• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于检出淋巴结数的 II 期结肠癌分期可能优于目前的 TNM 分期,用于预后分层:日本结直肠癌术后随访研究组。

Stage II colon cancer staging using the number of retrieved lymph nodes may be superior to current TNM staging for prognosis stratification: the Japanese study group for postoperative follow-up of colorectal cancer.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Institute of Gastroenterology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, 8-1, Kawada-cho, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 162-8666, Japan.

Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, 1-5-45 Yushima, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8519, Japan.

出版信息

Int J Colorectal Dis. 2021 Oct;36(10):2205-2214. doi: 10.1007/s00384-021-03990-y. Epub 2021 Jul 24.

DOI:10.1007/s00384-021-03990-y
PMID:34302501
Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of the study was to compare staging of stage II colon cancer using the number of retrieved lymph nodes (RN) to current TNM staging for stratification of prognosis.

METHODS

The subjects were 6307 patients with stage II colon cancer who underwent curative resection at 24 Japanese institutions. The cutoff for the number of RN was established using Akaike information criterion (AIC) values for relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). Comparison of survival using TNM and T + RN (TRN) staging was performed using a Cox proportional hazards regression model.

RESULTS

AIC was lowest for 14 retrieved lymph nodes for RFS and OS. This number was used as the cutoff. In multivariate analysis, age (≥ 69), male gender, V1, CEA (> 5), pT (T4a, T4b), and RN-L were independent factors associated with RFS and OS. Six combinations of pT and RN categories were used to establish three subgroups: TRN stages IIA, IIB, and IIC. The 5-year RFS was 83.9%, 72.3%, and 71.8% in TNM stages IIA, IIB, and IIC; and 86.0%, 76.9%, and 60.3% in TRN stages IIA, IIB, and IIC. The 5-year OS was 90.0%, 81.3%, and 82.6% for the TNM stages; and 91.6%, 85.0%, and 71.9% for the TRN stages. The AIC for RFS was lower for TRN (22,318.2) than for TNM (22,390.6), and that for OS was also lower for TRN (16,285.3) than for TNM (16,355.1).

CONCLUSION

Stage II colon cancer staging using the number of retrieved lymph nodes may be superior to current TNM staging for prognosis stratification.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较使用检出淋巴结(RN)数量对 II 期结肠癌进行分期,以替代当前的 TNM 分期,从而对预后进行分层。

方法

本研究纳入了在日本 24 家医疗机构接受根治性切除术的 6307 例 II 期结肠癌患者。采用复发无进展生存(RFS)和总生存(OS)的赤池信息量准则(AIC)值来确定 RN 数量的截断值。采用 Cox 比例风险回归模型比较 TNM 分期和 T+RN(TRN)分期的生存情况。

结果

AIC 最低的是用于 RFS 和 OS 的 14 个检出的淋巴结。以此数量作为截断值。多变量分析显示,年龄(≥69 岁)、男性、V1、CEA(>5)、pT(T4a、T4b)和 RN-L 是与 RFS 和 OS 相关的独立因素。根据 pT 和 RN 分类的 6 种组合,建立了 3 个亚组:TRN 分期 IIA、IIB 和 IIC。TNM 分期 IIA、IIB 和 IIC 的 5 年 RFS 分别为 83.9%、72.3%和 71.8%,TRN 分期 IIA、IIB 和 IIC 的 5 年 RFS 分别为 86.0%、76.9%和 60.3%。TNM 分期的 5 年 OS 分别为 90.0%、81.3%和 82.6%,TRN 分期的 5 年 OS 分别为 91.6%、85.0%和 71.9%。RFS 的 AIC 对于 TRN(22318.2)来说低于 TNM(22390.6),OS 的 AIC 对于 TRN(16285.3)来说也低于 TNM(16355.1)。

