• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

加拿大健康设计CLASP:从一个跨部门、跨省的建筑环境倡议第一阶段汲取的经验教训。

Healthy Canada by Design CLASP: Lessons learned from the first phase of an intersectoral, cross-provincial, built environment initiative.

作者信息

Miro Alice, Kishchuk Natalie A, Perrotta Kim, Swinkels Helena M

机构信息

Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada.

出版信息

Can J Public Health. 2014 Sep 12;106(1 Suppl 1):eS50-63. doi: 10.17269/cjph.106.4555.

DOI:10.17269/cjph.106.4555
PMID:25955549
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6972300/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The Healthy Canada by Design (HCBD) CLASP (Coalitions Linking Action and Science for Prevention) Initiative promotes the building of communities that support health by 1) facilitating the integration of health evidence into built environment decision-making; 2) developing new, cross-sector collaboration models and tools; and 3) fostering a national community of practice.

PARTICIPANTS

A coalition of public health professionals, researchers, professional planners and non-governmental organization (NGO) staff from across Canada developed, implemented and participated in the Initiative.

SETTINGS

In the first phase, HCBD interventions took place for the most part in large urban and suburban settings in Quebec, Ontario and British Columbia. National knowledge transfer and exchange (KTE) activities were delivered both locally and nationally.

INTERVENTION

Project participants developed tools or processes for collaboration between the health and the community planning sectors. These were designed to increase the capacity of the health sector to influence decisions about land use and transportation planning. Tool or process development was accompanied by pilot testing, evaluation, and dissemination of findings and lessons learned. On a parallel track, NGOs involved with HCBD led national KTE interventions.

OUTCOMES

The first phase of HCBD demonstrated the potential for public health organizations to influence the built environment determinants of cancer and chronic diseases. Public health authorities forged relationships with several organizations with a stake in built environment decisions, including municipal and regional planning departments, provincial governments, federal government agencies, researchers, community groups and NGOs. The Initiative accomplished the following: 1) created new relationships across sectors and across health authorities; 2) improved the knowledge and skills for influencing land use planning processes among public health professionals; 3) increased awareness of health evidence and intent to change practice among built environment decision-makers; and 4) facilitated inclusion of health considerations in local plans, policies and decisions.

CONCLUSIONS

The first phase of HCBD engaged built environment stakeholders, including public health professionals, planners, researchers, community groups and NGOs, in ways that would be expected to influence health risk factors and population health outcomes in the long term.

摘要

目标

“加拿大健康设计(HCBD)”的CLASP(预防行动与科学联盟)倡议促进建设支持健康的社区,其方式包括:1)推动将健康证据纳入建筑环境决策;2)开发新的跨部门合作模式和工具;3)培育全国性的实践社区。

参与者

来自加拿大各地的公共卫生专业人员、研究人员、专业规划师和非政府组织(NGO)工作人员组成的联盟制定、实施并参与了该倡议。

地点

在第一阶段,HCBD干预大多在魁北克省、安大略省和不列颠哥伦比亚省的大型城市和郊区进行。全国性的知识转移与交流(KTE)活动在当地和全国范围内开展。

干预措施

项目参与者开发了卫生部门与社区规划部门之间的合作工具或流程。这些工具或流程旨在增强卫生部门影响土地使用和交通规划决策的能力。工具或流程开发伴随着试点测试、评估以及研究结果和经验教训的传播。与此同时,参与HCBD的非政府组织主导了全国性的KTE干预。

成果

HCBD的第一阶段表明,公共卫生组织有潜力影响癌症和慢性病的建筑环境决定因素。公共卫生当局与多个在建筑环境决策中有利害关系的组织建立了关系,包括市和区域规划部门、省政府、联邦政府机构、研究人员、社区团体和非政府组织。该倡议取得了以下成果:1)在各部门和各卫生当局之间建立了新关系;2)提高了公共卫生专业人员影响土地使用规划流程的知识和技能;3)增强了建筑环境决策者对健康证据的认识以及改变做法的意愿;4)促进了在地方规划、政策和决策中纳入对健康的考虑。

