• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中国企业平均燃料消耗量与新能源汽车双积分政策对乘用车燃料消耗量影响分析。

Effect of Chinese Corporate Average Fuel Consumption and New Energy Vehicle Dual-Credit Regulation on Passenger Cars Average Fuel Consumption Analysis.

机构信息

State Key Laboratory of Automotive Safety and Energy, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China.

Tsinghua Automotive Strategy Research Institute, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 6;18(14):7218. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18147218.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph18147218
PMID:34299669
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8306271/
Abstract

The large sales volume and a great number of passenger car ownership in China have brought a series of environmental and energy problems. In response to these problems, Corporate Average Fuel Consumption and New Energy Vehicle Dual-credit Regulation has been put forward in China. However, it is found that although the purpose of the Dual-credit Regulation is controlling the fuel consumption and promoting the development of the energy vehicle market, the fuel consumption restriction for fossil-fueled passenger cars is relaxed compared to CAFC (Corporate Average Fuel Consumption) regulation alone. Moreover, this effect of relaxation is more obvious when the market share of new energy vehicles increases. To quantitatively estimate the relaxation effect of the fuel consumption restriction, a method of quantifying the relaxation effect is designed, and three different scenarios of new energy vehicle market development have been presumed in this paper. It is found that there are three main factors related to new energy vehicles that cause the relaxation of fuel consumption restriction, and the effect might become obvious and severe after 2025 if the market share of new energy vehicles develops very rapidly. These results may affect the development of the automotive industry and needed to be concerned.

摘要

中国庞大的汽车销售量和大量的汽车保有量带来了一系列环境和能源问题。针对这些问题,中国提出了企业平均燃料消耗量和新能源汽车双积分政策。然而,研究发现,尽管双积分政策的目的是控制油耗和促进新能源汽车市场的发展,但与单独的企业平均燃料消耗量(CAFC)法规相比,对燃油乘用车的油耗限制有所放宽。此外,当新能源汽车市场份额增加时,这种放宽效果更为明显。为了定量估计油耗限制的放宽效果,设计了一种量化放宽效果的方法,并在本文中假设了新能源汽车市场发展的三种不同情景。研究结果表明,有三个与新能源汽车相关的主要因素导致了油耗限制的放宽,如果新能源汽车市场份额发展非常迅速,这种放宽效果可能在 2025 年后变得明显和严重。这些结果可能会影响汽车行业的发展,需要引起关注。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8998/8306271/e62526947a87/ijerph-18-07218-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8998/8306271/992018148eb4/ijerph-18-07218-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8998/8306271/8d577cc98374/ijerph-18-07218-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8998/8306271/b50217228dab/ijerph-18-07218-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8998/8306271/b49f9ad8b66b/ijerph-18-07218-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8998/8306271/71b615cd48fa/ijerph-18-07218-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8998/8306271/d55316299a13/ijerph-18-07218-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8998/8306271/e62526947a87/ijerph-18-07218-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8998/8306271/992018148eb4/ijerph-18-07218-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8998/8306271/8d577cc98374/ijerph-18-07218-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8998/8306271/b50217228dab/ijerph-18-07218-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8998/8306271/b49f9ad8b66b/ijerph-18-07218-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8998/8306271/71b615cd48fa/ijerph-18-07218-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8998/8306271/d55316299a13/ijerph-18-07218-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8998/8306271/e62526947a87/ijerph-18-07218-g007.jpg

相似文献

1
Effect of Chinese Corporate Average Fuel Consumption and New Energy Vehicle Dual-Credit Regulation on Passenger Cars Average Fuel Consumption Analysis.中国企业平均燃料消耗量与新能源汽车双积分政策对乘用车燃料消耗量影响分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 6;18(14):7218. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18147218.
2
Impacts of the New Worldwide Light-Duty Test Procedure on Technology Effectiveness and China's Passenger Vehicle Fuel Consumption Regulations.《新全球轻型车测试规程对技术有效性的影响及中国乘用车燃料消耗量法规》。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 19;18(6):3199. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18063199.
3
Variability of fuel consumption and CO emissions of a gasoline passenger car under multiple in-laboratory and on-road testing conditions.多种实验室和道路测试条件下,一辆汽油乘用车的燃料消耗和 CO 排放的变化性。
J Environ Sci (China). 2023 Mar;125:266-276. doi: 10.1016/j.jes.2021.12.042. Epub 2022 Jan 4.
4
Alternative Fuel Vehicle Adoption Increases Fleet Gasoline Consumption and Greenhouse Gas Emissions under United States Corporate Average Fuel Economy Policy and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Standards.在美国企业平均燃油经济性政策和温室气体排放标准下,替代燃料汽车的采用增加了车队的汽油消耗和温室气体排放。
Environ Sci Technol. 2016 Mar 1;50(5):2165-74. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.5b02842. Epub 2016 Feb 11.
5
An investigation on well-to-wheel emissions of passenger cars in Turkey.土耳其乘用车的全生命周期排放研究。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Mar;29(11):16692-16715. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-16738-6. Epub 2021 Oct 16.
6
Life cycle water footprint of electric and internal combustion engine vehicles in China.中国电动汽车和内燃机汽车的生命周期水足迹。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Jul;30(33):80442-80461. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-28002-0. Epub 2023 Jun 10.
7
Assessment of ethanol blended fuels for gasoline vehicles in China: Fuel economy, regulated gaseous pollutants and particulate matter.中国汽油车掺烧乙醇燃料的评估:燃料经济性、气态污染物和颗粒物排放。
Environ Pollut. 2019 Oct;253:731-740. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2019.07.045. Epub 2019 Jul 12.
8
Predicting vehicle fuel consumption patterns using floating vehicle data.利用浮动车辆数据预测车辆油耗模式。
J Environ Sci (China). 2017 Sep;59:24-29. doi: 10.1016/j.jes.2017.03.008. Epub 2017 Mar 18.
9
Electric vehicles in China: emissions and health impacts.中国的电动汽车:排放物与健康影响。
Environ Sci Technol. 2012 Feb 21;46(4):2018-24. doi: 10.1021/es202347q. Epub 2012 Feb 1.
10
Underestimated Ammonia Emissions from Road Vehicles.低估的道路车辆氨排放。
Environ Sci Technol. 2020 Dec 15;54(24):15689-15697. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.0c05839. Epub 2020 Dec 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Technology innovation and environmental outcomes of road transportation policy instruments.道路运输政策工具的技术创新与环境成果。
Nat Commun. 2025 May 14;16(1):4467. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-59111-8.