• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Socioeconomic inequalities in dementia risk among a French population-based cohort: quantifying the role of cardiovascular health and vascular events.法国基于人群队列中痴呆症风险的社会经济不平等:量化心血管健康和血管事件的作用。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2021 Oct;36(10):1015-1023. doi: 10.1007/s10654-021-00788-8. Epub 2021 Jul 25.
2
Cardiovascular health metrics from mid- to late-life and risk of dementia: A population-based cohort study in Finland.从中年到晚年的心血管健康指标与痴呆风险:芬兰的一项基于人群的队列研究。
PLoS Med. 2020 Dec 15;17(12):e1003474. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003474. eCollection 2020 Dec.
3
LifeCourse Socioeconomic Position and Ideal Cardiovascular Health in Hispanic/Latino Adults of the Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos.生命历程社会经济地位与西班牙裔/拉丁裔成年人理想心血管健康:西班牙裔社区健康研究/拉丁裔研究
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Aug 20;13(16):e035503. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.035503. Epub 2024 Aug 9.
4
Behavioral risk factors and socioeconomic inequalities in ischemic heart disease mortality in the United States: A causal mediation analysis using record linkage data.美国缺血性心脏病死亡率的行为风险因素和社会经济不平等:基于记录链接数据的因果中介分析。
PLoS Med. 2024 Sep 17;21(9):e1004455. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004455. eCollection 2024 Sep.
5
Distribution of Cardiovascular Health by Individual- and Neighborhood-Level Socioeconomic Status: Findings From the Jackson Heart Study.个体和邻里社会经济地位的心血管健康分布:杰克逊心脏研究的结果。
Glob Heart. 2019 Sep;14(3):241-250. doi: 10.1016/j.gheart.2019.04.007. Epub 2019 Jun 10.
6
Cardiovascular health, genetic risk, and risk of dementia in the Framingham Heart Study.心血管健康、遗传风险与弗雷明汉心脏研究中的痴呆风险。
Neurology. 2020 Sep 8;95(10):e1341-e1350. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000010306. Epub 2020 Jul 20.
7
The role of cardiovascular disease in the relationship between air pollution and incident dementia: a population-based cohort study.心血管疾病在空气污染与痴呆症发病关系中的作用:基于人群的队列研究。
Int J Epidemiol. 2020 Feb 1;49(1):36-44. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyz154.
8
Associations of socioeconomic status and healthy lifestyle with incident early-onset and late-onset dementia: a prospective cohort study.社会经济地位和健康生活方式与早发性和晚发性痴呆发病的相关性:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Lancet Healthy Longev. 2023 Dec;4(12):e693-e702. doi: 10.1016/S2666-7568(23)00211-8.
9
Favorable Cardiovascular Health at Young and Middle Ages and Dementia in Older Age-The CHA Study.年轻时心血管健康状况良好与老年痴呆症的关系:CHA 研究。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Jan 8;8(1):e009730. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.009730.
10
The association of personal and neighborhood socioeconomic indicators with subclinical cardiovascular disease in an elderly cohort. The cardiovascular health study.老年队列中个人及邻里社会经济指标与亚临床心血管疾病的关联。心血管健康研究。
Soc Sci Med. 2004 Nov;59(10):2139-47. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.03.017.

