Letellier Noémie, Ilango Sindana D, Mortamais Marion, Tzourio Christophe, Gabelle Audrey, Empana Jean-Philippe, Samieri Cécilia, Berr Claudine, Benmarhnia Tarik
Institute for Neurosciences of Montpellier INM, Univ Montpellier, INSERM, Montpellier, France.
School of Public Health, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, USA.
Eur J Epidemiol. 2021 Oct;36(10):1015-1023. doi: 10.1007/s10654-021-00788-8. Epub 2021 Jul 25.
This study aimed to investigate the role of cardiovascular health (CVH) and vascular events as potential contributors to socioeconomic inequalities in dementia using causal mediation analyses. We used data from the Three-City Cohort, a French population-based study with 12 years of follow-up, with active search of dementia cases and validated diagnosis. Individual socioeconomic status was assessed using education, occupation and income. A CVH score as defined by the American Heart Association and incident vascular events were considered separately as mediators. We performed multi-level Cox proportional and Aalen additive hazard regression models to estimate the total effects of socioeconomic status on dementia risk. To estimate natural direct and indirect effects through CVH and vascular events, we applied two distinct weighting methods to quantify the role of CVH and vascular events: Inverse Odds Ratio Weighting (IORW) and Marginal Structural Models (MSM) respectively. Among 5581 participants, the risk of dementia was higher among participants with primary education (HR 1.60, 95%CI 1.44-1.78), blue-collar workers (HR 1.62, 95%CI 1.43-1.84) and with lower income (HR 1.23, 95%CI 1.09-1.29). Using additive models, 571 (95% CI 288-782) and 634 (95% CI 246-1020) additional cases of dementia per 100 000 person and year were estimated for primary education and blue-collar occupation, respectively. Using IORW, the CVH score mediate the relationship between education or income, and dementia (proportion mediated 17% and 26%, respectively). Yet, considering vascular events as mediator, MSM generated indirect effects that were smaller and more imprecise. Socioeconomic inequalities in dementia risk were observed but marginally explained by CVH or vascular events mediators.
本研究旨在通过因果中介分析,探讨心血管健康(CVH)和血管事件在痴呆症社会经济不平等中作为潜在促成因素的作用。我们使用了来自三城市队列的数据,这是一项基于法国人群的研究,有12年的随访期,积极搜索痴呆症病例并进行了验证诊断。使用教育程度、职业和收入评估个体社会经济地位。分别将美国心脏协会定义的CVH评分和新发血管事件作为中介因素。我们进行了多层次Cox比例风险回归模型和Aalen累加风险回归模型,以估计社会经济地位对痴呆症风险的总体影响。为了估计通过CVH和血管事件产生的自然直接和间接影响,我们应用了两种不同的加权方法来量化CVH和血管事件的作用:分别是逆概率加权法(IORW)和边际结构模型(MSM)。在5581名参与者中,小学教育程度的参与者(风险比1.60,95%置信区间1.44 - 1.78)、蓝领工人(风险比1.62,95%置信区间1.43 - 1.84)和低收入者(风险比1.23,95%置信区间1.09 - 1.29)患痴呆症的风险更高。使用累加模型,估计小学教育程度和蓝领职业每10万人年分别有571例(95%置信区间288 - 782)和634例(95%置信区间246 - 1020)额外的痴呆症病例。使用IORW,CVH评分介导了教育程度或收入与痴呆症之间的关系(中介比例分别为17%和26%)。然而,将血管事件作为中介因素时,MSM产生的间接影响较小且更不精确。观察到痴呆症风险存在社会经济不平等,但CVH或血管事件中介因素对其解释程度有限。