• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

四种不同牙科激光对钛表面的体外细菌减少作用

Bacterial reduction effect of four different dental lasers on titanium surfaces in vitro.

作者信息

Misischia W Patrick, Xenoudi Pinelopi, Yukna Raymond A, Schurr Michael J

机构信息

Advanced Periodontal Therapies, Department of Surgical Dentistry, University of Colorado School of Dental Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.

, Boulder, CO, USA.

出版信息

Lasers Med Sci. 2021 Oct;36(8):1759-1767. doi: 10.1007/s10103-021-03349-3. Epub 2021 Jul 27.

DOI:10.1007/s10103-021-03349-3
PMID:34313893
Abstract

Compare the effectiveness of selected dental lasers for decontamination of machined titanium surfaces in vitro. Seventy-two sterile machined surface titanium discs were individually inoculated with strains of Streptococcus mutans (Sm), Streptococcus oralis (So), Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans (Aa), or all three bacteria together (MIX) at 34.0 C, 20.8% O and 5% CO for 12 h. After incubation, the discs were divided into six groups: 1) no treatment, 2) 0.12% chlorhexidine gluconate (CHX), and 3) 10,600 CO, 4) 810 nm diode, 5) 2780 nm Er,Cr:YSGG, 6) 1064 nm Nd:YAG laser groups. After treatment, any remaining viable bacteria were liberated from the discs via sonication, transferred onto brain heart infusion (BHI) agar plates for culturing, and colony-forming units (CFUs) were recorded. Statistical analysis was performed. There were statistically significantly differences (SSD) (p < 0.01) in bacterial reduction of discs individually inoculated with Aa between the Er,Cr:YSGG and Nd:YAG lasers. There was also a SSD (p < 0.01) lower effect with the MIX with the Er,Cr:YSGG compared with all other modalities. Bacterial reduction with the CO was better (p < 0.001) than treatment with CHX or the Er,Cr:YSGG laser on killing of So. Although all modalities of treatment showed a mean of 98% or greater viable bacterial reduction, the most consistent bacterial reduction of all titanium discs was with the Nd:YAG laser (100%).

摘要

比较所选牙科激光在体外对加工钛表面进行去污的效果。将72个无菌加工表面钛盘分别接种变形链球菌(Sm)、口腔链球菌(So)、伴放线聚集杆菌(Aa)菌株或三种细菌混合菌(MIX),在34.0℃、20.8%氧气和5%二氧化碳环境下培养12小时。培养后,将圆盘分为六组:1)不处理;2)0.12%葡萄糖酸氯己定(CHX);3)10600 CO;4)810纳米二极管;5)2780纳米铒铬:钇钪镓石榴石(Er,Cr:YSGG);6)1064纳米钕:钇铝石榴石(Nd:YAG)激光组。处理后,通过超声处理从圆盘中释放出任何残留的活菌,转移到脑心浸液(BHI)琼脂平板上进行培养,并记录菌落形成单位(CFU)。进行了统计分析。在单独接种Aa的圆盘的细菌减少方面,铒铬:钇钪镓石榴石激光和钕:钇铝石榴石激光之间存在统计学显著差异(SSD)(p < 0.01)。与所有其他方式相比,铒铬:钇钪镓石榴石激光对混合菌的效果也有统计学显著差异(p < 0.01)且较低。在杀死So方面,CO激光的细菌减少效果比CHX或铒铬:钇钪镓石榴石激光处理更好(p < 0.001)。尽管所有处理方式均显示活菌减少平均值达到98%或更高,但所有钛盘最一致的细菌减少是使用钕:钇铝石榴石激光(100%)。

