Pfau Thilo, Persson-Sjodin Emma, Gardner Harriet, Orssten Olivia, Hernlund Elin, Rhodin Marie
Department of Clinical Science and Services, The Royal Veterinary College, London, United Kingdom.
Department of Anatomy, Physiology and Biochemistry, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.
Front Vet Sci. 2021 Jul 12;8:692031. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.692031. eCollection 2021.
Differences in movement asymmetry between surfaces and with increasing speed increase the complexity of incorporating gait analysis measurements from lunging into clinical decision making. This observational study sets out to quantify by means of quantitative gait analysis the influence of surface and speed on individual-rein movement asymmetry measurements and their averages across reins (average-rein measurements). Head, withers, and pelvic movement asymmetry was quantified in 27 horses, identified previously as presenting with considerable movement asymmetries on the straight, during trot in hand and on the lunge on two surfaces at two speeds. Mixed linear models ( < 0.05) with horse as the random factor and surface and speed category (and direction) as fixed factors analyzed the effects on 11 individual-rein and average-rein asymmetry measures. Limits of agreement quantified differences between individual-rein and average-rein measurements. A higher number of individual-rein asymmetry variables-particularly when the limb that contributed to movement asymmetry on the straight was on the inside of the circle-were affected by speed (nine variables, all ≤ 0.047) and surface (three variables, all ≤ 0.037) compared with average-rein asymmetry variables (two for speed, all ≤ 0.003; two for surface, all ≤ 0.046). Six variables were significantly different between straight-line and average-rein assessments (all ≤ 0.031), and asymmetry values were smaller for average-rein assessments. Limits of agreement bias varied between +0.4 and +4.0 mm with standard deviations between 3.2 and 12.9 mm. Fewer average-rein variables were affected by speed highlighting the benefit of comparing left and right rein measurements. Only one asymmetry variable showed a surface difference for individual-rein and average-rein data, emphasizing the benefit of assessing surface differences on each rein individually. Variability in straight-line vs. average-rein measurements across horses and exercise conditions highlight the potential for average-rein measurements during the diagnostic process; further studies after diagnostic analgesia are needed.
不同表面以及速度增加时运动不对称性的差异,增加了将弓步运动的步态分析测量结果纳入临床决策的复杂性。这项观察性研究旨在通过定量步态分析,量化表面和速度对个体缰绳运动不对称性测量及其缰绳平均值(平均缰绳测量值)的影响。对27匹马的头部、鬐甲部和骨盆运动不对称性进行了量化,这些马先前被确定在直线行走、牵遛小跑和以两种速度在两种表面上进行弓步运动时存在明显的运动不对称性。以马为随机因素,表面和速度类别(以及方向)为固定因素的混合线性模型(<0.05)分析了对11项个体缰绳和平均缰绳不对称性测量指标的影响。一致性界限量化了个体缰绳和平均缰绳测量值之间的差异。与平均缰绳不对称性变量相比(速度方面两个变量,均≤0.003;表面方面两个变量,均≤0.046),更多的个体缰绳不对称性变量——尤其是当在直线行走时导致运动不对称性的肢体位于圆圈内侧时——受速度(九个变量,均≤0.047)和表面(三个变量,均≤0.037)的影响。直线评估和平均缰绳评估之间有六个变量存在显著差异(均≤0.031),平均缰绳评估的不对称值较小。一致性界限偏差在+0.4至+4.0毫米之间变化,标准差在3.2至12.9毫米之间。受速度影响的平均缰绳变量较少,这突出了比较左右缰绳测量值的益处。只有一个不对称性变量在个体缰绳和平均缰绳数据中显示出表面差异,强调了分别评估每条缰绳表面差异的益处。不同马匹和运动条件下直线测量与平均缰绳测量的变异性突出了诊断过程中平均缰绳测量的潜力;诊断性镇痛后还需要进一步研究。