结论

HCBD的第一阶段让包括公共卫生专业人员、规划师、研究人员、社区团体和非政府组织在内的建筑环境利益相关者参与进来,有望从长远角度影响健康风险因素和人群健康结果。

相似文献

1
Healthy Canada by Design CLASP: Lessons learned from the first phase of an intersectoral, cross-provincial, built environment initiative.加拿大健康设计CLASP:从一个跨部门、跨省的建筑环境倡议第一阶段汲取的经验教训。
Can J Public Health. 2014 Sep 12;106(1 Suppl 1):eS50-63. doi: 10.17269/cjph.106.4555.
2
Building the capacity of health authorities to influence land use and transportation planning: Lessons learned from the Healthy Canada by Design CLASP Project in British Columbia.建设卫生部门影响土地利用和交通规划的能力:从加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省“健康设计”CLASP项目中汲取的经验教训。
Can J Public Health. 2014 Aug 6;106(1 Suppl 1):eS40-52. doi: 10.17269/cjph.106.4566.
3
Pathways to policy: Lessons learned in multisectoral collaboration for physical activity and built environment policy development from the Coalitions Linking Action and Science for Prevention (CLASP) initiative.政策制定途径:从预防行动与科学联盟(CLASP)倡议中汲取的多部门合作制定身体活动与建成环境政策的经验教训。
Can J Public Health. 2017 Jun 16;108(2):e192-e198. doi: 10.17269/cjph.108.5758.
4
Identifying mechanisms for facilitating knowledge to action strategies targeting the built environment.确定促进针对建成环境的知识转化为行动策略的机制。
BMC Public Health. 2017 Jan 3;17(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3954-4.
5
Healthy Toronto by Design: Promoting a healthier built environment.《多伦多健康设计:促进更健康的建筑环境》
Can J Public Health. 2014 Jul 8;106(1 Suppl 1):eS5-8. doi: 10.17269/cjph.106.3855.
6
Building a community of practice: Healthy Canada by Design CLASP Renewal--Postscript.建立实践社区:加拿大健康设计CLASP更新——后记
Can J Public Health. 2014 Oct 29;106(1 Suppl 1):eS59-61, eS64-7. doi: 10.17269/cjph.106.4635.
7
From partnership to policy: the evolution of Active Living by Design in Portland, Oregon.从伙伴关系到政策:俄勒冈州波特兰市积极生活设计的演变。
Am J Prev Med. 2009 Dec;37(6 Suppl 2):S436-44. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.09.008.
8
Intersectoral Policy Priorities for Health卫生领域的跨部门政策优先事项
9
The potential of health sector non-governmental organizations: policy options.卫生部门非政府组织的潜力:政策选择
Health Policy Plan. 1994 Mar;9(1):14-24. doi: 10.1093/heapol/9.1.14.
10
Qualitative Exploration of Cross-Sector Perspectives on the Contributions of Local Health Departments in Land-Use and Transportation Policy.定性探索地方卫生部门在土地使用和交通政策方面的贡献的跨部门视角。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2017 Nov 22;14:E118. doi: 10.5888/pcd14.170226.

引用本文的文献

1
Intersectoral Partnerships Between Local Governments and Health Organisations in High-Income Contexts: A Scoping Review.高收入国家中地方政府与卫生组织之间的跨部门伙伴关系:范围综述。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2024;13:7841. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2024.7841. Epub 2024 Feb 18.
2
Basic Criteria, Models, and Indicators of Intersectoral Collaboration in Health Promotion: A Scoping Review.健康促进领域跨部门合作的基本标准、模式及指标:一项范围综述
Iran J Public Health. 2021 May;50(5):852-865. doi: 10.18502/ijph.v50i5.6103.
3
Municipal transportation policy as a population health intervention: estimating the impact of the City of Ottawa Transportation Master Plan on diabetes incidence.城市交通政策作为一种人口健康干预措施:评估渥太华市交通总体规划对糖尿病发病率的影响。
Can J Public Health. 2019 Jun;110(3):285-293. doi: 10.17269/s41997-018-0168-9. Epub 2019 Jan 9.
4
Pathways to policy: Lessons learned in multisectoral collaboration for physical activity and built environment policy development from the Coalitions Linking Action and Science for Prevention (CLASP) initiative.政策制定途径:从预防行动与科学联盟(CLASP)倡议中汲取的多部门合作制定身体活动与建成环境政策的经验教训。
Can J Public Health. 2017 Jun 16;108(2):e192-e198. doi: 10.17269/cjph.108.5758.

本文引用的文献

1
The influence of urban design on neighbourhood walking following residential relocation: longitudinal results from the RESIDE study.城市设计对居住迁移后邻里步行的影响:来自 RESIDE 研究的纵向结果。
Soc Sci Med. 2013 Jan;77:20-30. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.10.016. Epub 2012 Nov 7.
2
Built environment, physical activity, and obesity: what have we learned from reviewing the literature?建筑环境、身体活动与肥胖:从文献回顾中我们学到了什么?
Health Place. 2012 Jan;18(1):100-5. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2011.08.021. Epub 2011 Sep 13.
3
Research, practice, and policy partnerships in pan-Canadian coalitions for cancer and chronic disease prevention.泛加癌症和慢性病预防联盟中的研究、实践和政策伙伴关系。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2011 Nov-Dec;17(6):E1-E11. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0b013e318215a4ae.
4
Identifying GIS measures of the physical activity built environment through a review of the literature.通过文献回顾确定体力活动的 GIS 环境测量指标。
J Phys Act Health. 2011 Jan;8 Suppl 1:S91-7. doi: 10.1123/jpah.8.s1.s91.
5
A systematic review of built environment factors related to physical activity and obesity risk: implications for smart growth urban planning.一项有关与体力活动和肥胖风险相关的建筑环境因素的系统评价:对智能增长城市规划的启示。
Obes Rev. 2011 May;12(5):e173-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2010.00826.x. Epub 2011 Feb 23.
6
Built environment correlates of walking: a review.步行与建成环境的相关性:综述
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008 Jul;40(7 Suppl):S550-66. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e31817c67a4.
7
Confronting the challenges in reconnecting urban planning and public health.应对城市规划与公共卫生重新接轨过程中的挑战。
Am J Public Health. 2004 Apr;94(4):541-6. doi: 10.2105/ajph.94.4.541.
8
A review of collaborative partnerships as a strategy for improving community health.作为改善社区健康策略的合作关系综述。
Annu Rev Public Health. 2000;21:369-402. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.21.1.369.