• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经外侧入路使用空心螺钉行微创骶髂关节融合术的围手术期结果:单术者回顾性队列研究

Perioperative Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Sacroilliac Joint Fusion Using Hollow Screws Through a Lateral Approach: A Single Surgeon Retrospective Cohort Study.

作者信息

Abbasi Hamid, Storlie Nick, Rusten Mitch

机构信息

Neurosurgery, Ambulatory Surgical Clinic, Tristate Brain and Spine Institute, Alexandria, USA.

Neurosurgery, Inspired Spine Health, Minneapolis, USA.

出版信息

Cureus. 2021 Jul 20;13(7):e16517. doi: 10.7759/cureus.16517. eCollection 2021 Jul.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.16517
PMID:34306901
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8294031/
Abstract

Sacroiliac joint (SIJ) pain is a common cause of lower back pain and a significant source of disability in the United States. There is no consensus on the best surgical treatment for SIJ pain that is not responsive to conservative therapy. Minimally invasive fusion of the SIJ using hollow fenestrated screws from a lateral trajectory is a newer technique for SIJ fusion. This study presents perioperative and patient-reported outcomes amongst 62 patients who underwent SIJ fixation with hollow fenestrated screws. We find that mean disability on the Oswestry disability index improved from 52.2% to 34.9% at one-year post-op. Mean operative time was 34±9 minutes and blood loss was 22±35ml. Only six patients required overnight hospitalization. There were two cases of complications requiring operative intervention. We conclude that SIJ fixation using hollow fenestrated screws is a safe and effective procedure for the fixation of the SIJ. Further investigation is warranted to determine the best surgical treatment for SIJ pain.

摘要

骶髂关节(SIJ)疼痛是美国下背部疼痛的常见原因,也是导致残疾的重要因素。对于对保守治疗无反应的SIJ疼痛,最佳手术治疗方法尚无共识。采用外侧入路空心开窗螺钉进行SIJ微创融合是一种较新的SIJ融合技术。本研究呈现了62例行空心开窗螺钉固定SIJ患者的围手术期情况及患者报告的结果。我们发现,术后一年,Oswestry功能障碍指数的平均功能障碍从52.2%改善至34.9%。平均手术时间为34±9分钟,失血量为22±35毫升。仅6例患者需要过夜住院。有2例并发症需要手术干预。我们得出结论,使用空心开窗螺钉固定SIJ是一种安全有效的SIJ固定方法。有必要进行进一步研究以确定SIJ疼痛的最佳手术治疗方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/54d1/8294031/263eb8b09c17/cureus-0013-00000016517-i03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/54d1/8294031/0339f0733a42/cureus-0013-00000016517-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/54d1/8294031/f426c4ff5a96/cureus-0013-00000016517-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/54d1/8294031/263eb8b09c17/cureus-0013-00000016517-i03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/54d1/8294031/0339f0733a42/cureus-0013-00000016517-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/54d1/8294031/f426c4ff5a96/cureus-0013-00000016517-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/54d1/8294031/263eb8b09c17/cureus-0013-00000016517-i03.jpg