相似文献

1
Bacterial reduction effect of four different dental lasers on titanium surfaces in vitro.四种不同牙科激光对钛表面的体外细菌减少作用
Lasers Med Sci. 2021 Oct;36(8):1759-1767. doi: 10.1007/s10103-021-03349-3. Epub 2021 Jul 27.
2
Effect of a Er, Cr:YSGG laser and a Er:YAG laser treatment on oral biofilm-contaminated titanium.Er, Cr:YSGG 激光和 Er:YAG 激光处理对口腔生物膜污染钛的影响。
J Appl Oral Sci. 2020 Nov 30;28:e20200528. doi: 10.1590/1678-7757-2020-0528. eCollection 2020.
3
Er,Cr:YSGG laser surface treatment of gamma titanium aluminide: Scanning electron microscopy-energy-dispersive X-ray spectrometer analysis, wettability and and bacteria count-in vitro study.钇稳定氧化锆(Er,Cr:YSGG)激光表面处理钛铝金属间化合物:扫描电子显微镜-能谱仪分析、润湿性和体外细菌计数研究。
Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2020 Aug;234(8):769-783. doi: 10.1177/0954411920924517. Epub 2020 May 18.
4
Efficacy of antimicrobial photodynamic therapy for elimination of Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans biofilm on Laser-Lok titanium discs.激光锁定钛盘上抗菌光动力疗法消除伴放线放线杆菌生物膜的疗效。
Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2019 Sep;27:462-466. doi: 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2019.07.012. Epub 2019 Jul 27.
5
In Vitro-Activity of Er:YAG Laser in Comparison with other Treatment Modalities on Biofilm Ablation from Implant and Tooth Surfaces.掺铒钇铝石榴石激光与其他治疗方式对种植体和牙齿表面生物膜消融的体外活性比较
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 26;12(1):e0171086. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0171086. eCollection 2017.
6
The effects of using erbium, chromium-doped:yttrium-scandium-gallium-garnet laser on the surface modification, bacterial decontamination, and cell adhesion on zirconia discs: an in vitro study.铒铬:掺钇钪镓石榴石激光对氧化锆片表面改性、除菌和细胞黏附影响的体外研究。
Lasers Med Sci. 2021 Oct;36(8):1701-1708. doi: 10.1007/s10103-021-03313-1. Epub 2021 Apr 30.
7
Antimicrobial efficacy of photodynamic therapy using two different light sources on the titanium-adherent biofilms of Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans: An in vitro study.两种不同光源的光动力疗法对黏附于钛表面的伴放线放线杆菌生物膜的抗菌效果:一项体外研究。
Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2019 Jun;26:85-89. doi: 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2019.03.004. Epub 2019 Mar 2.
8
In vitro effect of antimicrobial photodynamic therapy with phycocyanin on Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans biofilm on SLA titanium discs.藻蓝蛋白光动力抗菌疗法对 SLA 钛盘上伴放线放线杆菌生物膜的体外作用。
Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2020 Dec;32:102062. doi: 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2020.102062. Epub 2020 Oct 14.
9
Comparative evaluation of antimicrobial effects of Er:YAG, diode, and CO₂ lasers on titanium discs: an experimental study.铒钇铝石榴石激光、二极管激光和二氧化碳激光对钛盘抗菌效果的比较评估:一项实验研究。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012 May;70(5):1064-9. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2011.11.021. Epub 2012 Jan 28.
10
The effect of Er:YAG laser treatment on biofilm formation on titanium and zirconia disc surfaces.铒钇铝石榴石激光治疗对钛和氧化锆盘表面生物膜形成的影响。
J Periodontol. 2023 Mar;94(3):344-353. doi: 10.1002/JPER.22-0243. Epub 2022 Dec 7.

引用本文的文献

1
A randomised clinical trial comparing a surgical approach for treatment of peri-implantitis to non-surgical debridement with adjunctive diode laser therapy.一项随机临床试验,比较一种治疗种植体周围炎的手术方法与非手术清创联合辅助二极管激光治疗的效果。
Clin Oral Investig. 2025 Feb 19;29(2):142. doi: 10.1007/s00784-025-06204-9.
2
Bacterial reduction and temperature increase of titanium dental implant models treated with a 445 nm diode laser: an in vitro study.445nm 半导体激光处理钛牙种植体模型的细菌减少和温度升高:一项体外研究。
Sci Rep. 2024 Aug 5;14(1):18053. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-68780-2.
3
Advanced and Readily-Available Wireless-Powered Blue-Light-Implant for Non-Invasive Peri-Implant Disinfection.

