• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的睡眠质量、健康状况和呼吸困难导致残疾之间的关联。

The association between sleep quality, health status and disability due to breathlessness in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients.

机构信息

Mental Health Research Center, Rasoul Akram Medical Complex, Iran University of Medical Sciences (IUMS), Tehran, Iran.

Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Hazrat-e Rasool General Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences (IUMS), Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

Clin Respir J. 2021 Nov;15(11):1168-1174. doi: 10.1111/crj.13423. Epub 2021 Aug 6.

DOI:10.1111/crj.13423
PMID:34310080
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) increases susceptibility to sleep disturbances. This study aimed to evaluate the association between COPD severity criteria with sleep quality.

METHODS

One hundred fifty-eight patients in Rasul Akram Hospital of Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran, from April 2019 to March 2021 diagnosed with COPD were examined using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), COPD Assessment Test (CAT), modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) dyspnoea scale, spirometry and pulse oximetry.

RESULTS

Of 158 subjects, 125 patients were male (79%), and 33 were female (21%). The mean subject's age and FEV1/FVC ratio were 62.6 ± 11.5 and 65.6 ± 14.9%, respectively. The mean CAT scoring and Spo2 saturation reported 16.2 ± 7 and 91.5 ± 10.8%, respectively. The mean PSQI score was 8.2 ± 3.8. The association between PSQI score with FEV1 and FEV1/FVC ratio was not statistically significant (p = 0.64 and 0.58, respectively), whereas the association between PSQI scores with CAT score (p ˂ 0.0001, r  = 0.51) and dyspnoea severity (p ˂ 0.0001, r  = 0.29) were statistically significant. The patients with higher CAT score demonstrated poor sleep quality, particularly in longer sleep latency (p = 0.001, r  = 0.056), bad subjective sleep quality (p ˂ 0.0001, r  = 0.286), lower sleep efficiency (p = 0.002, r  = 0.077), higher sleep disturbance (p ˂ 0.0001, r  = 0.225), daytime dysfunction (p ˂ 0.0001, r  = 0.259) and sleep medication intake times a week (p = 0.01, r  = 0.069). Dyspnoea severity was attributed to bad subjective sleep quality (p ˂ 0.0001, r  = 0.069), higher sleep disturbances (p = 0.005, r  = 0.08), and daytime dysfunction (p ˂ 0.0001, r  = 0.108).

CONCLUSION

The PSQI has a significant association with the CAT and mMRC for COPD patients and is linked to the disease's severity.

摘要

背景

慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)会增加睡眠障碍的易感性。本研究旨在评估 COPD 严重程度标准与睡眠质量之间的关系。

方法

2019 年 4 月至 2021 年 3 月,来自伊朗德黑兰伊朗医科大学 Rasul Akram 医院的 158 名 COPD 患者接受了匹兹堡睡眠质量指数(PSQI)、COPD 评估测试(CAT)、改良医学研究委员会(mMRC)呼吸困难量表、肺功能和脉搏血氧饱和度检查。

结果

158 名受试者中,125 名男性(79%),33 名女性(21%)。受试者的平均年龄和 FEV1/FVC 比值分别为 62.6±11.5 和 65.6±14.9%。CAT 评分和 Spo2 饱和度的平均值分别为 16.2±7 和 91.5±10.8%。PSQI 评分的平均值为 8.2±3.8。PSQI 评分与 FEV1 和 FEV1/FVC 比值之间的关联无统计学意义(p=0.64 和 0.58),而 PSQI 评分与 CAT 评分(p˂0.0001,r=0.51)和呼吸困难严重程度(p˂0.0001,r=0.29)之间的关联具有统计学意义。CAT 评分较高的患者睡眠质量较差,特别是在更长的睡眠潜伏期(p=0.001,r=0.056)、主观睡眠质量较差(p˂0.0001,r=0.286)、睡眠效率较低(p=0.002,r=0.077)、睡眠障碍更严重(p˂0.0001,r=0.225)、白天功能障碍(p˂0.0001,r=0.259)和每周睡眠药物摄入次数(p=0.01,r=0.069)。呼吸困难严重程度与主观睡眠质量差(p˂0.0001,r=0.069)、睡眠障碍更严重(p=0.005,r=0.08)和白天功能障碍(p˂0.0001,r=0.108)有关。

结论

PSQI 与 COPD 患者的 CAT 和 mMRC 有显著关联,与疾病严重程度相关。

相似文献

1
The association between sleep quality, health status and disability due to breathlessness in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients.慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的睡眠质量、健康状况和呼吸困难导致残疾之间的关联。
Clin Respir J. 2021 Nov;15(11):1168-1174. doi: 10.1111/crj.13423. Epub 2021 Aug 6.
2
Factors responsible for poor sleep quality in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者睡眠质量差的相关因素。
BMC Pulm Med. 2016 Aug 8;16(1):118. doi: 10.1186/s12890-016-0281-6.
3
Daytime sleepiness and quality of sleep in patients with COPD compared to control group.与对照组相比,慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者的日间嗜睡和睡眠质量
Glob J Health Sci. 2013 Feb 25;5(3):150-5. doi: 10.5539/gjhs.v5n3p150.
4
Impact of Sleep Quality on the Health-Related Quality of Life of Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.睡眠质量对慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者健康相关生活质量的影响。
West Afr J Med. 2018 Sep-Dec;35(3):173-179.
5
The relationship between sleep quality and dyspnoea severity in patients with COPD.COPD 患者睡眠质量与呼吸困难严重程度的关系。
Afr Health Sci. 2020 Dec;20(4):1785-1792. doi: 10.4314/ahs.v20i4.32.
6
Discrepancies between modified Medical Research Council dyspnea score and COPD assessment test score in patients with COPD.慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者改良医学研究委员会呼吸困难评分与COPD评估测试评分之间的差异
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2015 Aug 12;10:1623-31. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S87147. eCollection 2015.
7
Modified Medical Research Council scale vs Baseline Dyspnea Index to evaluate dyspnea in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.改良医学研究委员会量表与基线呼吸困难指数用于评估慢性阻塞性肺疾病中的呼吸困难
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2015 Aug 18;10:1663-72. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S82408. eCollection 2015.
8
Poor sleep quality, COPD severity and survival according to CASIS and Pittsburgh questionnaires.根据 CASIS 和匹兹堡问卷评估的睡眠质量差、COPD 严重程度与生存率。
Sci Rep. 2023 Oct 31;13(1):18656. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-45717-9.
9
Features of COPD patients by comparing CAT with mMRC: a retrospective, cross-sectional study.比较 CAT 与 mMRC 对 COPD 患者特征的影响:一项回顾性、横断面研究。
NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2015 Nov 5;25:15063. doi: 10.1038/npjpcrm.2015.63.
10
Validity of the Brazilian version of the COPD assessment test in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者中巴西版慢性阻塞性肺疾病评估测试的有效性。
Clin Respir J. 2021 Mar;15(3):358-364. doi: 10.1111/crj.13308. Epub 2020 Dec 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Psychometric Validation of the Simplified Chinese Version of the Dyspnoea-12 Questionnaire for Patients with Primary Lung Cancer.原发性肺癌患者中文版简化版呼吸困难-12问卷的心理测量学验证
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Jan 20;13(2):201. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13020201.