相似文献

1
Perioperative Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Sacroilliac Joint Fusion Using Hollow Screws Through a Lateral Approach: A Single Surgeon Retrospective Cohort Study.经外侧入路使用空心螺钉行微创骶髂关节融合术的围手术期结果:单术者回顾性队列研究
Cureus. 2021 Jul 20;13(7):e16517. doi: 10.7759/cureus.16517. eCollection 2021 Jul.
2
Early results of sacro-iliac joint fixation following long fusion to the sacrum in adult spine deformity.成人脊柱畸形长节段融合至骶骨后骶髂关节固定的早期结果。
HSS J. 2014 Feb;10(1):30-5. doi: 10.1007/s11420-013-9374-4. Epub 2013 Dec 11.
3
Stabilization of the sacroiliac joint.骶髂关节稳定术。
Neurosurg Focus. 2013 Jul;35(2 Suppl):Editorial. doi: 10.3171/2013.V2.FOCUS13273.
4
CT Scan and Clinical Outcomes of Novel Lateral-Oblique Percutaneous Sacroiliac Joint (SIJ) Fixation: Technique and Literature Review.新型外侧斜行经皮骶髂关节固定术的CT扫描及临床结果:技术与文献综述
Cureus. 2021 Jul 15;13(7):e16408. doi: 10.7759/cureus.16408. eCollection 2021 Jul.
5
Posterior Oblique Approach for Sacroiliac Joint Fusion.骶髂关节融合的后斜入路
Cureus. 2023 Jan 8;15(1):e33502. doi: 10.7759/cureus.33502. eCollection 2023 Jan.
6
First clinical results of a novel minimally-invasive fusion system for the sacroiliac joint.新型微创骶髂关节融合系统的初步临床结果。
Technol Health Care. 2022;30(5):1139-1145. doi: 10.3233/THC-213348.
7
Salvage of Failed Lateral Sacroiliac Joint Fusion with a Novel Posterior Sacroiliac Fusion Device: Diagnostic Approach, Surgical Technique, and Multicenter Case Series.使用新型骶髂关节后路融合装置挽救失败的骶髂关节外侧融合术:诊断方法、手术技术及多中心病例系列
J Pain Res. 2022 May 12;15:1411-1420. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S357076. eCollection 2022.
8
The sacro-iliac joint: A potentially painful enigma. Update on the diagnosis and treatment of pain from micro-trauma.骶髂关节:一个潜在的疼痛谜团。探讨源于微创伤的疼痛的诊断和治疗。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2019 Feb;105(1S):S31-S42. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2018.05.019. Epub 2019 Jan 4.
9
Posterior oblique technique for sacroiliac joint fusion leads to greater pain relief and similar improvement in function compared to the lateral technique: A retrospective, comparative study.与外侧技术相比,骶髂关节融合的后斜位技术能带来更大程度的疼痛缓解且功能改善相似:一项回顾性比较研究。
N Am Spine Soc J. 2023 Aug 5;15:100259. doi: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2023.100259. eCollection 2023 Sep.
10
Pain Relief Salvage with a Novel Minimally Invasive Posterior Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Device in Patients with Previously Implanted Pain Devices and Therapies.采用新型微创骶髂关节后路融合装置对曾植入止痛装置和接受过止痛治疗的患者进行疼痛缓解挽救治疗。
J Pain Res. 2021 Sep 2;14:2709-2715. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S325059. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical outcome measures following lateral versus posterior sacroiliac joint fusion: Systematic review and meta-analysis.骶髂关节外侧与后侧融合术后的临床结局指标:系统评价与荟萃分析。
Brain Spine. 2025 Feb 12;5:104212. doi: 10.1016/j.bas.2025.104212. eCollection 2025.
2
Efficacy of Lateral Sacroiliac Joint Fusion With the Trident™ Screw System: A Retrospective Analysis.使用Trident™螺钉系统进行骶髂关节外侧融合术的疗效:一项回顾性分析。
Cureus. 2025 Jan 21;17(1):e77793. doi: 10.7759/cureus.77793. eCollection 2025 Jan.
3
Minimally invasive lateral, posterior, and posterolateral sacroiliac joint fusion for low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion: The Current Evidence.微创骶髂关节融合术:当前证据
Int J Spine Surg. 2020 Feb 10;14(Suppl 1):20-29. doi: 10.14444/6072. eCollection 2020 Feb.
2
Triangular Titanium Implants for Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion: 2-Year Follow-Up from a Prospective Multicenter Trial.用于微创骶髂关节融合的三角形钛植入物:一项前瞻性多中心试验的2年随访
Int J Spine Surg. 2016 Apr 20;10:13. doi: 10.14444/3013. eCollection 2016.