本文引用的文献

1
Decontamination methods to restore the biocompatibility of contaminated titanium surfaces.恢复受污染钛表面生物相容性的去污方法。
J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2019 Jun 25;49(3):193-204. doi: 10.5051/jpis.2019.49.3.193. eCollection 2019 Jun.
2
Comparison of the Effects of Er, Cr: YSGG Laser and Super-Saturated Citric Acid on the Debridement of Contaminated Implant Surfaces.铒铬:钇钪镓石榴石激光与过饱和柠檬酸对污染种植体表面清创效果的比较
J Lasers Med Sci. 2018 Fall;9(4):254-260. doi: 10.15171/jlms.2018.46. Epub 2018 Sep 17.
3
Antimicrobial efficacy of photodynamic therapy using two different light sources on the titanium-adherent biofilms of Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans: An in vitro study.
用于非侵入式种植体周围消毒的先进且易于获取的无线供电蓝光植入物。
Adv Sci (Weinh). 2023 May;10(14):e2203472. doi: 10.1002/advs.202203472. Epub 2023 Mar 19.
4
investigation of the antibacterial and anti-inflammatory effects of LED irradiation.LED照射的抗菌和抗炎作用研究
J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2023 Apr;53(2):110-119. doi: 10.5051/jpis.2200920046. Epub 2022 Sep 7.
5
Assessment of Disinfection Potential of Q-Switch Nd: YAG Laser on Contaminated Titanium Implant Surfaces.调Q钕:钇铝石榴石激光对污染钛种植体表面消毒潜力的评估
Materials (Basel). 2021 Oct 14;14(20):6078. doi: 10.3390/ma14206078.
两种不同光源的光动力疗法对黏附于钛表面的伴放线放线杆菌生物膜的抗菌效果:一项体外研究。
Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2019 Jun;26:85-89. doi: 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2019.03.004. Epub 2019 Mar 2.
4
Microstructural Evaluation of Contaminated Implant Surface Treated by Laser, Photodynamic Therapy, and Chlorhexidine 2 percent.对经激光、光动力疗法和2%氯己定处理的受污染种植体表面进行微观结构评估。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2018 Sep/Oct;33(5):1019-1026. doi: 10.11607/jomi.6325.
5
Formation of biofilm on various implant abutment materials.生物膜在各种种植体基台材料上的形成。
Gen Dent. 2018 Sep-Oct;66(5):39-44.
6
Effect of conventional and contemporary disinfectant techniques on three peri-implantitis associated microbiotas.传统和现代消毒技术对三种种植体周围炎相关微生物群的影响。
Am J Dent. 2017 Feb;30(1):23-26.
7
Antimicrobial Effects of Three Different Treatment Modalities on Dental Implant Surfaces.三种不同治疗方式对牙种植体表面的抗菌作用。
J Oral Implantol. 2017 Dec;43(6):429-436. doi: 10.1563/aaid-joi-D-16-00147. Epub 2017 Oct 3.
8
Prevalences of peri-implantitis and peri-implant mucositis: systematic review and meta-analysis.种植体周围炎和种植体周围黏膜炎的患病率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Dent. 2017 Jul;62:1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2017.04.011. Epub 2017 May 3.
9
In Vitro-Activity of Er:YAG Laser in Comparison with other Treatment Modalities on Biofilm Ablation from Implant and Tooth Surfaces.掺铒钇铝石榴石激光与其他治疗方式对种植体和牙齿表面生物膜消融的体外活性比较
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 26;12(1):e0171086. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0171086. eCollection 2017.
10
Chemotherapeutic decontamination of dental implants colonized by mature multispecies oral biofilm.成熟多物种口腔生物膜定植的牙种植体的化学消毒。
J Clin Periodontol. 2017 Apr;44(4):403-409. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12699. Epub 2017 Mar 6.