• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

得失?生态补偿政策的环境和经济影响的定量评估。

Gains or losses? A quantitative estimation of environmental and economic effects of an ecological compensation policy.

机构信息

College of Land Science and Technology, China Agriculture University, Beijing, 100193, China.

Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China.

出版信息

Ecol Appl. 2021 Jul;31(5):e02341. doi: 10.1002/eap.2341. Epub 2021 May 25.

DOI:10.1002/eap.2341
PMID:33817892
Abstract

Ecological compensation is an innovative and effective tool to explore the coordinated development of socioeconomic prosperity and ecological protection, especially for a watershed crossing different regions. It converts the externalities of ecosystem services into practical financial incentives for local stakeholders. This empirical study applies a quantitative policy evaluation approach to evaluate the environmental and economic effects of an ecological compensation policy, using the paddy land-to-dry land (PLDL) program implemented in China's Miyun Reservoir watershed as an example. The study is based on responses to a 2017 questionnaire regarding agricultural production inputs and outputs administered to 269 households in Hebei Province, where the PLDL program has been operational for over 10 yr. The results show that the program has reduced nitrogen usage by 24% on average in 2017 and decreased the total nitrogen emission load by 16.98 tons for the entire case area, which accounts for approximately 18.6% of the total nitrogen load reduction of the Miyun Reservoir basin. However, the upstream households involved in this program have experienced agricultural income losses higher than that allowed for by the current compensation criterion. Therefore, this paper discusses the factors that should be considered in the process of determining ecological compensation criteria. In particular, the paper proposes a differential compensation scheme based on the environmental effect at the individual level to avoid a standard payment for all households irrespective of their different contributions. This differential compensation payment scheme facilitates the fair treatment of environmental contributors and maximizes environmental benefits through an equitable allocation of limited ecological compensation funds. This study serves as a theoretical and practical reference for further improvement of the current ecological compensation policy in China. The study also sheds light on practices for estimating ecological compensation criteria and formulating ecological compensation policies for other regions or countries in the future.

摘要

生态补偿是探索经济社会繁荣与生态保护协调发展的一种创新而有效的手段,尤其对于跨区域的流域而言。它将生态系统服务的外部性转化为当地利益相关者的实际经济激励。本实证研究采用定量政策评估方法,以中国密云水库流域的耕地-非耕地(PLDL)项目为例,评估了生态补偿政策的环境和经济影响。该研究基于对河北省 269 户农户农业生产投入和产出的 2017 年问卷调查的回应,PLDL 项目在该地区已实施超过 10 年。研究结果表明,该项目在 2017 年平均减少了 24%的氮肥使用量,使整个案例区的总氮排放量减少了 16.98 吨,约占密云水库流域总氮负荷削减量的 18.6%。然而,参与该项目的上游农户的农业收入损失高于现行补偿标准允许的水平。因此,本文讨论了在确定生态补偿标准的过程中应考虑的因素。特别是,本文提出了一种基于个体层面环境效果的差异化补偿方案,以避免对所有农户按照统一标准进行支付,而不论其对环境的贡献程度如何。这种差异化补偿支付方案有助于公平对待环境贡献者,并通过公平分配有限的生态补偿资金来实现环境效益的最大化。本研究为进一步完善中国现行生态补偿政策提供了理论和实践参考。同时,该研究也为未来其他地区或国家估算生态补偿标准和制定生态补偿政策提供了借鉴。

