Global Health and Development, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
Mwanza Intervention Trials Unit, National Institute for Medical Research Mwanza Research Centre, Mwanza, Tanzania.
BMJ Glob Health. 2021 Jul;6(7). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-004555.
Violence against women is a global public health concern; around a quarter of women will experience intimate partner physical or sexual violence during their lifetime. We assessed the impact of a gender transformative intervention for women designed to prevent intimate partner violence (IPV).
We conducted a cluster randomised controlled trial in Mwanza city, Tanzania, among women in newly formed neighbourhood groups to evaluate a 10-session participatory intervention that aims to empower women, prevent IPV and promote healthy relationships. Following a baseline interview, groups were randomly assigned (1:1 ratio) to the intervention or control arm. An intention-to-treat analysis was conducted to assess the impact of the intervention on the main outcomes, assessed 24 months postintervention. These included past-year physical IPV and sexual IPV (primary); past-year emotional abuse; and acceptability and tolerance of IPV.
Between September 2015 and February 2017, 1265 women were recruited in 66 neighbourhoods and randomly allocated to intervention (n=627 women in 33 neighbourhoods) or control (n=638 women in 33 neighbourhoods). Assessment of outcomes was completed for 551 (88%) intervention and 575 (90%) control women. Among intervention women, 113 (21%) reported physical IPV compared with 117 (20%) control women (adjusted OR (aOR) 0.98, 95% CI 0.72 to 1.33, p=0.892), and 109 (20%) intervention women reported sexual IPV compared with 121 (21%) control women (aOR 0.98, 95% CI 0.72 to 1.32, p=0.881). Intervention women reported less emotional abuse (aOR 0.74, 95% CI 0.56 to 0.98, p=0.035), and were less likely to express attitudes accepting of IPV (aOR 0.49, 95% CI 0.36 to 0.66, p<0.001), and beliefs that IPV is a private matter (aOR 0.54, 95% CI 0.38 to 0.78, p=0.001), or should be tolerated (aOR 0.48, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.66, p<0.001).
These results indicate that the intervention was effective in reducing emotional abuse and positively impacting attitudes and beliefs condoning IPV, but was not sufficient to reduce physical or sexual IPV.
NCT02592252.
针对妇女的暴力是全球公共卫生关注的问题;大约四分之一的妇女在其一生中会经历伴侣的身体或性暴力。我们评估了一项针对妇女的性别转换干预措施对预防亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)的影响。
我们在坦桑尼亚姆万扎市的新形成的社区小组中进行了一项集群随机对照试验,以评估旨在增强妇女权能、预防 IPV 和促进健康关系的 10 节参与式干预措施。在基线访谈后,将小组(1:1 比例)随机分配到干预组或对照组。采用意向治疗分析评估干预对主要结局的影响,干预后 24 个月进行评估。这些结局包括过去一年的身体 IPV 和性 IPV(主要结局);过去一年的情感虐待;以及对 IPV 的可接受性和容忍度。
2015 年 9 月至 2017 年 2 月,在 66 个社区中招募了 1265 名妇女,并随机分配到干预组(n=627 名妇女在 33 个社区)或对照组(n=638 名妇女在 33 个社区)。对 551 名(88%)干预组和 575 名(90%)对照组妇女进行了结局评估。在干预组中,有 113 名(21%)妇女报告了身体 IPV,而对照组有 117 名(20%)妇女(调整后的 OR(aOR)0.98,95%CI 0.72 至 1.33,p=0.892),109 名(20%)干预组妇女报告了性 IPV,而对照组有 121 名(21%)妇女(aOR 0.98,95%CI 0.72 至 1.32,p=0.881)。干预组妇女报告的情感虐待较少(aOR 0.74,95%CI 0.56 至 0.98,p=0.035),并且不太可能表达对 IPV 的可接受态度(aOR 0.49,95%CI 0.36 至 0.66,p<0.001),以及认为 IPV 是私人事务的信念(aOR 0.54,95%CI 0.38 至 0.78,p=0.001),或应该容忍(aOR 0.48,95%CI 0.34 至 0.66,p<0.001)。
这些结果表明,该干预措施在减少情感虐待和对 IPV 表示宽容的态度和信念方面有效,但不足以减少身体或性 IPV。
NCT02592252。