引用本文的文献

1
Mediators of educational differences in dementia risk later in life: evidence from the HUNT study.晚年痴呆症风险中教育差异的中介因素:来自HUNT研究的证据。
BMC Public Health. 2025 Apr 10;25(1):1336. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22592-9.
2
Mediation of the association between education and dementia by occupational complexity, income, health behaviours and health outcomes.职业复杂性、收入、健康行为和健康结果对教育与痴呆症之间关联的中介作用。
BMC Psychiatry. 2025 Feb 25;25(1):174. doi: 10.1186/s12888-025-06619-4.
3
Influence of intergenerational social mobility on brain structure and global cognition: findings from the Whitehall II study across 20 years.代际社会流动对大脑结构和整体认知的影响:来自 20 年的 Whitehall II 研究的发现。
Age Ageing. 2024 Oct 1;53(10). doi: 10.1093/ageing/afae221.
4
Estimating Socio-Economic Status for Alzheimer's Disease Trials.估算阿尔茨海默病试验的社会经济地位。
J Prev Alzheimers Dis. 2024;11(5):1418-1425. doi: 10.14283/jpad.2024.88.
5
The effect of diabetes in the multifaceted relationship between education and cognitive function.糖尿病对教育和认知功能之间多方面关系的影响。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Sep 27;24(1):2584. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-20156-x.
6
Role of cardiovascular health factors in mediating social inequalities in the incidence of dementia in the UK: two prospective, population-based cohort studies.心血管健康因素在介导英国痴呆症发病率的社会不平等方面的作用:两项基于人群的前瞻性队列研究。
EClinicalMedicine. 2024 Mar 14;70:102539. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102539. eCollection 2024 Apr.
7
Identifying the mediating role of inflammation on the relationship between socioeconomic status and Alzheimer's disease: a Mendelian randomization analysis and mediation analysis.鉴定炎症在社会经济地位与阿尔茨海默病之间关系中的中介作用:孟德尔随机分析和中介分析。
J Neurol. 2024 May;271(5):2484-2493. doi: 10.1007/s00415-023-12176-1. Epub 2024 Jan 22.
8
Understanding Drivers of Vaccine Hesitancy During the COVID-19 Pandemic Among Older Adults in Jiangsu Province, China: Cross-sectional Survey.了解中国江苏省老年人在新冠疫情期间疫苗犹豫的驱动因素:横断面调查
JMIR Form Res. 2023 Feb 7;7:e39994. doi: 10.2196/39994.
9
Childhood socio-economic circumstances and dementia: prospective register-based cohort study of adulthood socio-economic and cardiovascular health mediators.儿童时期的社会经济状况与痴呆症:成年期社会经济和心血管健康中介因素的前瞻性基于登记的队列研究。
Int J Epidemiol. 2023 Apr 19;52(2):523-535. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyac205.
10
Contribution of smoking towards the association between socioeconomic position and dementia: 32-year follow-up of the Whitehall II prospective cohort study.吸烟对社会经济地位与痴呆症之间关联的影响:白厅II前瞻性队列研究的32年随访
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2022 Sep 28;23:100516. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2022.100516. eCollection 2022 Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
Individual and neighbourhood socioeconomic inequalities in cognitive impairment: cross-sectional findings from the French CONSTANCES cohort.个体和邻里社会经济不平等与认知障碍:来自法国 CONSTANCES 队列的横断面研究结果。
BMJ Open. 2020 Mar 18;10(3):e033751. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033751.
2
Modifiable Risk Factors Explain Socioeconomic Inequalities in Dementia Risk: Evidence from a Population-Based Prospective Cohort Study.可改变的风险因素解释了痴呆风险的社会经济不平等:来自基于人群的前瞻性队列研究的证据。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2019;71(2):549-557. doi: 10.3233/JAD-190541.
3
Health and Socioeconomic Inequities as Contributors to Brain Health.健康与社会经济不平等对大脑健康的影响
JAMA Neurol. 2019 Jun 1;76(6):633-634. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2019.0362.
4
Socioeconomic disparity in prefrontal development during early childhood.儿童早期前额叶发育的社会经济差异。
Sci Rep. 2019 Feb 22;9(1):2585. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-39255-6.
5
Psychosocioeconomic Precariousness and Frailty: The Respective Contribution in Predicting Mortality.社会心理经济不稳定与衰弱:预测死亡率的各自贡献
J Frailty Aging. 2019;8(1):42-47. doi: 10.14283/jfa.2018.36.
6
Treatment Combinations for Alzheimer's Disease: Current and Future Pharmacotherapy Options.阿尔茨海默病的治疗联合用药:当前和未来的药物治疗选择。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2019;67(3):779-794. doi: 10.3233/JAD-180766.
7
Long-term effects of compulsory schooling on physical, mental and cognitive ageing: a natural experiment.义务教育对身体、心理和认知老化的长期影响:一项自然实验。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2019 Apr;73(4):370-376. doi: 10.1136/jech-2018-211746. Epub 2019 Jan 11.
8
Stroke and dementia risk: A systematic review and meta-analysis.中风和痴呆风险:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Alzheimers Dement. 2018 Nov;14(11):1416-1426. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2018.06.3061. Epub 2018 Aug 31.
9
Association of Cardiovascular Health Level in Older Age With Cognitive Decline and Incident Dementia.老年心血管健康水平与认知能力下降和痴呆症发病的关系。
JAMA. 2018 Aug 21;320(7):657-664. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.11499.
10
Evaluation of the Concurrent Trajectories of Cardiometabolic Risk Factors in the 14 Years Before Dementia.评估痴呆症发生前 14 年中心血管代谢风险因素的同步轨迹。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2018 Oct 1;75(10):1033-1042. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2018.2004.