3
Sacroiliac Joint Pain and Its Treatment.骶髂关节疼痛及其治疗
微创外侧、后侧及后外侧骶髂关节融合术治疗腰痛:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
J Int Med Res. 2025 Feb;53(2):3000605251315300. doi: 10.1177/03000605251315300.
4
Utility of minimally invasive percutaneous arthrodesis of the sacroiliac joint for the treatment of low back pain: systematic review of the literature.微创经皮骶髂关节融合术治疗腰痛的效用:文献系统评价
Eur Spine J. 2025 Mar;34(3):974-1003. doi: 10.1007/s00586-024-08629-4. Epub 2025 Jan 30.
5
American Society of Pain and Neuroscience Best Practice (ASPN) Guideline for the Treatment of Sacroiliac Disorders.美国疼痛与神经科学学会骶髂关节疾病治疗最佳实践(ASPN)指南
J Pain Res. 2024 May 3;17:1601-1638. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S464393. eCollection 2024.
6
Effect of revision sacroiliac joint fusion on unresolved pain and disability: a retrospective cohort study.骶髂关节融合翻修术对未解决的疼痛和残疾的影响:一项回顾性队列研究。
Eur Spine J. 2024 Feb;33(2):533-542. doi: 10.1007/s00586-023-08104-6. Epub 2024 Jan 9.
7
Minimally Invasive SI Joint Fusion Procedures for Chronic SI Joint Pain: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Safety and Efficacy.慢性骶髂关节疼痛的微创骶髂关节融合手术:安全性和有效性的系统评价与荟萃分析
Int J Spine Surg. 2023 Dec 26;17(6):794-808. doi: 10.14444/8543.
8
Posterior oblique technique for sacroiliac joint fusion leads to greater pain relief and similar improvement in function compared to the lateral technique: A retrospective, comparative study.与外侧技术相比,骶髂关节融合的后斜位技术能带来更大程度的疼痛缓解且功能改善相似:一项回顾性比较研究。
N Am Spine Soc J. 2023 Aug 5;15:100259. doi: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2023.100259. eCollection 2023 Sep.
Clin Spine Surg. 2016 Mar;29(2):42-8. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000359.
4
Quality of life in preoperative patients with sacroiliac joint dysfunction is at least as depressed as in other lumbar spinal conditions.术前患有骶髂关节功能障碍患者的生活质量至少与其他腰椎疾病患者一样低落。
Med Devices (Auckl). 2015 Sep 16;8:395-403. doi: 10.2147/MDER.S92070. eCollection 2015.
5
Randomized Controlled Trial of Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Using Triangular Titanium Implants vs Nonsurgical Management for Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction: 12-Month Outcomes.使用三角形钛植入物的微创骶髂关节融合术与非手术治疗骶髂关节功能障碍的随机对照试验:12个月的结果。
Neurosurgery. 2015 Nov;77(5):674-90; discussion 690-1. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000000988.
6
The global burden of low back pain: estimates from the Global Burden of Disease 2010 study.全球腰痛负担:来自 2010 年全球疾病负担研究的估计。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2014 Jun;73(6):968-74. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204428. Epub 2014 Mar 24.
7
Utilization of Minimally Invasive Surgical Approach for Sacroiliac Joint Fusion in Surgeon Population of ISASS and SMISS Membership.在国际骶髂关节学会(ISASS)和脊柱微创学会(SMISS)成员的外科医生群体中,采用微创外科手术方法进行骶髂关节融合术。
Open Orthop J. 2014 Jan 24;8:1-6. doi: 10.2174/1874325001408010001. eCollection 2014.
8
The percutaneous stabilisation of the sacroiliac joint with hollow modular anchorage screws: a prospective outcome study.采用中空模块化锚固螺钉经皮稳定骶髂关节:一项前瞻性结果研究。
Eur Spine J. 2013 Oct;22(10):2325-31. doi: 10.1007/s00586-013-2825-2. Epub 2013 May 18.
9
Etiology of chronic low back pain in patients having undergone lumbar fusion.腰椎融合术后慢性下腰痛的病因。
Pain Med. 2011 May;12(5):732-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2011.01098.x. Epub 2011 Apr 11.
10
What is the source of chronic low back pain and does age play a role?慢性下背痛的病因是什么,年龄是否起作用?
Pain Med. 2011 Feb;12(2):224-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2010.01045.x. Epub 2011 Jan 25.