Liatsos George D
Department of Internal Medicine, "Hippokration" General Hospital, Athens 11527, Attiki, Greece.
World J Clin Cases. 2021 Jul 6;9(19):5135-5178. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i19.5135.
Ribavirin is a broad-spectrum nucleoside antiviral drug with multimodal mechanisms of action, which supports its longevity and quality as a clinical resource. It has been widely administered for measles and coronavirus infections. Despite the large amount of data concerning the use of ribavirin alone or in combination for measles, severe acute respiratory syndrome, Middle East respiratory syndrome, and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreaks, the conclusions of these studies have been contradictory. Underlying reasons for these discrepancies include possible study design inaccuracies and failures and misinterpretations of data, and these potential confounds should be addressed.
To determine the confounding factors of ribavirin treatment studies and propose a therapeutic scheme for COVID-19.
PubMed database was searched over a period of five decades utilizing the terms "ribavirin" alone or combined with other compounds in measles, severe acute respiratory syndrome, Middle East respiratory syndrome, and COVID-19 infections. The literature search was performed and described according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Articles were considered eligible when they reported on ribavirin dose regimens and/or specified outcomes concerning its efficacy and/or possible adverse-effects. and animal studies were also retrieved. A chapter on ribavirin's pharmacology was included as well.
In addition to the difficulties and pressures of an emerging pandemic, there is the burden of designing and conducting well-organized, double-blind, randomized controlled trials. Many studies have succumbed to specific pitfalls, one of which was identified in naturally ribavirin-resistant Vero cell lines in studies. Other pitfalls include study design inconsistent with the well-established clinical course of disease; inappropriate pharmacology of applied treatments; and the misinterpretation of study results with misconceived generalizations. A comprehensive treatment for COVID-19 is proposed, documented by thorough, long-term investigation of ribavirin regimens in coronavirus infections.
A comprehensive treatment strictly tailored to distinct disease stages was proposed based upon studies on ribavirin and coronavirus infections.
利巴韦林是一种具有多模式作用机制的广谱核苷类抗病毒药物,这支持了其作为临床资源的长期使用和质量。它已被广泛用于治疗麻疹和冠状病毒感染。尽管有大量关于单独使用或联合使用利巴韦林治疗麻疹、严重急性呼吸综合征、中东呼吸综合征和2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)疫情的数据,但这些研究的结论相互矛盾。这些差异的潜在原因包括可能的研究设计不准确、失败以及数据的错误解读,这些潜在的混杂因素应予以解决。
确定利巴韦林治疗研究的混杂因素,并提出COVID-19的治疗方案。
在五十年的时间里,利用“利巴韦林”单独或与麻疹、严重急性呼吸综合征、中东呼吸综合征和COVID-19感染中的其他化合物组合的术语搜索PubMed数据库。文献检索按照系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目指南进行。当文章报道利巴韦林剂量方案和/或关于其疗效和/或可能的不良反应的特定结果时,这些文章被认为是合格的。还检索了动物研究。还纳入了一章关于利巴韦林药理学的内容。
除了新出现的大流行带来的困难和压力外,设计和开展组织良好的双盲随机对照试验也存在负担。许多研究陷入了特定的陷阱,其中之一在研究中天然对利巴韦林耐药的Vero细胞系中被发现。其他陷阱包括与既定疾病临床病程不一致的研究设计;应用治疗的药理学不当;以及对研究结果的错误解读和错误的概括。基于对冠状病毒感染中利巴韦林方案的全面、长期研究,提出了一种针对COVID-19的综合治疗方法。
基于对利巴韦林和冠状病毒感染的研究,提出了一种严格针对不同疾病阶段的综合治疗方法。