相似文献

1
Gains or losses? A quantitative estimation of environmental and economic effects of an ecological compensation policy.得失?生态补偿政策的环境和经济影响的定量评估。
Ecol Appl. 2021 Jul;31(5):e02341. doi: 10.1002/eap.2341. Epub 2021 May 25.
2
Quantitative Assessment of Horizontal Ecological Compensation for Cultivated Land Based on an Improved Ecological Footprint Model: A Case Study of Jiangxi Province, China.基于改进生态足迹模型的耕地横向生态补偿定量评估——以江西省为例。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Mar 6;20(5):4618. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20054618.
3
Households' Willingness to Accept Improved Ecosystem Services and Influencing Factors: Application of Contingent Valuation Method in Bashang Plateau, Hebei Province, China.农户对改善生态系统服务的支付意愿及其影响因素——以河北省坝上高原为例的条件价值评估法应用
J Environ Manage. 2020 Feb 1;255:109925. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109925. Epub 2019 Dec 3.
4
Integrating ecosystem services trade-offs with paddy land-to-dry land decisions: A scenario approach in Erhai Lake Basin, southwest China.将生态系统服务权衡与稻田到旱地决策相结合:以中国西南洱海流域为例的情景方法。
Sci Total Environ. 2018 Jun 1;625:849-860. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.340. Epub 2018 Jan 5.
5
Benefits, costs, and livelihood implications of a regional payment for ecosystem service program.区域生态系统服务付费项目的效益、成本和生计影响。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Oct 8;110(41):16681-6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1312324110. Epub 2013 Sep 3.
6
Rural Household Preferences for Active Participation in "Payment for Ecosystem Service" Programs: A Case in the Miyun Reservoir Catchment, China.农村家庭积极参与“生态系统服务付费”项目的偏好:以中国密云水库集水区为例
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 3;12(1):e0169483. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169483. eCollection 2017.
7
Forest ecosystem services and eco-compensation mechanisms in China.中国森林生态系统服务与生态补偿机制。
Environ Manage. 2011 Dec;48(6):1079-85. doi: 10.1007/s00267-011-9742-0. Epub 2011 Sep 1.
8
Research on the coordinated development of ecosystem services and well-being in agricultural and pastoral areas.农牧业区生态系统服务与福祉协同发展研究
J Environ Manage. 2022 Feb 15;304:114300. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.114300. Epub 2021 Dec 27.
9
Quantitative assessment of agricultural horizontal ecological compensation in China, from the perspective of virtual land and virtual water.基于虚拟土地和虚拟水视角的中国农业横向生态补偿定量评估
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Feb;30(9):22885-22899. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-23220-4. Epub 2022 Oct 29.
10
Changes in Ecosystem Services Value and Establishment of Watershed Ecological Compensation Standards.生态系统服务价值变化与流域生态补偿标准制定。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Aug 16;16(16):2951. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16162951.

引用本文的文献

1
A study of the evolutionary game of carbon offset involving tourism stakeholders under incentive and constraint mechanisms.激励与约束机制下旅游利益相关者参与碳抵消的进化博弈研究
Sci Rep. 2024 Jun 28;14(1):14935. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-65964-8.
2
Spatial effects of the agricultural ecosystem services based on environmental kuznets curve in Mengyin county, China.基于环境库兹涅茨曲线的中国蒙阴县农业生态系统服务空间效应
Heliyon. 2023 May 1;9(5):e15918. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15918. eCollection 2023 May.
3
Quantitative Evaluation of China's Ecological Protection Compensation Policy Based on PMC Index Model.
基于 PMC 指数模型的中国生态保护补偿政策定量评估。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 17;19(16):10227. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191610227.
4
Quantitative Evaluation of Waste Separation Management Policies in the Yangtze River Delta Based on the PMC Index Model.基于PMC指数模型的长江三角洲地区垃圾分类管理政策量化评估
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 23;19(7):3815. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19073815.
5
Optimal Allocation of Water Resources and Eco-Compensation Mechanism Model Based on the Interval-Fuzzy Two-Stage Stochastic Programming Method for Tingjiang River.基于区间模糊两阶段随机规划方法的汀江流域水资源优化配置与生态补偿机制模型
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 23;19(1):149. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19010149.
6
How Capital Endowment and Ecological Cognition Affect Environment-Friendly Technology Adoption: A Case of Apple Farmers of Shandong Province, China.资本禀赋与生态认知如何影响环保技术采用——以山东省苹果种植户为例。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 16;18(14):7571. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18147571.