Sechi Elia, Flanagan Eoin P
Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.
Department of Medical, Surgical and Experimental Sciences, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy.
Front Neurol. 2021 Jul 7;12:673339. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.673339. eCollection 2021.
Antibody-mediated disorders of the central nervous system (CNS) are increasingly recognized as neurologic disorders that can be severe and even life-threatening but with the potential for reversibility with appropriate treatment. The expanding spectrum of newly identified autoantibodies targeting glial or neuronal (neural) antigens and associated clinical syndromes (ranging from autoimmune encephalitis to CNS demyelination) has increased diagnostic precision, and allowed critical reinterpretation of non-specific neurological syndromes historically associated with systemic disorders (e.g., Hashimoto encephalopathy). The intracellular vs. cell-surface or synaptic location of the different neural autoantibody targets often helps to predict the clinical characteristics, potential cancer association, and treatment response of the associated syndromes. In particular, autoantibodies targeting intracellular antigens (traditionally termed onconeural autoantibodies) are often associated with cancers, rarely respond well to immunosuppression and have a poor outcome, although exceptions exist. Detection of neural autoantibodies with accurate laboratory assays in patients with compatible clinical-MRI phenotypes allows a definite diagnosis of antibody-mediated CNS disorders, with important therapeutic and prognostic implications. Antibody-mediated CNS disorders are rare, and reliable autoantibody identification is highly dependent on the technique used for detection and pre-test probability. As a consequence, indiscriminate neural autoantibody testing among patients with more common neurologic disorders (e.g., epilepsy, dementia) will necessarily increase the risk of false positivity, so that recognition of high-risk clinical-MRI phenotypes is crucial. A number of emerging clinical settings have recently been recognized to favor development of CNS autoimmunity. These include antibody-mediated CNS disorders following herpes simplex virus encephalitis or occurring in a post-transplant setting, and neurological autoimmunity triggered by TNFα inhibitors or immune checkpoint inhibitors for cancer treatment. Awareness of the range of clinical and radiological manifestations associated with different neural autoantibodies, and the specific settings where autoimmune CNS disorders may occur is crucial to allow rapid diagnosis and early initiation of treatment.
抗体介导的中枢神经系统(CNS)疾病越来越被认为是一种神经系统疾病,可能很严重甚至危及生命,但通过适当治疗有可逆的可能。针对神经胶质或神经元(神经)抗原以及相关临床综合征(从自身免疫性脑炎到中枢神经系统脱髓鞘)的新发现自身抗体谱不断扩大,提高了诊断的准确性,并使人们能够对历史上与系统性疾病相关的非特异性神经综合征(如桥本脑病)进行重要的重新解读。不同神经自身抗体靶点在细胞内与细胞表面或突触的位置,通常有助于预测相关综合征的临床特征、潜在的癌症关联及治疗反应。特别是,针对细胞内抗原的自身抗体(传统上称为肿瘤神经自身抗体)通常与癌症相关,对免疫抑制反应不佳且预后不良,不过也有例外情况。在具有相符临床-磁共振成像(MRI)表型的患者中,通过准确的实验室检测方法检测神经自身抗体,可明确诊断抗体介导的中枢神经系统疾病,这对治疗和预后具有重要意义。抗体介导的中枢神经系统疾病较为罕见,可靠的自身抗体鉴定在很大程度上取决于所使用的检测技术和检测前的可能性。因此,在患有更常见神经系统疾病(如癫痫、痴呆)的患者中进行不加选择的神经自身抗体检测必然会增加假阳性的风险,所以识别高风险的临床-MRI表型至关重要。最近人们认识到一些新出现的临床情况有利于中枢神经系统自身免疫性疾病的发生。这些情况包括单纯疱疹病毒性脑炎后或移植后发生的抗体介导的中枢神经系统疾病,以及由用于癌症治疗的肿瘤坏死因子α(TNFα)抑制剂或免疫检查点抑制剂引发的神经自身免疫性疾病。了解与不同神经自身抗体相关的一系列临床和放射学表现,以及自身免疫性中枢神经系统疾病可能发生的特定情况,对于实现快速诊断和尽早开始治疗至关重要。