Korfmacher Katrina Smith
Department of Environmental Medicine, University of Rochester, Box EHSC, 601 Elmwood Avenue, Rochester, NY 14642.
Chron Health Impact Assess. 2020 Oct;5(1). doi: 10.18060/24034. Epub 2020 Nov 17.
Communities, professionals, and researchers recognize that environmental factors contribute to the health inequities experienced by vulnerable populations in the U.S. These environmental health injustices persist despite well-developed systems for both public health and environmental protection. The root cause of these issues is often "siloed" decision-making by separate health and environmental institutions. Health Impact Assessment (HIA) can be an important tool for bridging these silos to promote health equity at the local level. This raises the question: how can external resources best support local initiatives? This paper examines the interaction between national, state, and non-governmental efforts to promote HIA and local actions to promote healthy and equitable built environment in Duluth, MN. A wide range of local activities in Duluth aimed to alter the long term trends, decision processes, and institutions shaping its built environment. These included integrating health in brownfield redevelopment, local land use plans, food access, and transportation decisions. Technical and financial support from external groups played a key role in developing the community's capacity to promote health equity across public, private, and non-profit organizations. These multiple streams of action culminated in the mayor's declaration in 2016 that health and fairness would be adopted as key goals of the city's new Comprehensive Plan. How did such innovative efforts thrive in a small, post-industrial city with limited resources? Duluth's experiences provide insight into how external governmental, funding, academic, and non-profit entities can more effectively, efficiently, and equitably support the evolution of local initiatives.
社区、专业人士和研究人员认识到,环境因素导致了美国弱势群体所经历的健康不平等。尽管公共卫生和环境保护系统已较为完善,但这些环境卫生不公正现象依然存在。这些问题的根源往往是卫生和环境机构各自为政的“孤立”决策。健康影响评估(HIA)可以成为消除这些隔阂、在地方层面促进健康公平的重要工具。这就引出了一个问题:外部资源如何才能最好地支持地方倡议?本文考察了国家、州和非政府组织为推动健康影响评估所做的努力与明尼苏达州德卢斯市为促进健康且公平的建成环境所采取的地方行动之间的相互作用。德卢斯市开展了广泛的地方活动,旨在改变塑造其建成环境的长期趋势、决策过程和机构。这些活动包括将健康纳入棕地再开发、地方土地利用规划、食品获取和交通决策之中。外部团体提供的技术和资金支持在提升社区跨公共、私营和非营利组织促进健康公平的能力方面发挥了关键作用。这些多方面的行动最终促成市长在2016年宣布将健康和公平作为该市新综合规划的关键目标。在一个资源有限的小型后工业化城市,这样的创新举措是如何蓬勃发展的呢?德卢斯市的经验为外部政府、资助机构、学术机构和非营利实体如何更有效、高效且公平地支持地方倡议的发展提供了见解。