Suppr超能文献

临床实践中哮喘控制分级的挑战。

The challenge of asthma control grading in clinical practice.

机构信息

Allergy Center, Department of Pediatric Science, Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genoa, Italy.

Health Science Department, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.

出版信息

Respir Investig. 2021 Sep;59(5):683-685. doi: 10.1016/j.resinv.2021.06.001. Epub 2021 Jul 21.

Abstract

Asthma is a chronic disease for which control is considered the management goal. However, the different methods to measure asthma control, including the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) criteria and Asthma Control Test (ACT), can produce conflicting results. This nationwide pediatric study compared both methods in 465 enrolled children (322 males, mean age 11.2 years). Lung function and symptom perception were also evaluated. The results showed fair concordance (k = 0.253) between GINA grading and childhood-ACT (C-ACT). Multivariate analysis revealed an association between the parents' perception of asthma and uncontrolled asthma (odds ratio [OR] = 1.52). These findings highlight the persisting puzzle of asthma control grading in primary care, which could confuse doctors. Therefore, asthma control assessment deserves adequate attention and requires substantial expertise in clinical practice.

摘要

哮喘是一种慢性病,控制被认为是管理目标。然而,不同的哮喘控制测量方法,包括全球哮喘倡议(GINA)标准和哮喘控制测试(ACT),可能会产生相互矛盾的结果。这项全国性儿科研究比较了这两种方法在 465 名入组儿童(322 名男性,平均年龄 11.2 岁)中的应用。还评估了肺功能和症状感知。结果显示,GINA 分级和儿童 ACT(C-ACT)之间具有良好的一致性(k=0.253)。多变量分析显示,父母对哮喘的认知与未控制的哮喘之间存在关联(比值比[OR] = 1.52)。这些发现突出了初级保健中哮喘控制分级的持续难题,这可能会使医生感到困惑。因此,哮喘控制评估值得充分关注,并需要在临床实践中具备专业知识。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验