar 27;45(19). doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0409-24.2025.
2
Neural encoding of semantic structures during sentence production.句子生成过程中语义结构的神经编码。
Cereb Cortex. 2024 Dec 3;34(12). doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhae482.
3
Neuroanatomical correlates of language impairment in non-fluent variant of primary progressive aphasia.原发性进行性失语非流利型语言障碍的神经解剖学关联

本文引用的文献

1
Agrammatism and Paragrammatism: A Cortical Double Dissociation Revealed by Lesion-Symptom Mapping.语法缺失与错语症:通过病损-症状映射揭示的皮质双重分离
Neurobiol Lang (Camb). 2020;1(2):208-225. doi: 10.1162/nol_a_00010. Epub 2020 Jun 1.
2
Broca's Area Is Not a Natural Kind.布罗卡区不是自然种类。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2020 Apr;24(4):270-284. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2020.01.001. Epub 2020 Feb 20.
3
Neural basis of basic composition: what we have learned from the red-boat studies and their extensions.基本构成的神经基础:从红船研究及其扩展中我们学到了什么。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2024 Dec 4;18:1486809. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2024.1486809. eCollection 2024.
4
Connectivity of Fronto-Temporal Regions in Syntactic Structure Building During Speaking and Listening.口语和听力过程中句法结构构建时额颞叶区域的连通性
Neurobiol Lang (Camb). 2024 Oct 8;5(4):922-941. doi: 10.1162/nol_a_00154. eCollection 2024.
5
Conversational production and comprehension: fMRI-evidence reminiscent of but deviant from the classical Broca-Wernicke model.会话产生和理解:fMRI 证据既令人想起但又不同于经典的布洛卡-韦尼克模型。
Cereb Cortex. 2024 Mar 1;34(3). doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhae073.
6
Diverging neural dynamics for syntactic structure building in naturalistic speaking and listening.自然语言听说中句法结构构建的神经动力学差异。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Mar 12;121(11):e2310766121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2310766121. Epub 2024 Mar 5.
7
Lesion-symptom Mapping of Acceptability Judgments in Chronic Poststroke Aphasia Reveals the Neurobiological Underpinnings of Receptive Syntax.慢性卒中后失语症可接受性判断的病灶-症状映射揭示了接受性句法的神经生物学基础。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2024 Jun 1;36(6):1141-1155. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_02134.
8
Grammatical Parallelism in Aphasia: A Lesion-Symptom Mapping Study.失语症中的语法平行性:一项病灶-症状映射研究。
Neurobiol Lang (Camb). 2023 Oct 31;4(4):550-574. doi: 10.1162/nol_a_00117. eCollection 2023.
9
Supramodal Sentence Processing in the Human Brain: fMRI Evidence for the Influence of Syntactic Complexity in More Than 200 Participants.人类大脑中的跨模态句子处理:超过200名参与者的功能磁共振成像证据表明句法复杂性的影响
Neurobiol Lang (Camb). 2022 Sep 29;3(4):575-598. doi: 10.1162/nol_a_00076. eCollection 2022.
10
Precision fMRI reveals that the language-selective network supports both phrase-structure building and lexical access during language production.精确 fMRI 揭示语言选择网络在语言产生过程中既支持句法结构的构建,也支持词汇的获取。
Cereb Cortex. 2023 Apr 4;33(8):4384-4404. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhac350.
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2020 Feb 3;375(1791):20190299. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2019.0299. Epub 2019 Dec 16.
4
The Cortical Organization of Syntax.句法的皮层组织
Cereb Cortex. 2020 Mar 14;30(3):1481-1498. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhz180.
5
Same words, different structures: An fMRI investigation of argument relations and the angular gyrus.相同的词,不同的结构:关于论元关系和角回的 fMRI 研究。
Neuropsychologia. 2019 Mar 4;125:116-128. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.01.019. Epub 2019 Feb 5.
6
Proactive Sensing of Periodic and Aperiodic Auditory Patterns.周期性和非周期性听觉模式的主动感知。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2018 Oct;22(10):870-882. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2018.08.003.
7
Convergence of spoken and written language processing in the superior temporal sulcus.颞上回中口语和书面语处理的融合。
Neuroimage. 2018 May 1;171:62-74. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.12.068. Epub 2017 Dec 23.
8
The Neurobiology of Agrammatic Sentence Comprehension: A Lesion Study.《语法错误句子理解的神经生物学:病变研究》。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2018 Feb;30(2):234-255. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01200. Epub 2017 Oct 24.
9
A neuronal retuning hypothesis of sentence-specificity in Broca's area.Broca 区句子特异性的神经元重调假说。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Oct;25(5):1682-1694. doi: 10.3758/s13423-017-1377-6.
10
Reviewing the functional basis of the syntactic Merge mechanism for language: A coordinate-based activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis.回顾语言句法合并机制的功能基础:基于坐标的激活似然估计元分析。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2017 Sep;80:646-656. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.06.011. Epub 2017 Jul 23.