法国基于人群队列中痴呆症风险的社会经济不平等:量化心血管健康和血管事件的作用。

Socioeconomic inequalities in dementia risk among a French population-based cohort: quantifying the role of cardiovascular health and vascular events.

作者信息

Letellier Noémie, Ilango Sindana D, Mortamais Marion, Tzourio Christophe, Gabelle Audrey, Empana Jean-Philippe, Samieri Cécilia, Berr Claudine, Benmarhnia Tarik

机构信息

Institute for Neurosciences of Montpellier INM, Univ Montpellier, INSERM, Montpellier, France.

School of Public Health, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, USA.

出版信息

Eur J Epidemiol. 2021 Oct;36(10):1015-1023. doi: 10.1007/s10654-021-00788-8. Epub 2021 Jul 25.

DOI:10.1007/s10654-021-00788-8
PMID:34308532
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8542549/
Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the role of cardiovascular health (CVH) and vascular events as potential contributors to socioeconomic inequalities in dementia using causal mediation analyses. We used data from the Three-City Cohort, a French population-based study with 12 years of follow-up, with active search of dementia cases and validated diagnosis. Individual socioeconomic status was assessed using education, occupation and income. A CVH score as defined by the American Heart Association and incident vascular events were considered separately as mediators. We performed multi-level Cox proportional and Aalen additive hazard regression models to estimate the total effects of socioeconomic status on dementia risk. To estimate natural direct and indirect effects through CVH and vascular events, we applied two distinct weighting methods to quantify the role of CVH and vascular events: Inverse Odds Ratio Weighting (IORW) and Marginal Structural Models (MSM) respectively. Among 5581 participants, the risk of dementia was higher among participants with primary education (HR 1.60, 95%CI 1.44-1.78), blue-collar workers (HR 1.62, 95%CI 1.43-1.84) and with lower income (HR 1.23, 95%CI 1.09-1.29). Using additive models, 571 (95% CI 288-782) and 634 (95% CI 246-1020) additional cases of dementia per 100 000 person and year were estimated for primary education and blue-collar occupation, respectively. Using IORW, the CVH score mediate the relationship between education or income, and dementia (proportion mediated 17% and 26%, respectively). Yet, considering vascular events as mediator, MSM generated indirect effects that were smaller and more imprecise. Socioeconomic inequalities in dementia risk were observed but marginally explained by CVH or vascular events mediators.

摘要

本研究旨在通过因果中介分析,探讨心血管健康(CVH)和血管事件在痴呆症社会经济不平等中作为潜在促成因素的作用。我们使用了来自三城市队列的数据,这是一项基于法国人群的研究,有12年的随访期,积极搜索痴呆症病例并进行了验证诊断。使用教育程度、职业和收入评估个体社会经济地位。分别将美国心脏协会定义的CVH评分和新发血管事件作为中介因素。我们进行了多层次Cox比例风险回归模型和Aalen累加风险回归模型,以估计社会经济地位对痴呆症风险的总体影响。为了估计通过CVH和血管事件产生的自然直接和间接影响,我们应用了两种不同的加权方法来量化CVH和血管事件的作用:分别是逆概率加权法(IORW)和边际结构模型(MSM)。在5581名参与者中,小学教育程度的参与者(风险比1.60,95%置信区间1.44 - 1.78)、蓝领工人(风险比1.62,95%置信区间1.43 - 1.84)和低收入者(风险比1.23,95%置信区间1.09 - 1.29)患痴呆症的风险更高。使用累加模型,估计小学教育程度和蓝领职业每10万人年分别有571例(95%置信区间288 - 782)和634例(95%置信区间246 - 1020)额外的痴呆症病例。使用IORW,CVH评分介导了教育程度或收入与痴呆症之间的关系(中介比例分别为17%和26%)。然而,将血管事件作为中介因素时,MSM产生的间接影响较小且更不精确。观察到痴呆症风险存在社会经济不平等,但CVH或血管事件中介因素对其解释程度有限。