结论

使用检出淋巴结数量对 II 期结肠癌进行分期可能优于当前的 TNM 分期,有助于对预后进行分层。

相似文献

1
Stage II colon cancer staging using the number of retrieved lymph nodes may be superior to current TNM staging for prognosis stratification: the Japanese study group for postoperative follow-up of colorectal cancer.基于检出淋巴结数的 II 期结肠癌分期可能优于目前的 TNM 分期,用于预后分层:日本结直肠癌术后随访研究组。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2021 Oct;36(10):2205-2214. doi: 10.1007/s00384-021-03990-y. Epub 2021 Jul 24.
2
New staging systems for left-sided colon cancer based on the number of retrieved and metastatic lymph nodes provide a more accurate prognosis.基于检出和转移的淋巴结数量的左半结肠癌新分期系统可提供更准确的预后评估。
Pathol Oncol Res. 2023 Feb 24;29:1610874. doi: 10.3389/pore.2023.1610874. eCollection 2023.
3
Superior prognosis stratification for stage III colon cancer using log odds of positive lymph nodes (LODDS) compared to TNM stage classification: the Japanese study group for postoperative follow-up of colorectal cancer.与TNM分期分类相比,使用阳性淋巴结对数比(LODDS)对III期结肠癌进行预后分层:日本结直肠癌术后随访研究组
Oncotarget. 2020 Aug 18;11(33):3144-3152. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.27692.
4
[Prognostic value and initial exploratory research on TNM staging method of tumor deposits in stage III colon cancer].[Ⅲ期结肠癌中肿瘤结节TNM分期方法的预后价值及初步探索性研究]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2019 Dec 25;22(12):1152-1158. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-0274.2019.12.010.
5
A new lymph node ratio-based staging system for rectosigmoid cancer: a retrospective study with external validation.一种基于新淋巴结比率的直肠乙状结肠癌分期系统:一项回顾性研究及外部验证。
Int J Surg. 2023 Oct 1;109(10):3087-3096. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000546.
6
Topographic lymph node staging system shows prognostic superiority compared to the 8th edition of AJCC TNM in gastric cancer. A western monocentric experience.胃癌的拓扑淋巴结分期系统优于第 8 版 AJCC TNM 分期系统,具有更好的预后预测价值。一项西方单中心经验。
Surg Oncol. 2020 Sep;34:223-233. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2020.04.022. Epub 2020 May 16.
7
[Evaluation of the value of 7th editions of UICC-AJCC esophageal and gastric cancer TNM staging systems for prognostic prediction of adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction (Siewert type II)].[UICC-AJCC第7版食管癌和胃癌TNM分期系统对食管胃交界腺癌(SiewertⅡ型)预后预测价值的评估]
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2014 Dec 23;36(12):916-21. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3766.2014.12.008.
8
Development and validation of a staging system for HPV-related oropharyngeal cancer by the International Collaboration on Oropharyngeal cancer Network for Staging (ICON-S): a multicentre cohort study.国际口咽癌协作网(ICON-S)制定和验证 HPV 相关口咽癌分期系统:一项多中心队列研究。
Lancet Oncol. 2016 Apr;17(4):440-451. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00560-4. Epub 2016 Feb 27.
9
[Effect of number of metastatic lymph nodes and metastatic lymph node ratio on the prognosis in patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction after curative resection].[根治性切除术后食管胃交界腺癌患者转移淋巴结数量及转移淋巴结比率对预后的影响]
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2014 Feb;36(2):141-6.
10
Number of negative lymph nodes with a positive impact on survival of stage III colon cancer; a retrospective observation study for right side and left side colon.影响 III 期结肠癌患者生存的阳性淋巴结数量;右半结肠和左半结肠的回顾性观察研究。
BMC Cancer. 2022 Jan 31;22(1):126. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-09154-z.

本文引用的文献

1
Superior prognosis stratification for stage III colon cancer using log odds of positive lymph nodes (LODDS) compared to TNM stage classification: the Japanese study group for postoperative follow-up of colorectal cancer.与TNM分期分类相比,使用阳性淋巴结对数比(LODDS)对III期结肠癌进行预后分层:日本结直肠癌术后随访研究组
Oncotarget. 2020 Aug 18;11(33):3144-3152. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.27692.
2
Examining the relationship between lymph node harvest and survival in patients undergoing colectomy for colon adenocarcinoma.检查接受结肠癌切除术的患者的淋巴结清扫与生存之间的关系。
Surgery. 2019 Oct;166(4):639-647. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2019.03.027. Epub 2019 Aug 7.
3
Population-based study to re-evaluate optimal lymph node yield in colonic cancer.
基于人群的研究以重新评估结肠癌的最佳淋巴结收获量。
Br J Surg. 2017 Jul;104(8):1087-1096. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10540. Epub 2017 May 24.
4
Impact of age on the prognostic value of number of lymph nodes retrieved in patients with stage II colorectal cancer.年龄对II期结直肠癌患者淋巴结清扫数量预后价值的影响。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2016 Jul;31(7):1307-13. doi: 10.1007/s00384-016-2602-x. Epub 2016 May 27.
5
Linking surgical specimen length and examined lymph nodes in colorectal cancer patients.结直肠癌患者手术标本长度与检查淋巴结的关联
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2016 Feb;42(2):260-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2015.11.017. Epub 2015 Dec 17.
6
Stage migration vs immunology: The lymph node count story in colon cancer.分期迁移与免疫学:结肠癌中的淋巴结计数情况
World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Nov 21;21(43):12218-33. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i43.12218.
7
Colorectal cancer and lymph nodes: the obsession with the number 12.结直肠癌与淋巴结:对数字12的执着
World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Feb 28;20(8):1951-60. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i8.1951.
8
Lymph node evaluation in stage IIA colorectal cancer and its impact on patient prognosis: a population-based study.ⅡA 期结直肠癌的淋巴结评估及其对患者预后的影响:一项基于人群的研究。
Acta Oncol. 2013 Nov;52(8):1682-90. doi: 10.3109/0284186X.2013.808376. Epub 2013 Jun 20.
9
ESMO Consensus Guidelines for management of patients with colon and rectal cancer. a personalized approach to clinical decision making.ESMO 结肠癌和直肠癌患者管理共识指南。 个体化临床决策方法。
Ann Oncol. 2012 Oct;23(10):2479-2516. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mds236.
10
The relationship of lymph node evaluation and colorectal cancer survival after curative resection: a multi-institutional study.淋巴结评估与结直肠癌根治性切除术后生存的关系:一项多机构研究。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2012 Jul;19(7):2169-77. doi: 10.1245/s10434-012-2223-8.