Çakmak Ender Özgün, Bayam Emrah, Çelik Mehmet, Kahyaoğlu Muzaffer, Eren Kıvanç, Imanov Elmin, Karagöz Ali, İzgi İbrahim Akın
Department of Cardiology, University of Medical Sciences, Kartal Kosuyolu High Specialty Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Department of Cardiology, Gaziantep Abdülkadir Yüksel State Hospital, Gaziantep, Turkey.
Pulse (Basel). 2021 Jun;8(3-4):99-107. doi: 10.1159/000514533. Epub 2021 Mar 4.
This research aimed to investigate the predictive value of the uric acid-to-serum albumin ratio (UAR) in establishing the severity and extent of coronary artery disease (CAD) with non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) patients.
A total of 402 patients (mean age 63.5 ± 11.6 years) were included in this retrospectively designed study. We compared Synergy between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with Taxus and Cardiac Surgery Scores (SS) between low (≤22) and intermediate-high (>22) groups. The UAR, the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and the C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio (CAR) were evaluated and compared.
SS >22 were observed in 30.8% ( = 124) of the patients, and their UAR, NLR, and CAR were significantly higher. Three separate multivariate analysis models performed as the outcome of a reliable correlation between UAR, NLR, CAR, and consequently UAR (OR = 2.08; 95% CI 1.21-3.58; = 0.008) and CAR (OR = 3.33; 95% CI 1.85-5.9; < 0.001) reached significance but NLR (OR = 1.26; 95% CI 0.86-1.84; = 0.20) clinically trended significance (not statistically). Model performance comparisons demonstrated that UAR is a better predictor regarding likelihood ratios (UAR, 60.95; NLR, 57.8; and CAR, 59.0).
As a novel inflammatory marker, UAR independently predicted better outcomes than CAR and might be used reliably in prediction of the extent of CAD in NSTEMI patients.
本研究旨在探讨尿酸与血清白蛋白比值(UAR)在评估非ST段抬高型心肌梗死(NSTEMI)患者冠状动脉疾病(CAD)的严重程度和范围方面的预测价值。
本项回顾性研究共纳入402例患者(平均年龄63.5±11.6岁)。我们比较了低(≤22)组和中高(>22)组的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与心脏手术评分协同(SS)。对UAR、中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)以及C反应蛋白与白蛋白比值(CAR)进行了评估和比较。
30.8%(n = 124)的患者SS>22,其UAR、NLR和CAR显著更高。三个独立的多变量分析模型显示,UAR、NLR、CAR与UAR(OR = 2.08;95%CI 1.21 - 3.58;P = 0.008)和CAR(OR = 3.33;95%CI 1.85 - 5.9;P < 0.001)之间存在可靠的相关性,但NLR(OR = 1.26;95%CI 0.86 - 1.84;P = 0.20)在临床上有显著趋势(无统计学意义)。模型性能比较表明,就似然比而言,UAR是更好的预测指标(UAR为60.95;NLR为57.8;CAR为59.0)。
作为一种新型炎症标志物,UAR比CAR能更独立地预测更好的结果,并且可能可靠地用于预测NSTEMI患者CAD的范围。